williams space mission parts brands

Notes:The 2-Player version of this game is pop bumper caps while others have white ones. We don"t know the reason for this difference. The 2-player "Space Odyssey" seems to always have yellow pop bumper caps.

Steve Kordek told us that the backglass art was derived from a picture he obtained from NASA. The picture surely was of the painting made by noted space artist Robert McCall (1919-2010) which can be seen here.

Bally williams 1995 wpc parts service bulletin pinball machine manual free ship. pinball books, manuals & videos. the pictures show the score motor for williams space mission. notice all dirt and carbon dust on and around the score motor, especially the stacks of switches is often dirty and oxidized, it is very important that these switches is absolutely clean and correct adjusted to assure the function of the pinball. 00: ppm- tkc- wh2o: translite plastic keychain - whitewater : $ 7. this machine has all the original artwork and hace never been repainted. you can simply never go wrong with a classic williams mechanical pinball machine. pinball schematics & manuals. side artwork is very well done. space mission; space odyssey; space shuttle;. revenge from mars pinball manual.

williams space mission gp. gottlieb " short frame" latch- trip relays used during the 1970s are even more troublesome ( ax/ bx relays on multi- players, ax on single players. bally/ williams pinball. 50: ppm- tkc- totan: translite plastic keychain - tales of the arabian nights. another view of the art and the coin door. i" m trying to track down some schematics ( and manual, if it exists) for a newly acquired machine ( williams space odyssey). serving the pinball community since 1999. space invaders pinball: space invaders pinball operating manual: 59 pages: 2. space mission ( williams) schematics: price: $ 19. upper playfield has two pop bumpers, a horseshoe and a. 1 mb: space shuttle: space shuttle operating manual: 29 pages: 2.

this is one of the best 70" s em pinball williams space mission pinball manual machines, williams" great " space mission"! bally williams nos flipper coil 11722 excl. wms space mission ( em) 1976 documents - vii williams space mission ( emflyer williams space mission manual. ] 140 kb zip : pinmame romset ( l- 5) documentation: 142 kb pdf : operations manual amendments and additions [ williams electronic games. find out everything about space mission ( williams, 1976) pinball machine; general game details, ratings and reviews, photos, videos, high scores, places to play and find machines currently for sale on our market place. pinball parts: order by phone or. ” check out any of our florida gulf coast locations for our large selection of pinball machines.

for example, if a bally or williams pinball won" t light up after turning it on ( and pressing the left flipper button! 5 mb: speakeasy: english manual: 40 pages: 7 mb: spider- man: spiderman pinball manual ( stern site) ( external link) n/ a: 0: star trek: star trek 25th anniversay pinball operating manual: 21 pages: 2. below is a list of trade stimulator manufacturers & models for your information. getaway williams manual ( reprint) $ 24. we played space mission for a bit. space mission- williams - pinball manual - schematics - instructions - book. this 1976 williams space mission pinball machine has recently been restored to good working condition. check out williams space pinball on ebay. 99- - all others $ 24. space mission ( williams 1976) for making db2s.

a wide variety of classified ads buy, rent, sell and find anything - space mission pinball machine by williams listings. gorgar ( wms) silkscreened backglass. can anyone help with this, please? 99 each games marked with * are $ 29. for more information on pinballs, repair, parts, backglasses, values, go to pinball resource center. space mission ( williams) rubber ring kit: price: $ 14. williams introduction to coin operated amusement williams space mission pinball manual games manual. recent actual sales data history for the williams space shuttle pinball machine. williams space mission pinball machine * * coin or plays meter * used.

50 as low as: au$ 15. view and download pinball manuals for free. watch; williams em pinball machine - pair. a classic pinball glass with the scene from a famous event in history full playfield view. classic 1976 williams space mission electromechanical pinball machine. i have more pinball schematics and manuals than anyone, anywhere. under the playfield view.

if you" ve ever played this machine you already know how great it truly is. williams space mission cards backglass resources. the machine has a wooden cabinet and the backglass art is a reproduction of nasa artist robert mccall’ s “ handshake in space. we are posting it for your information. space mission pinball machine by williams in greensboro, north carolina at americanlisted. it" s very well designed, check out the video williams space mission pinball manual to see what it looks like an.

