china octg pup joint in stock

One is a short Drill Pipe used to adjust the length of the Drill String; The other one OCTG Pup Joint is a pipe of non-standard length, which is used to adjust the length of tubular strings to its exact requirement.

Vigor can manufacture the Tubing Pup Joints by different technology - Upsetting and Machining process. if you have a special requirement on the Pup Joint production process, please just specify.

If you are looking for a competitive, high quality and fast delivery oilfield pup joint in stock, or if you are planning to buy pup joint API from one of the leading casing and tubing pup joint manufacturers, API 5CT pup joint in stock, l8013cr pup joint, nue/nue tubing pup joint manufacturers and suppliers China, please feel free to contact VIGOR.Details  of  API  Spec.  5CT  Oil  Tubing  Pup  Joint

OCTG Pup Joints is one kind of common accessories for connection with casing and tubing. Threaded pup joints are divided into male threaded ends, single male threaded and Female threaded. The size and material is the same as the casing or tubing.

China N80 Pup Joint Manufacturer Derbo Supplies N80 Pup Joint, Hot Rolled, 1.66 Inch, EUE 2.40lb/ft, Oiled, Painting Finish, for Oil & Gas Industries.

Pup joints are manufactured from seamless mechanical tube. As with all products, each piece is marked with a distinctive heat number that is fully traceable. A complete range of sizes (1" to 4.5"), weights (standard or heavy wall), and grades (J-55, N-80, L-80, and P-110) are commonly available from stock in 2", 3", 4", 6" and 10" lengths. Other lengths are available upon request.

CountryAfghanistanAland IslandsAlbaniaAlgeriaAmerican SamoaAndorraAngolaAnguillaAntarcticaAntigua and BarbudaArgentinaArmeniaArubaAustraliaAustriaAzerbaijanBahamasBahrainBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBeninBermudaBhutanBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBotswanaBouvet IslandBrazilBritish Indian Ocean TerritoryBritish Virgin IslandsBruneiBulgariaBurkina FasoBurundiCambodiaCameroonCanadaCape VerdeCayman IslandsCentral African RepublicChadChileChinaChristmas IslandCocos (Keeling) IslandsColombiaComorosCongo (Brazzaville)Congo (Kinshasa)Cook IslandsCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCuraçaoCyprusCzech RepublicDenmarkDjiboutiDominicaDominican RepublicEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEquatorial GuineaEritreaEstoniaEthiopiaFalkland IslandsFaroe IslandsFijiFinlandFranceFrench GuianaFrench PolynesiaFrench Southern TerritoriesGabonGambiaGeorgiaGermanyGhanaGibraltarGreeceGreenlandGrenadaGuadeloupeGuamGuatemalaGuernseyGuineaGuinea-BissauGuyanaHaitiHeard Island and McDonald IslandsHondurasHong Kong S.A.R., ChinaHungaryIcelandIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsle of ManIsraelItalyIvory CoastJamaicaJapanJerseyJordanKazakhstanKenyaKiribatiKuwaitKyrgyzstanLaosLatviaLebanonLesothoLiberiaLibyaLiechtensteinLithuaniaLuxembourgMacao S.A.R., ChinaMacedoniaMadagascarMalawiMalaysiaMaldivesMaliMaltaMarshall IslandsMartiniqueMauritaniaMauritiusMayotteMexicoMicronesiaMoldovaMonacoMongoliaMontenegroMontserratMoroccoMozambiqueMyanmarNamibiaNauruNepalNetherlandsNetherlands AntillesNew CaledoniaNew ZealandNicaraguaNigerNigeriaNiueNorfolk IslandNorthern Mariana IslandsNorth KoreaNorwayOmanPakistanPalauPalestinian TerritoryPanamaPapua New GuineaParaguayPeruPhilippinesPitcairnPolandPortugalPuerto RicoQatarReunionRomaniaRussiaRwandaSaint BarthélemySaint HelenaSaint Kitts and NevisSaint LuciaSaint Martin (French part)Saint Pierre and MiquelonSaint Vincent and the GrenadinesSamoaSan MarinoSao Tome and PrincipeSaudi ArabiaSenegalSerbiaSeychellesSierra LeoneSingaporeSlovakiaSloveniaSolomon IslandsSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth Georgia and the South Sandwich IslandsSouth KoreaSpainSri LankaSudanSurinameSvalbard and Jan MayenSwazilandSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanTajikistanTanzaniaThailandTimor-LesteTogoTokelauTongaTrinidad and TobagoTunisiaTurkeyTurkmenistanTurks and Caicos IslandsTuvaluU.S. Virgin IslandsUgandaUkraineUnited Arab EmiratesUnited KingdomUnited StatesUnited States Minor Outlying IslandsUruguayUzbekistanVanuatuVaticanVenezuelaVietnamWallis and FutunaWestern SaharaYemenZambiaZimbabwe

