asme safety valve code supplier

Certifies Allied Valve Inc. is qualified and approved to assemble Pressure Relief Valves (PRV) for use in Section I applications including boilers and pressure vessels.

Certifies Allied Valve Inc. is qualified and approved to assemble Pressure Relief Valves (PRV) for use in Section VIII applications including all uses outside of boilers and pressure vessels.

Certifies Allied Valve Inc. is qualified and approved to calibrate, test, and stamp Pressure Relief Valves (PRV) for use in Section I and Section VIII applications.

Certifies Allied Valve Inc. is qualified and approved to repair Pressure Relief Valves (PRV) of all brands for both Section I and Section VIII applications.

The Kingston Model 110C High Pressure Safety Valve is an ASME Code Certified, precision machined valve with a hard seat. This valve features support for high pressure applications up to 600 psi. It comes equipped with manual test lever and is construction is of cast brass alloy body, machined brass stem with stainless steel ball, seated on a stainless steel base. The Kingston Model 110C High Pressure Safety Valve approved in Massachusetts and Washington DC and is stamped with UV and NB symbols. Registered in all Canadian provinces and territories.

The Kingston Model 118CSS High Capacity Safety Valve is an ASME Code Certified, precision machined brass valve with a hard seat. This valve supports ASME Code applications up to 300 psi. It also features a stainless steel ball for durability and a pull ring for manual testing. Kingston Model 118CSS High Capacity Safety Valve is designed to flow extremely high volumes.Internal construction and performance are the same as Model 119CSS differing only by the pull ring used for manual testing.The Kingston Model 118CSS Safety Valve, like every Kingston Safety Valve, is set and tested at factory for quality and dependability.

ASME safety valves are used across several applications including low-pressure and high-pressure boilers, process equipment, and air, gas, and vapor equipment. We have multiple products in a range of configurations and material construction that meet ASME Class I, IV, and VIII.

Boiler explosions have been responsible for widespread damage to companies throughout the years, and that’s why today’s boilers are equipped with safety valves and/or relief valves. Boiler safety valves are designed to prevent excess pressure, which is usually responsible for those devastating explosions. That said, to ensure that boiler safety valves are working properly and providing adequate protection, they must meet regulatory specifications and require ongoing maintenance and periodic testing. Without these precautions, malfunctioning safety valves may fail, resulting in potentially disastrous consequences.

Boiler safety valves are activated by upstream pressure. If the pressure exceeds a defined threshold, the valve activates and automatically releases pressure. Typically used for gas or vapor service, boiler safety valves pop fully open once a pressure threshold is reached and remain open until the boiler pressure reaches a pre-defined, safe lower pressure.

Boiler relief valves serve the same purpose – automatically lowering boiler pressure – but they function a bit differently than safety valves. A relief valve doesn’t open fully when pressure exceeds a defined threshold; instead, it opens gradually when the pressure threshold is exceeded and closes gradually until the lower, safe threshold is reached. Boiler relief valves are typically used for liquid service.

There are also devices known as “safety relief valves” which have the characteristics of both types discussed above. Safety relief valves can be used for either liquid or gas or vapor service.

Nameplates must be fastened securely and permanently to the safety valve and remain readable throughout the lifespan of the valve, so durability is key.

The National Board of Boiler and Pressure Vessel Inspectors offers guidance and recommendations on boiler and pressure vessel safety rules and regulations. However, most individual states set forth their own rules and regulations, and while they may be similar across states, it’s important to ensure that your boiler safety valves meet all state and local regulatory requirements.

The National Board published NB-131, Recommended Boiler and Pressure Vessel Safety Legislation, and NB-132, Recommended Administrative Boiler and Pressure Vessel Safety Rules and Regulationsin order to provide guidance and encourage the development of crucial safety laws in jurisdictions that currently have no laws in place for the “proper construction, installation, inspection, operation, maintenance, alterations, and repairs” necessary to protect workers and the public from dangerous boiler and pressure vessel explosions that may occur without these safeguards in place.

The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) governs the code that establishes guidelines and requirements for safety valves. Note that it’s up to plant personnel to familiarize themselves with the requirements and understand which parts of the code apply to specific parts of the plant’s steam systems.