2 / ~ 22 pages williams/ midway wpc schematics / part# / ~ 20 pages williams wpc theory of operation and schematics manual / part# / ~ 62 pages williams/ midway wpc schematics / part# / ~ 14 pages bally parts manuals. i also have schematics and manuals for most arcade and video games. the backglass is in good condition with only one small flake. space mission; space shuttle; space station; star trek the next generation; star wars episode i; swords of fury; tales of the arabian nights; terminator 2 judgment day; the bally game show; the flintstones; the getaway high speed ii; the machine bride of pinbot; whirlwind; white water; bulk items ; balls; cabinet parts. someone pointed me to the ipdb, which then pointed me to planetary pinball to purchase. view pinball sales:. it is truly in good condition for it" s age. space mission; space odyssey; space shuttle;. star wars premium instructions manual.

williams/ midway wpc schematics / part#. i love the way the game looks, especially the backglass, which has a depiction of the apollo/ soyuz space mission from 1975. click on the picture above for schematic in format. williams space mission cards. the machine is ready to play.

buy it now + $ 3. com – classifieds across north carolina. space mission is a game i got from a guy a while ago. tom cahill, former service manager for williams, told us that approximately 200 space mission games were made with steel cabinets. since mpf is just software that supports lots of different physical hardware, you don’ t actually need to have physical pinball machine hardware to complete the tutorial. 99 addams family wpc pinball williams alien star pinball gottlieb amazon for home sales, private parties and one day rentals – call us!

ppang: no good gofers translite - next gen : $ 129. the space mission pinball machine was manufactured by williams starting in the mid- 1960s and production ended in 1976. it was always a player favorite due to the quick playfield action and the vibrant artwork. ), often this can be traced to the switches in the game- over latch- trip relay. com keywords: pinball repair troubleshooting. see the link for them. pinball manuals $ 24.

this tutorial will walk you through using mpf to create a basic pinball machine config. space mission ( williams) game manual: part # pm0356. inside the pinball cabinet. hawes subject: scanned by www. bally 1968 parts catalog / / ~ 138 pages. t is very few worn areas on the playing surface. please read thoroughly before bidding on item. williams space mission schematic.

a great space themed pinball machine from williams. it includes new, cool, high efficiency, long- life, plug- in replacement led lamps for all flashers, backbox general illumination, playfield general illumination, and playfield switched feature lamps. space mission was the most popular electro- mechanical pinball machine ever made by williams with almost 12, 000 machines produced! this is a fun game to play and is one of the first 4 player em" s.

com has been visited by 1m+ users in the past month. this is the led lamp complete conversion kit for the williams space mission pinball machine. the picture surely was of the painting made by noted space artist robert mccallwhich can be seen here. bad cats pinball manual ( reprint) $ 24. i have been collecting these for over 30 years from manufactures, distributors, various shows, and operators all over the country.

this video was made to assist in the repair of em late model williams 4 player pinball machines. this auction is for a 1975 williams space mission pinball machine. it’ s a good “ player” game, meaning it plays nice, but it needs a lot of restoration work. circa 1976), and it" williams space mission pinball manual s history and background, photos, repair help, manuals, for sale and wanted lists, and census survey is brought to you by the international arcade museum at the museum of the game. the space mission coin- operated pinball by williams electronics, inc. 50 each status: in stock.

title: williams pinball troubleshooting and reference manual author: james t. williams system 9 release date: december 1984. ball shooter; buttons. inside the backbox.

browse verified compatible pinball parts for williams space odyssey ( space mission) from marco specialties. i contacted planetary pinball but they are telling me they don" t sell them. pinball snapshots, pagesmike pacak" s pinball flyer reference book s- z: rule sheets: space station rulesheet ( jul/ 25/ 1993), by steve loft : roms: 144 kb zip : game rom l- 5 [ williams electronic games, inc. click on the picture above for manual in format.

This was my first PIN and though I have a sentimental attachment, I’ve resisted the urge to sell it even though I could use the space. I keep it because it’s just a fun pin to play.

The historical theme is probably lost on many, but I believe it commemorates the first time the USA worked with the Soviets jointly in space. But the artwork is still really beautiful. A lot of these games have flaking paint on the back glass from the incandescent bulbs. Mine wasn’t too bad, and I have LED’s in the back box now to prevent further loss due to flaking. You can buy new back-glasses for this pin, but mine is still in decent shape. I’ve seen others that are a lot worse.

The moving target was not a new concept as Williams had used it before. The kick-outs, again not a new concept, on the fippers are great in the sense that they aim right for the moving target. However, they can also be a hindrance if you are like me and prefer to catch the ball on your flipper to set up a shot. This does make it a faster paced game. For a long time I had the Space Station and my ’72 Bally Fireball side-by-side. Most of my friends preferred playing the Space Mission over what is arguably one of the most iconic EM’s ever made.

Another good thing is parts for this machine, such as tune up kits, solenoids, plastics, etc, are readily available. I had a few broken pieces of plastic on the playfield when I bought the table and was able to get a brand new set on EBAY. I also bought a tune up kit to replace the rubber rings and I replaced the regular lights with LED’s. I give it a good polishing every few months and overall it looks great and continues to play great.

As your workplace strategies and needs change, your furniture should adapt and change along with you. Our customers love our products because they are the easiest on the market to reconfigure, and MillerKnoll’s extensive kit of parts enables modifications to be accomplished, easily and economically. When change is necessary for your business, downtime is kept to a minimum and your team is back to work quickly, with minimal disruption.