The drill pipe joint is an important connecting part of the oil drill pipe and drilling tool, and is widely used in the oil drilling industry. Our pup joint drilling is finished with high-quality and unique materials for excellent durability and precise dimensional accuracy. The threads on the fittings are cut on a CNC machine, which ensures high precision of the threads and prolongs the service life of the fittings. Considering the specificity in practical applications, we use phosphate coating or copper plating to enhance the wear and chemical resistance of the joint. This pup joint drilling has good mechanical strength and comprehensive performance and meets international standards, it can be widely used in oil, natural gas, sewage treatment and other industries.

Outside Diameter of Tubing Joint: From 2-3/8"(60 3mm) to 4.5"(114.60mm) Pipe End: EUE/NUE Outside Diameter of Casing Joint: From 4-12"(114 3mm) to 20*(508mm)

PUP JOINT DRILLING, PUP JOINT INC, PUP JOINT, PUP JOINT OIL AND GAS, NPST PUP JOINT, API PUP JOINT DIMENSIONS, PUP JOINTS FOR SALE. DRILL, API, API 5CT, CASING, EUE, PIPELINES, TUBING,

Hot Tags: pup joint drilling, China, suppliers, manufacturers, factory, low price, for sale, in stock, made in China, ERW Structural Pipe, Socket Weld Cap, Class150 Blind Flange, Api 5l Line Pipe, Steel Pipe Reducer, Oil Casing and Tubing

A pup joint is Casing, Pipe or Tubing shorter in length than a standard tubular string. This allows for the adjustment and installation of tools and various tubular components when placement downhole is critical for a specific project. A Spacer Pipe is another reference used to identify pup joints. Pup joint features consist of connections, lengths, weights and material grade.

Tubing pup joints are desiged and manufactured as per API 5CT to be used be adjust height of tubings, and tubing pup joints are made of seamless steel tubings. Material grade of tubing pup joint can be avalialbe in J55, K55, N80, L80 or P110, sizes of tubing pup joint range from 2⅜¡± to 4½¡±, thread of pup joint can be 8RD, 10RD or BTC, and end connection types can be NUE and EUE. length of tubing pup joint are often offered in 2ft, 3ft, 4ft, 6ft, 8ft, 10ft and 12ft, length of pup joint for special purpose can be available as per order. Tubing pup joints are machined with interchangeable Pin & Box thread on two ends or other configuration, one end is equipped with coupling, and another end is protected with closed end thread protector. Nominal weight of tubing pup joint is the same as tubing. Tubing pup joints are internally and externally hydrostatic tested with tension and compression loads, and torque tested, electromagnetically inspected, pup joint is full-body drift and straightness visual inspected, and phosphated and dye-penetrant inspected. and finally painted by machine to ensure excellenct appearance. Finished tubing pup joints are often packed by steel belts in bundles, and then fixed in steel rack for easy transportation.