High steam capacity requirements, physical or economic constraints may make the use of a single safety valve impossible. In these cases, using multiple safety valves on the same system is considered an acceptable practice, provided that proper sizing and installation requirements are met – including an appropriately sized vent pipe that accounts for the total steam venting capacity of all valves when open at the same time.

The lowest rating (MAWP or maximum allowable working pressure) should always be used among all safety devices within a system, including boilers, pressure vessels, and equipment piping systems, to determine the safety valve set pressure.

Avoid isolating safety valves from the system, such as by installing intervening shut-off valves located between the steam component or system and the inlet.

Contact the valve supplier immediately for any safety valve with a broken wire seal, as this indicates that the valve is unsafe for use. Safety valves are sealed and certified in order to prevent tampering that can prevent proper function.

Avoid attaching vent discharge piping directly to a safety valve, which may place unnecessary weight and additional stress on the valve, altering the set pressure.

**Update to this article, June 7, 2022 : If you found this article helpful, here is a link to another article I recently found that does a nice job explaining the topic: ENGINEERS BEWARE: API vs ASME Relief Valve Orifice Size – Petro Chem Engineering (petrochemengg.com)

NOTE: this article is written to an audience that is familiar with PSVs, PSV sizing, and API and ASME standards at a basic level. I initially wrote this article in early 2017, and due to some great input and questions made significant revisions to increase clarity in mid-2018. I hope it is helpful to you, please send me a message with any comments/questions!

If you"ve ever sized/selected a Pressure Safety-Relief Valve (PSV) using vendor sizing programs or good-old hand calculations, you"ve probably run into a very strange anomaly: Why does a PSV orifice size change between American Petroleum Institute (API) and American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) data sets? What is an "effective" orifice area? How do I know which standard to use when selecting a PSV?

Usually, this issue is one of curiosity and doesn"t affect the end result of what valve is chosen. Common practice is to default to API sizing equations and parameters, and only use ASME data sets for situations outside of the API letter-designations. But what if I told you that approach is likely causing you to oversize about 10% of your PSVs and their respective piping systems?

Most of the time simply using API data sets is fine. And I should note that this is a conservative approach, so you won’t make a mistake doing this. But did you know that PSVs are certified to ASME capacities, not API? And did you know those ASME capacities are nearly always higher than the API ones? I’m guessing you don’t, because there are very few resources available that speak to this topic. I’ve found it common for engineers to understand API 520 quite well, but have a very limited working knowledge of how the ASME BPVC comes into play.

Too often, we leave that third part out of the process, and simply calculate relief loads and select valves using API techniques, without ever checking our selection against certified ASME data. Proper application of these standards is the first key point of this article:

Initial sizing and valve selection is done using API equations, and final valve selection and certification is done using ASME-certified coefficients and capacities.

When sizing a PSV, the sizing equations are always API 520. When a PSV is certified, it is always certified to ASME BPVC (whether one “selects” ASME certification or not!) It"s important to remember that the ASME BPVC is the "code", the standard to which we must design. API 520/526 are "recommended practices" which were developed to give engineers a tool to meet the ASME requirements. Another way to look at it: ASME BPVC sets the goal, API 520/526 provide the instructions, and ASME has the final say.

The BPVC is an enormous code, and not reviewed in detail here. On the subject of PSVs, it basically says that a PSV must be capable of relieving the required load, and it must be tested in a specific manner to be certified to do so. If a valve is tested per the specific directions in the BPVC, it will be ASME certified and receive an ASME UV stamp.

NOTE: when specifying a PSV for a pressure vessel, it"s important to always specify that the UV stamp is required. There are times when a non-code PSV is acceptable, but that is outside the scope of this article.

The first thing API does is attempt to standardize physical PSV sizes and design, and it does so in API RP 526, which is targeted at PSV manufacturers. API provides pre-defined valve sizes, with letter designations D through T (API 526). It also defines other details directed toward valve manufacturers (such as temperature ratings). All of this is intended as minimum design standards, and manufacturers are free to exceed these parameters as they wish.