Alfred Williams & Company’s team of talented designers regularly assists customers in reconfiguring their existing furniture to make better use of space or adjust to changes in their business strategy.

Apollo 13 (April 11–17, 1970) was the seventh crewed mission in the Apollo space program and the third meant to land on the Moon. The craft was launched from Kennedy Space Center on April 11, 1970, but the lunar landing was aborted after an oxygen tank in the service module (SM) failed two days into the mission. The crew instead looped around the Moon and returned safely to Earth on April 17. The mission was commanded by Jim Lovell, with Jack Swigert as command module (CM) pilot and Fred Haise as Lunar Module (LM) pilot. Swigert was a late replacement for Ken Mattingly, who was grounded after exposure to rubella.

A routine stir of an oxygen tank ignited damaged wire insulation inside it, causing an explosion that vented the contents of both of the SM"s oxygen tanks to space. Without oxygen, needed for breathing and for generating electric power, the SM"s propulsion and life support systems could not operate. The CM"s systems had to be shut down to conserve its remaining resources for reentry, forcing the crew to transfer to the LM as a lifeboat. With the lunar landing canceled, mission controllers worked to bring the crew home alive.

Although the LM was designed to support two men on the lunar surface for two days, Mission Control in Houston improvised new procedures so it could support three men for four days. The crew experienced great hardship, caused by limited power, a chilly and wet cabin and a shortage of potable water. There was a critical need to adapt the CM"s cartridges for the carbon dioxide scrubber system to work in the LM; the crew and mission controllers were successful in improvising a solution. The astronauts" peril briefly renewed public interest in the Apollo program; tens of millions watched the splashdown in the South Pacific Ocean on television.

In 1961, U.S. President John F. Kennedy challenged his nation to land an astronaut on the Moon by the end of the decade, with a safe return to Earth.NASA worked towards this goal incrementally, sending astronauts into space during Project Mercury and Project Gemini, leading up to the Apollo program.Apollo 11, which landed on the Moon on July 20, 1969. Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin walked on the lunar surface while Michael Collins orbited the Moon in Command Module Columbia. The mission returned to Earth on July 24, 1969, fulfilling Kennedy"s challenge.

NASA had contracted for fifteen Saturn V rockets to achieve the goal; at the time no one knew how many missions this would require.V on Apollo 11, nine rockets remained available for a hoped-for total of ten landings. After the excitement of Apollo 11, the general public grew apathetic towards the space program and Congress continued to cut NASA"s budget; Apollo 20 was canceled.

Even before the first U.S. astronaut entered space in 1961, planning for a centralized facility to communicate with the spacecraft and monitor its performance had begun, for the most part the brainchild of Christopher C. Kraft Jr., who became NASA"s first flight director. During John Glenn"s Mercury

In 1965, Houston"s Mission Control Center opened, in part designed by Kraft and now named for him.telemetry from the spacecraft, was in communication via voice loop to specialists in a Staff Support Room (or "back room"), who focused on specific spacecraft systems.

Apollo 13 was to be the second H mission, meant to demonstrate precision lunar landings and explore specific sites on the Moon.Apollo 12 demonstrating that the astronauts could perform a precision landing, mission planners were able to focus on more than just landing safely and having astronauts minimally trained in geology gather lunar samples to take home to Earth. There was a greater role for science on Apollo 13, especially for geology, something emphasized by the mission"s motto, Ex luna, scientia (From the Moon, knowledge).

Apollo 13"s mission commander, Jim Lovell, was 42 years old at the time of the spaceflight. He was a graduate of the United States Naval Academy and had been a naval aviator and test pilot before being selected for the second group of astronauts in 1962; he flew with Frank Borman in Gemini 7 in 1965 and Buzz Aldrin in Gemini 12 the following year before flying in Apollo 8 in 1968, the first spacecraft to orbit the Moon.

Jack Swigert, the command module pilot (CMP), was 38 years old and held a B.S. in mechanical engineering and an M.S. in aerospace science; he had served in the Air Force and in state Air National Guards and was an engineering test pilot before being selected for the fifth group of astronauts in 1966.Fred Haise, the lunar module pilot (LMP), was 35 years old. He held a B.S. in aeronautical engineering, had been a Marine Corps fighter pilot, and was a civilian research pilot for NASA when he was selected as a Group5 astronaut.

For Apollo, a third crew of astronauts, known as the support crew, was designated in addition to the prime and backup crews used on projects Mercury and Gemini. Slayton created the support crews because James McDivitt, who would command Apollo 9, believed that, with preparation going on in facilities across the US, meetings that needed a member of the flight crew would be missed. Support crew members were to assist as directed by the mission commander.flight plan, and checklists, and kept them updated;Vance D. Brand, Jack Lousma and either William Pogue or Joseph Kerwin.