Casing pup joints are desiged and manufactured as per API 5CT to be used be adjust height of casings, and casing pup joints are made of seamless steel casings. Material grade of casing pup joint can be avalialbe in J55, K55, N80, L80 or P110, sizes of casing pup joint range from 4½¡± to 13⅜¡±, thread of pup joint can be 8RD, 10RD or BTC, length of tubing pup joint are often offered in 2ft, 3ft, 4ft, 6ft, 8ft, 10ft and 12ft, length of pup joint for special purpose can be available as per order. Casing pup joints are machined with interchangeable Pin & Box thread on two ends or other configuration, one end is equipped with coupling, and another end is protected with closed end thread protector. Nominal weight of casing pup joint is the same as casing. Casing pup joints are internally and externally hydrostatic tested with tension and compression loads, and torque tested, electromagnetically inspected, pup joint is full-body drift and straightness visual inspected, and phosphated and dye-penetrant inspected. and finally painted by machine to ensure excellenct appearance. Finished casing pup joints are often packed by steel belts in bundles, and then fixed in steel rack for easy transportation.

OCTG API tubing, API 5CT casing, coupling stock and pup joint are indispensable in the well construction. Our API 5CT products have received API 5CT, ISO9001:2000 and ISO14001:2004 certifications. With about 30 years" production experience, Jiangyin Changjiang Steel Tube Making Factory has become a specialized manufacturer of steel pipes in China. We are capable of manufacturing high-quality API tubing and API 5CT casing for clients. They are well received and highly appraised by customers both home and abroad.

API 5CT Pup JointA pup joint is a pipe without standard length. API SPEC 5CT pup joints are used to adjust the height of full length tubing or casing strings to exact requirement. They are also applied to adjust the depth of downhole tools. In order to ...

Jiangyin Changjiang Steel Tube Making Factory is a leading supplier and exporter of seamless steel tubes and various special pipes. We mainly manufacture OCTG API tubing, API 5CT casing, coupling stock, pup joint, structure pipe, fluid pipe, high pressure boiler pipe, API pipe, marine pipe, alloy pipe, line pipe, etc. Our company sets up a steel tube technology R & D center with advanced pipe testing equipment. Through strict testing process, we are able to produce superb steel pipes for customers. Our products have been exported to Europe, CIS, Southeast Asia, Africa, South America, North America, Australia, the Middle East, and many other countries and regions.

Where it is alleged that the conditions of PMS resulted from the acquisition of inputs with distorted costs, the CBSA conducted an analysis of such costs. In this regard, hot‑rolled coil (HRC) and billet are, respectively, substantial inputs used in the production of welded and seamless OCTG. In order to analyze costs of HRC and billet, the CBSA relied on complete information provided by participating exporters, but also relied on published pricing from Fastmarkets Metal Bulletin (Fastmarkets MB). Fastmarkets MB is one of the world’s leading data providers which reports metal and steel prices from around the globe.

As a result, normal values for Chung Hung were determined pursuant to section 29 of SIMA using a paragraph 19(b) methodology, based on the aggregate of the cost of production of the goods, a reasonable amount for administrative, selling and all other costs plus a reasonable amount for profits. As inputs significant in the production of the goods were acquired from associated suppliers, the cost of the inputs significant in the production of the goods was determined pursuant to subparagraph 11.2(1)(c)(i) of the SIMR. The amount for profits was determined based on the weighted average profit made on domestic sales of OCTG by other exporters from other countries who provided a complete response in this re‑investigation, pursuant to ministerial specification.

Shin Yang, located in Kaohsiung, the Separate Customs Territory of Taiwan, Penghu, Kinmen and Matsu (Chinese Taipei), was a manufacturer of OCTG. They did not have any sales of subject goods to Canada during the POI/PAP. The company provided a substantially complete response to the CBSA’s RFI and a supplementary RFI.

Therefore, normal values were determined pursuant to section 29 of SIMA, using a paragraph 19(b) methodology, based on the aggregate of the cost of production of goods, a reasonable amount for administrative, selling and all other costs plus a reasonable amount for profits. The amount for profits was determined based on the weighted average profit made on domestic sales of OCTG by other exporters from other countries who provided a complete response in this re‑investigation, pursuant to ministerial specification.