The second thing API does is provide standardized equations and parameters to use when trying to figure out just what size of a PSV one needs for a particular scenario. The equations account for design parameters that ASME doesn"t speak to, such as specific fluid properties, backpressures, critical flow, two-phase flow, and many other aspects of fluid dynamics that will affect the ability of a particular valve to relieve a required load.

API sizing equations are by nature theoretical, standardized, and use default or "dummy" values for several sizing parameters that may or may not reflect the actual values for any specific valve.

API RP 520 very clearly talks about this, and emphasizes that the intended use of its equations is to determine a preliminary valve size, which should be verified with actual data. API intends PSV sizing to be a two-step process, but we are often unaware of this because we (gasp) don’t read the full standard, and/or rely solely on vendor sizing software that hides the iteration from us. See API 520, part 1, section 5.2 for further explanation.

When valves are built, they are built to the API RP 526 standard, however, as one might imagine, when valves are actually tested and certified, the results don’t match up identically to the theoretical values that were calculated. This is where API and ASME intersect; we switch from calculations (API) which were used as a basis to design the valve, to actual empirical data (ASME) to certify the valve. When a valve manufacturer gets the UV code stamp that certifies the valve orifice size and capacity, it is based on actual test results, not API sizing standards. And ASME (which came first) does not have tiered letter designations. The typical D, E, F, etc. sizes we refer to are strictly an API tool, and ASME’s capacity certifications are completely independent of them!

2. They test the final product according to ASME BPVC, and get a result that equates to an effective orifice area of 4.90in2. This is its ASME effective area.

3. A third-party Engineer (you), trying to select a PSV, runs a sizing calculation using API 520 equations on ABC Valve Company"s sizing software, gets a result that requires 4.66in2 to relieve the load, and is now thoroughly confused on what size valve to select.

If one selects the API data set on the sizing software in this example, it will automatically eliminate N-orifice valves as an option, and bump the user up to a P-orifice. However, if one simply selects the ASME data set, the N-orifice valve magically reappears as an option. How can this be? Will the N-orifice work or not?

The short answer is yes, it is certified to an actual area of 4.90in2. So the “N” orifice for this specific PSV will work, and is certified to do so, in this application. Remember: use API to get you close, and ASME to confirm the final answer.

Digest that for a moment. If you’ve sized and purchased more than a dozen PSVs, chances are you have inadvertently selected a PSV a full size larger than you needed to, in a situation much like our example, simply because you chose a PSV based on its API “rating” rather than its real, certified, stamped ASME rating. If that was a small valve, impact was probably nil. But what if this happened on a valve that resulted in selecting a 8x10 PSV when you could have used a 6x8?

If you’re like me, that answer isn’t very satisfying. Why on earth is this so confusing? How can you simply hit a button on the sizing program and a different size of valve is suddenly acceptable? The key lies how the main coefficient of discharge, Kd, is handled, and how capacities are determined.

There are several K values used in API calculations, all of which have generic values defined in API 520 that can be used for preliminary sizing. These are the numbers used in initial sizing calculations to get us close, then (if we do this correctly) replaced with the actual/tested/empirical/ASME values when we get a certified valve. Remember, anytime you hear “certified” or “stamped”, think ASME.

Let’s take the numbers from the example above, which came from an attempt to size a valve for liquid relief. API says to use a value of Kd=0.65 for liquid relief. If one uses the API data set on the vendor software, then the calculation stops here, and you get a required area of 4.66in2. When you select a valve, you’re comparing that to the API effective (actual) area of an N orifice, which is 4.34 in2, which is obviously too small and you’d logically step up to a P orifice. However….

Remember that the API N-orifice area is just the benchmark, a minimum requirement, and may or may not (most likely not) reflect the actual area of a real-life PSV. Once a valve is selected, all of those K values and capacities should be replaced with actual ASME-certified K values, also determined by testing, that are specific to each valve model, and the calculations performed again.

Normally, ASME-certified K-values are smaller than the API dummy values, driving up the required orifice area. So valve manufacturers have to over-design their valves to make up for it, resulting in ASME-certified areas and capacities that typically exceed the benchmark API ones. The end result of all this?