For Apollo 13, flight directors were Gene Kranz, White teamGlynn Lunney, Black team; Milton Windler, Maroon team and Gerry Griffin, Gold team.CAPCOMs (the person in Mission Control, during the Apollo program an astronaut, who was responsible for voice communications with the crew)

The Apollo 13 mission insignia depicts the Greek god of the Sun, Apollo, with three horses pulling his chariot across the face of the Moon, and the Earth seen in the distance. This is meant to symbolize the Apollo flights bringing the light of knowledge to all people. The mission motto, Ex luna, scientia ("From the Moon, knowledge"), appears. In choosing it, Lovell adapted the motto of his alma mater, the Naval Academy, Ex scientia, tridens ("From knowledge, sea power").

On the patch, the mission number appeared in Roman numerals as Apollo XIII. It did not have to be modified after Swigert replaced Mattingly, as it is one of only two Apollo mission insignia – the other being Apollo 11 – not to include the names of the crew. It was designed by artist Lumen Martin Winter, who based it on a mural he had painted for the St. Regis Hotel in New York City.Tom Hanks,Captain James A. Lovell Federal Health Care Center in Illinois.

The mission"s motto was in Lovell"s mind when he chose the call sign Aquarius for the lunar module, taken from Aquarius, the bringer of water.a song by that name from the musical Odyssey, was chosen not only for its Homeric association but to refer to the recent movie, a short story by science fiction author Arthur C. Clarke.Odyssey because he liked the word and its definition: a long voyage with many changes of fortune.

The Saturn V rocket used to carry Apollo 13 to the Moon was numbered SA-508, and was almost identical to those used on Apollo8 through 12.S-IC first stage"s engines were rated to generate 440,000 newtons (100,000 lbf) less total thrust than Apollo 12"s, though they remained within specifications.liquid hydrogen propellent cold, the S-II second stage"s cryogenic tanks were insulated; on earlier Apollo missions this came in the form of panels that were affixed, but beginning with Apollo 13, insulation was sprayed onto the exterior of the tanks.J missions to the Moon would require more propellant for their heavier payloads. This made the vehicle the heaviest yet flown by NASA, and Apollo 13 was visibly slower to clear the launch tower than earlier missions.

The Apollo 13 spacecraft consisted of Command Module 109 and Service Module 109 (together CSM-109), called Odyssey, and Lunar Module7 (LM-7), called Aquarius. Also considered part of the spacecraft was the launch escape system, which would propel the command module (CM) to safety in the event of a problem during liftoff, and the Spacecraft–LM Adapter, numbered as SLA-16, which housed the lunar module (LM) during the first hours of the mission.

The LM stages, CM and service module (SM) were received at Kennedy Space Center (KSC) in June 1969; the portions of the Saturn V were received in June and July. Thereafter, testing and assembly proceeded, culminating with the rollout of the launch vehicle, with the spacecraft atop it, on December 15, 1969.

The Apollo 13 prime crew undertook over 1,000 hours of mission-specific training, more than five hours for every hour of the mission"s ten-day planned duration. Each member of the prime crew spent over 400 hours in simulators of the CM and (for Lovell and Haise) of the LM at KSC and at Houston, some of which involved the flight controllers at Mission Control.

Concerned about how close Apollo 11"s LM, Eagle, had come to running out of propellant during its lunar descent, mission planners decided that beginning with Apollo 13, the CSM would bring the LM to the low orbit from which the landing attempt would commence. This was a change from Apollo 11 and 12, on which the LM made the burn to bring it to the lower orbit. The change was part of an effort to increase the amount of hover time available to the astronauts as the missions headed into rougher terrain.

The plan was to devote the first of the two four-hour lunar surface extravehicular activities (EVAs) to setting up the Apollo Lunar Surface Experiments Package (ALSEP) group of scientific instruments; during the second, Lovell and Haise would investigate Cone crater, near the planned landing site.Vomit Comet" in simulated microgravity or lunar gravity, including practice in donning and doffing spacesuits. To prepare for the descent to the Moon"s surface, Lovell flew the Lunar Landing Training Vehicle (LLTV).

To power the ALSEP, the SNAP-27 radioisotope thermoelectric generator (RTG) was flown. Developed by the U.S. Atomic Energy Commission, SNAP-27 was first flown on Apollo 12. The fuel capsule contained about 3.79 kilograms (8.36 lb) of plutonium oxide. The cask placed around the capsule for transport to the Moon was built with heat shields of graphite and of beryllium, and with structural parts of titanium and of Inconel materials. Thus, it was built to withstand the heat of reentry into the Earth"s atmosphere rather than pollute the air with plutonium in the event of an aborted mission.

For the first time, red stripes were placed on the helmet, arms and legs of the commander"s A7L spacesuit. This was done as, after Apollo 11, those reviewing the images taken had trouble distinguishing Armstrong from Aldrin, but the change was approved too late for Apollo 12.

Apollo 13"s primary mission objectives were to: "Perform selenological inspection, survey, and sampling of materials in a preselected region of the Fra Mauro Formation. Deploy and activate an Apollo Lunar Surface Experiments Package. Develop man"s capability to work in the lunar environment. Obtain photographs of candidate exploration sites."Gegenschein from lunar orbit, and of the Moon itself on the journey back to Earth. Some of this photography was to be performed by Swigert as Lovell and Haise walked on the Moon.Lagrangian points of the Earth-Moon system. Apollo 13 had twelve cameras on board, including those for television and moving pictures.bistatic radar observations of the Moon. None of these was attempted because of the accident.

The mission was launched at the planned time, 2:13:00 pm EST (19:13:00 UTC) on April 11. An anomaly occurred when the second-stage, center (inboard) engine shut down about two minutes early.pogo oscillations. Starting with Apollo 10, the vehicle"s guidance system was designed to shut the engine down in response to chamber pressure excursions.Titan rockets (used during the Gemini program) and on previous Apollo missions,cavitation.S-IVB third stage burned longer to compensate, and the vehicle achieved very close to the planned circular 190 kilometers (100 nmi) parking orbit, followed by a translunar injection (TLI) about two hours later, setting the mission on course for the Moon.

After TLI, Swigert performed the separation and transposition maneuvers before docking the CSM Odyssey to the LM Aquarius, and the spacecraft pulled away from the third stage.

The crew settled in for the three-day trip to Fra Mauro. At 30:40:50 into the mission, with the TV camera running, the crew performed a burn to place Apollo 13 on a hybrid trajectory. The departure from a free-return trajectory meant that if no further burns were performed, Apollo 13 would miss Earth on its return trajectory, rather than intercept it, as with a free return.federal income tax return (due April 15), and amid laughter from mission controllers, asked how he could get an extension. He was found to be entitled to a 60-day extension for being out of the country at the deadline.

Entry into the LM to test its systems had been scheduled for 58:00:00; when the crew awoke on the third day of the mission, they were informed it had been moved up three hours and was later moved up again by another hour. A television broadcast was scheduled for 55:00:00; Lovell, acting as emcee, showed the audience the interiors of Odyssey and Aquarius.

Lovell"s initial thought on hearing the noise was that Haise had activated the LM"s cabin-repressurization valve, which also produced a bang (Haise enjoyed doing so to startle his crewmates), but Lovell could see that Haise had no idea what had happened. Swigert initially thought that a meteoroid might have struck the LM, but he and Lovell quickly realized there was no leak.voltage produced by the SM"s three fuel cells (fueled by hydrogen and oxygen piped from their respective tanks) to the second of the SM"s two electric power distribution systems. Almost everything in the CSM required power. Although the bus momentarily returned to normal status, soon both buses A and B were short on voltage. Haise checked the status of the fuel cells and found that two of them were dead. Mission rules forbade entering lunar orbit unless all fuel cells were operational.

In the minutes after the accident, there were several unusual readings, showing that tank2 was empty and tank1"s pressure slowly falling, that the computer on the spacecraft had reset and that the high-gain antenna was not working. Liebergot initially missed the worrying signs from tank2 following the stir, as he was focusing on tank1, believing that its reading would be a good guide to what was present in tank2; so did controllers supporting him in the "back room". When Kranz questioned Liebergot on this, he initially responded that there might be false readings due to an instrumentation problem; he was often teased about that in the years to come.

Since the fuel cells needed oxygen to operate, when Oxygen Tank1 ran dry, the remaining fuel cell would shut down, meaning the CSM"s only significant sources of power and oxygen would be the CM"s batteries and its oxygen "surge tank". These would be needed for the final hours of the mission, but the remaining fuel cell, already starved for oxygen, was drawing from the surge tank. Kranz ordered the surge tank isolated, saving its oxygen, but this meant that the remaining fuel cell would die within two hours, as the oxygen in tank1 was consumed or leaked away.

This depiction of a direct abort (from a 1966 planning report) contemplates returning from a point much earlier in the mission, and closer to Earth, than where the Apollo 13 accident occurred.

A key decision was the choice of return path. A "direct abort" would use the SM"s main engine (the Service Propulsion System or SPS) to return before reaching the Moon. However, the accident could have damaged the SPS, and the fuel cells would have to last at least another hour to meet its power requirements, so Kranz instead decided on a longer route: the spacecraft would swing around the Moon before heading back to Earth. Apollo 13 was on the hybrid trajectory which was to take it to Fra Mauro; it now needed to be brought back to a free return. The LM"s Descent Propulsion System (DPS), although not as powerful as the SPS, could do this, but new software for Mission Control"s computers needed to be written by technicians as it had never been contemplated that the CSM/LM spacecraft would have to be maneuvered from the LM. As the CM was being shut down, Lovell copied down its guidance system"s orientation information and performed hand calculations to transfer it to the LM"s guidance system, which had been turned off; at his request Mission Control checked his figures.