It (almost) all boils down to one sneaky little sentence in the ASME BPVC which mandates a 10% safety factor on the empirically-determined Kd that “de-rates” the valve (see ASME BPVC Section VIII, UG-131.e.2). This tidbit seems to be a little-known fact that is key to proper PSV sizing and selection, because as engineers we often pile safety factors upon each other and oversize our equipment. I cannot highlight this enough:

I mentioned above that ASME K values are nearly always lower than API values, due to this 10% de-rating. The PSV in our example scenario has a determined Kd of 0.73, which is adjusted down by 10% for a final AMSE Kd of 0.66, slightly higher than the dummy API value (that just means that this particular valve proved it could do about 11% better than the minimum theoretical flow calculated by API when it was tested). So, for our valve in question, the Required ASME area is slightly less than the API area. This is atypical, but not unheard of, and again points to the importance of checking the ASME ratings of any valve you select, and comparing against the API benchmarks.

But that’s not the whole picture. For our example, the net effect of the ASME Kd is basically nothing. So how is it the ASME capacity is higher? This brings us to the last key concept:

When you choose to use the ASME data on a specific valve, it’s not just the Kd sizing factor that changes; the actual orifice area and therefore the capacity of the valve also adjusts to empirical, certified values. You can generally expect both values to increase over the API values.

Why is this? Simply that any given real-world valve is usually over-designed so that it will meet and exceed the required minimum capacity of its corresponding API size. What a simple concept, but so often overlooked by engineers!

Back to our example scenario: even though the ASME Kd, and hence required area, adjustment had a negligible effect, the actual ASME orifice area, and hence capacity, is significantly higher than the listed API area and capacity for an N-orifice. Below is a summary:API N Orifice: 4.340 in2

*Note: this is data from a real case; the specific PSV make/model is omitted. Did you catch the result? The actual, certified capacity of this valve is nearly 13% higher than the generic N-orifice valve, and that includes its 10% safety factor!

With this adjusted orifice area, we can compare to the ASME certified area (which is always going to be larger than the API area), and we have our final answer for the valve size. Often this will not result in a different choice of valve, but sometimes, as in the example case, it will allow us to use a valve with an API letter designation that did not appear large enough based on its API effective area. This can save time and money for our plants by preventing over-sizing valves, leading to smaller piping systems to support them. And remember, the ASME values are empirical and have a 10% safety factor built in, so we don’t need to worry about cutting the design too close; the conservatism is already built in to the method. We can choose the Brand X N-orifice valve and sleep well at night!

Avoid simply defaulting to the API data set for the final “rating” or data sheet when selecting a PSV. Use API sizing calculations as they are intended: for preliminary valve selection. Then switch to the ASME data set. This will often (but not always, remember, it"s valve-specific) result in two differences:

2. A required orifice area that is greater than the one calculated by API. This is also ok, and is usually due to the 10% de-rating on Kd that ASME requires.

Closing notes: PSV sizing and selection is a big topic, and this article only addresses one issue. I have chosen to omit specific code references and quotations in an attempt to make this a general guideline that is useful for most engineers, not an interpretation of the codes. Many tangent issues can spin off from this article; I will be happy to help with any questions it may generate. Please email me any comments or suggestions, I welcome all input.

Pressure Safety and Relief Valves (PSV) are totally directed by codes and regulations. The four most important codes and standards for PSVs (safety valve standards) are ASME (USA), API (USA),ISO (international) and PED (Europe).

ISO 4126-6.Safety devices for protection against excessive pressure — Part 6: Application, selection and installation of bursting disc safety devices.

ISO 4126-9.Safety devices for protection against excessive pressure — Part 9: Application and installation of safety devices excluding stand-alone bursting disc safety devices.

ISO 4126-10.Safety devices for protection against excessive pressure — Part 10: Sizing of safety valves for gas/liquid two-phase flow.ISO Pressure relief code

Austria.SAA AS 1271.Safety valves, other valves, liquid level gauges and other fittings for boilers and unfired pressure vessels.Other Countries Pressure Relief International ISO Codes