The change would get Apollo 13 back to Earth in about four days" time – though with splashdown in the Indian Ocean, where NASA had few recovery forces. Jerry Bostick and other Flight Dynamics Officers (FIDOs) were anxious both to shorten the travel time and to move splashdown to the Pacific Ocean, where the main recovery forces were located. One option would shave 36 hours off the return time, but required jettisoning the SM; this would expose the CM"s heat shield to space during the return journey, something for which it had not been designed. The FIDOs also proposed other solutions. After a meeting involving NASA officials and engineers, the senior individual present, Manned Spaceflight Center director Robert R. Gilruth, decided on a burn using the DPS, that would save 12 hours and land Apollo 13 in the Pacific. This "PC+2" burn would take place two hours after pericynthion, the closest approach to the Moon.Guinness Book of World Records), which still stands, for the highest absolute altitude attained by a crewed spacecraft: 400,171 kilometers (248,655 mi) from Earth at 7:21 pm EST, April 14 (00:21:00 UTC April 15).

The LM"s stock of canisters, meant to accommodate two astronauts for 45 hours on the Moon, was not enough to support three astronauts for the return journey to Earth.Joseph Kerwin over the course of an hour, and it was built by Swigert and Haise; carbon dioxide levels began dropping immediately. Lovell later described this improvisation as "a fine example of cooperation between ground and space".

Recognizing that the cold conditions combined with insufficient rest would hinder the time critical startup of the command module prior to reentry, at 133 hours into flight Mission Control gave Lovell the okay to fully power up the LM to raise the cabin temperature, which included restarting the LM"s guidance computer. Having the LM"s computer running enabled Lovell to perform a navigational sighting and calibrate the LM"s IMU. With the lunar module"s computer aware of its location and orientation, the command module"s computer was later calibrated in a reverse of the normal procedures used to set up the LM, shaving steps from the restart process and increasing the accuracy of the PGNCS-controlled reentry.

Despite the accuracy of the transearth injection, the spacecraft slowly drifted off course, necessitating a correction. As the LM"s guidance system had been shut down following the PC+2 burn, the crew was told to use the line between night and day on the Earth to guide them, a technique used on NASA"s Earth-orbit missions but never on the way back from the Moon.reaction control system (RCS) thrusters, for 21.5 seconds. The SM was jettisoned less than half an hour later, allowing the crew to see the damage for the first time, and photograph it. They reported that an entire panel was missing from the SM"s exterior, the fuel cells above the oxygen tank shelf were tilted, that the high-gain antenna was damaged, and there was a considerable amount of debris elsewhere.

En route to Honolulu, President Nixon stopped at Houston to award the Presidential Medal of Freedom to the Apollo 13 Mission Operations Team.Thomas O. Paine, but Paine recommended the mission operations team.

Worldwide interest in the Apollo program was reawakened by the incident; television coverage was seen by millions. Four Soviet ships headed toward the landing area to assist if needed,Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Maryland, where Apollo"s tracking and communications were coordinated.

The rescue received more public attention than any spaceflight to that point, other than the first Moon landing on Apollo 11. There were worldwide headlines, and people surrounded television sets to get the latest developments, offered by networks who interrupted their regular programming for bulletins. Pope Paul VI led a congregation of 10,000 people in praying for the astronauts" safe return; ten times that number offered prayers at a religious festival in India.United States Senate on April 14 passed a resolution urging businesses to pause at 9:00pm local time that evening to allow for employee prayer.

Immediately upon the crew"s return, NASA Administrator Paine and Deputy Administrator George Low appointed a review board – chaired by NASA Langley Research Center Director Edgar M. Cortright and including Neil Armstrong and six others2 oxygen tank.Teflon insulation on the wires to the stirring fan inside Oxygen Tank2 allowed the wires to short circuit and ignite this insulation. The resulting fire increased the pressure inside the tank until the tank dome failed, filling the fuel cell bay (SM Sector4) with rapidly expanding gaseous oxygen and combustion products. The pressure rise was sufficient to pop the rivets holding the aluminum exterior panel covering Sector4 and blow it out, exposing the sector to space and snuffing out the fire. The detached panel hit the nearby high-gain antenna, disabling the narrow-beam communication mode and interrupting communication with Earth for 1.8 seconds while the system automatically switched to the backup wide-beam mode.4, the force on the CM"s heat shield would have separated the two modules. The report questioned the use of Teflon and other materials shown to be flammable in supercritical oxygen, such as aluminum, within the tank.

Mechanical shock forced the oxygen valves closed on the number1 and number3 fuel cells, putting them out of commission.2 compromised Oxygen Tank1, causing its contents to leak out, possibly through a damaged line or valve, over the next 130 minutes, entirely depleting the SM"s oxygen supply.

The Countdown Demonstration Test took place with SM-109 in its place near the top of the Saturn V and began on March 16, 1970. During the test, the cryogenic tanks were filled, but Oxygen Tank 2 could not be emptied through the normal drain line, and a report was written documenting the problem. After discussion among NASA and the contractors, attempts to empty the tank resumed on March 27. When it would not empty normally, the heaters in the tank were turned on to boil off the oxygen. The thermostatic switches were designed to prevent the heaters from raising the temperature higher than 27 °C (80 °F), but they failed under the 65-volt power supply applied. Temperatures on the heater tube within the tank may have reached 540 °C (1,000 °F), most likely damaging the Teflon insulation.2 fan at the request of Mission Control caused an electric arc that set the tank on fire.

For Apollo 14 and subsequent missions, the oxygen tank was redesigned, the thermostats being upgraded to handle the proper voltage. The heaters were retained since they were necessary to maintain oxygen pressure. The stirring fans, with their unsealed motors, were removed, which meant the oxygen quantity gauge was no longer accurate. This required adding a third tank so that no tank would go below half full.1 of the SM, on the side opposite the other two, and was given an isolation valve that could isolate it from the fuel cells and from the other two oxygen tanks in an emergency and allow it to feed the CM"s environmental system only. The quantity probe was upgraded from aluminum to stainless steel.

All electrical wiring in Bay4 was sheathed in stainless steel. The fuel cell oxygen supply valves were redesigned to isolate the Teflon-coated wiring from the oxygen. The spacecraft and Mission Control monitoring systems were modified to give more immediate and visible warnings of anomalies.

None of the Apollo 13 astronauts flew in space again. Lovell retired from NASA and the Navy in 1973, entering the private sector.Apollo–Soyuz Test Project (the first joint mission with the Soviet Union) but was removed as part of the fallout from the Apollo 15 postal covers incident. He took a leave of absence from NASA in 1973 and left the agency to enter politics, being elected to the House of Representatives in 1982, but died of cancer before he could be sworn in.Apollo 19 mission, and flew the Space Shuttle Approach and Landing Tests before retiring from NASA in 1979.

Several experiments were completed during Apollo 13, even though the mission did not land on the Moon.S-IVB (the Saturn V"s third stage), which on prior missions had been sent into solar orbit once detached. The seismometer left by Apollo 12 had detected frequent impacts of small objects onto the Moon, but larger impacts would yield more information about the Moon"s crust, so it was decided that, beginning with Apollo 13, the S-IVB would be crashed into the Moon.synchronous satellites, achieved the desired results.

The CM was disassembled for testing and parts remained in storage for years; some were used for a trainer for the Skylab Rescue Mission. That trainer was subsequently displayed at the Kentucky Science Center. Max Ary of the Cosmosphere made it a project to restore Odyssey; it is on display there, in Hutchinson, Kansas.

Apollo 13 was called a "successful failure" by Lovell.Mike Massimino, a Space Shuttle astronaut, stated that Apollo 13 "showed teamwork, camaraderie and what NASA was really made of".Colin Burgess wrote, "the life-or-death flight of Apollo 13 dramatically evinced the colossal risks inherent in manned spaceflight. Then, with the crew safely back on Earth, public apathy set in once again."

William R. Compton, in his book about the Apollo Program, said of Apollo 13, "Only a heroic effort of real-time improvisation by mission operations teams saved the crew."Milt Heflin, in their history of Mission Control, stated, "Apollo 13 proved mission control could bring those space voyagers back home again when their lives were on the line."Roger D. Launius wrote, "More than any other incident in the history of spaceflight, recovery from this accident solidified the world"s belief in NASA"s capabilities".Apollo 17 in December 1972.

Following the flight, the crew planned to write a book, but they all left NASA without starting it. After Lovell retired in 1991, he was approached by journalist Jeffrey Kluger about writing a non-fiction account of the mission. Swigert died in 1982 and Haise was no longer interested in such a project. The resultant book,

The next year, in 1995, a film adaptation of the book, Ron Howard and starring Tom Hanks as Lovell, Bill Paxton as Haise, Kevin Bacon as Swigert, Gary Sinise as Mattingly, Ed Harris as Kranz, and Kathleen Quinlan as Marilyn Lovell. James Lovell, Kranz, and other principals have stated that this film depicted the events of the mission with reasonable accuracy, given that some dramatic license was taken. For example, the film changes the tense of Lovell"s famous follow-up to Swigert"s original words from, "Houston, we"ve had a problem" to "Houston, we have a problem".Failure is not an option", uttered by Harris as Kranz in the film; the phrase became so closely associated with Kranz that he used it for the title of his 2000 autobiography.

In 2020, the BBC World Service began airing 13 Minutes to the Moon, radio programs which draw on NASA audio from the mission, as well as archival and recent interviews with participants. Episodes began airing for Season 2 starting on March 8, 2020, with episode 1, "Time bomb: Apollo 13", explaining the launch and the explosion. Episode 2 details Mission Control"s denial and disbelief of the accident, with other episodes covering other aspects of the mission. The seventh and final episode was delayed due to the COVID-19 pandemic. In "Delay to Episode 7", the BBC explained that the presenter of the series, medical doctor Kevin Fong, had been called into service.

In advance of the 50th anniversary of the mission in 2020, an Apollo in Real Time site for the mission went online, allowing viewers to follow along as the mission unfolds, view photographs and video, and listen to audio of conversations between Houston and the astronauts as well as between mission controllers.Apollo 13: Home Safe on April 10, 2020.

The record was set because the Moon was nearly at its furthest from Earth during the mission. Apollo 13"s unique free return trajectory caused it to go approximately 100 kilometers (60 mi) further from the lunar far side than other Apollo lunar missions, but this was a minor contribution to the record.

The others were Robert F. Allnutt (Assistant to the Administrator, NASA Hqs.); John F. Clark (Director, Goddard Space Flight Center); Brig. General Walter R. Hedrick Jr. (Director of Space, DCS/RED, Hqs., USAF); Vincent L. Johnson (Deputy Associate Administrator-Engineering, Office of Space Science and Applications); Milton Klein (Manager, AEC-NASA Space Nuclear Propulsion Office); Hans M. Mark (Director, Ames Research Center).

Williams, Mike (September 13, 2012). "A legendary tale, well-told". Rice University Office of Public Affairs. Archived from the original on August 17, 2020. Retrieved October 5, 2019.

Howell, Elizabeth; Hickok, Kimberly (March 31, 2020). "Apollo 13: The moon-mission that dodged disaster". Space.com. Future US. Retrieved April 1, 2020.

"Oral History Transcript" (PDF) (Interview). Johnson Space Center Oral History Project. Interviewed by Kevin M. Rusnak. Houston, Texas: NASA. July 17, 2000. pp. 12-25–12-26. Archived from the original (PDF) on May 1, 2019.

Dotson, Kirk (Winter 2003–2004). "Mitigating Pogo on Liquid-Fueled Rockets" (PDF). Crosslink. El Segundo, California: The Aerospace Corporation. 5 (1): 26–29. Archived (PDF) from the original on October 9, 2022. Retrieved July 3, 2013.

Foerman, Paul; Thompson, Lacy, eds. (April 2010). "Apollo 13 – NASA"s "successful failure"" (PDF). Lagniappe. Hancock County, Mississippi: John C. Stennis Space Center. 5 (4): 5–7. Archived (PDF) from the original on October 9, 2022. Retrieved July 4, 2013.

Brooks, Courtney G.; Grimwood, James M.; Swenson, Loyd S. Jr. (1979). Chariots for Apollo: A History of Manned Lunar Spacecraft (PDF). NASA History Series. Washington, D.C.: Scientific and Technical Information Branch, NASA. ISBN 978-0-486-46756-6. LCCN 79001042. OCLC 4664449. NASA SP-4205. Archived (PDF) from the original on October 9, 2022.

Burgess, Colin (2019). Shattered Dreams: The Lost and Canceled Space Missions (eBook ed.). Lincoln, Nebraska: University of Nebraska Press. ISBN 978-1-4962-1422-5.

Compton, William David (1989). Where No Man has Gone Before: A History of Apollo Lunar Exploration Missions. NASA History Series. Washington, D.C.: NASA. OCLC 1045558568. SP-4214.

Flight Control Division (April 1970). Mission Operations Report (PDF). Houston, Texas: NASA Manned Spacecraft Center. Archived (PDF) from the original on October 9, 2022.

Houston, Rick; Heflin, J. Milt; Aaron, John (2015). Go, Flight!: the Unsung Heroes of Mission Control, 1965–1992 (eBook ed.). Lincoln, Nebraska: University of Nebraska Press. ISBN 978-0-8032-8494-4.

Larsen, Curtis E. (May 22, 2008). NASA Experience with Pogo in Human Spaceflight Vehicles (PDF). NATO RTO Symposium ATV-152 on Limit-Cycle Oscillations and Other Amplitude-Limited, Self-Excited Vibrations. NASA Johnson Space Center. Norway. RTO-MP-AVT-152. Archived (PDF) from the original on October 9, 2022.

Launius, Roger D. (2019). Reaching for the Moon: A Short History of the Space Race (eBook ed.). New Haven, Connecticut: Yale University Press. ISBN 978-0-300-24516-5.

Mission Evaluation Team (September 1970). Apollo 13 Mission Report (PDF). Houston, Texas: NASA Manned Spacecraft Center. MSC-02680. Archived (PDF) from the original on October 9, 2022.

That specific design sensibility, while celebrated today, once presented a challenge for the couple. When they approached corporations for licensing deals, they were often told that their bedding wouldn’t work in a mainstream context. “We tried for years,” says Hays, “and found that there wasn’t really a space for us.” But they remained persistent, eventually landing a partnership with Perigold, and subsequently Wayfair.