Tension Steel was a manufacturer and exporter of subject goods to Canada during the POI. The goods were manufactured at the company’s production facilities in Kaohsiung, the Separate Customs Territory of Taiwan, Penghu, Kinmen and Matsu (Chinese Taipei). Tension Steel did not have domestic sales of OCTG during the POI/ PAP. Tension Steel provided substantially complete responses to the CBSA’s RFI and supplementary RFIs and an on‑site verification of Tension Steel was conducted in January 2020.

With respect to Tension Steel, normal values could not be determined pursuant to section 15 of SIMA as Tension Steel did not have domestic sales of OCTG during the POI. Normal values could also not be determined pursuant to paragraph 19(b) of SIMA because a reasonable amount for profits could not be determined under paragraph 11(1)(b) of the SIMR. While determining normal values pursuant to paragraph 19(a) of SIMA was considered, due to the lack of evidence on the record to demonstrate that like goods sold by Tension Steel to importers in any country other than Canada reflected the market value of the goods, the CBSA decided to follow alternative provisions of SIMA to determine normal values.

Therefore, normal values were determined pursuant to section 29 of SIMA using a paragraph 19(b) methodology, based on the aggregate of the cost of production of the goods, a reasonable amount for administrative, selling and all other costs plus a reasonable amount for profits. The amount for profits was determined based on the weighted average profit made on domestic sales of OCTG by other exporters from other countries who provided a complete response in this re‑investigation, pursuant to ministerial specification.

The CBSA conducted an analysis to determine whether the presence of SOEs or government support programs led to conditions of the alleged PMS. The Indian responding exporters sold the majority of subject goods to SOEs. However, all OCTG purchases by SOEs in India are strictly based on a formal tendering process, which is open internationally. The CBSA notes that this is not an uncommon practice in the OCTG industry internationally and the fact that the domestic OCTG market in India is largely comprised of SOEs does not necessarily indicate that pricing is distorted.

Aside from the presence of SOEs, there are subsidies for steel and OCTG in place in India. However, there is no evidence on the record that indicates these subsidies enable steel or OCTG producers to sell products at distorted prices. Based on an examination of the information provided by the complainants, GOI, and responding exporters, the CBSA was unable to determine that there was sufficient evidence to establish that the presence of SOEs or government support programs had a significant enough influence on domestic selling prices such that a proper comparison could not be made.

In addition, the CBSA also conducted an analysis as to whether PMS resulted from acquisition of inputs at distorted prices. During the POI, exporters in India purchased billets or round bar from suppliers located in India and China. Monthly purchase prices of the inputs from China and India were calculated based on the information provided by responding exporters and compared with published Fastmarkets MB monthly prices of billets in other regions, including Turkey, Southeast Asia, Latin America and Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS). The price analysis revealed that the monthly prices of Indian and Chinese billets and round bar are in line and higher than the monthly prices published in Fastmarkets MB. Further, the CBSA has examined the input price information provided by the complainants and finds that there is insufficient evidence that Indian OCTG producers are benefitting from production inputs or processing services that do not reflect market‑based costs.

GVN is an exporter of subject goods sold to Canada during the POI based out of Haryana, India. These goods were produced by MSL, an associated company based out of Maharashtra, India which also produces like goods sold domestically. As the export trading arm of MSL, GVN is not a producer and it does not have any production facility. MSL manufactures both seamless and electronic resistance welded (ERW) OCTG products and sells these goods exclusively in its domestic market while GVN sells MSL’s OCTG products exclusively in export markets, including Canada. Due to the relationship between GVN and MSL and their roles and responsibilities during the production and exportation process, the companies have collectively been determined to be the exporter for SIMA purposes. GVN & MSL provided substantially complete responses to the CBSA’s RFI and supplementary RFIs, and an on‑site verification of GVN & MSL were conducted in January 2020 in India.

ISMT is a manufacturer of OCTG located in Maharashtra, India. No subject goods were shipped to Canada during the POI. The exporter provided substantially complete responses to the CBSA’s RFI and supplementary RFIs throughout the re‑investigation.

JSL is a manufacturer of OCTG located in Nashik, India. No subject goods were shipped to Canada during the POI. JSL provided substantially complete responses to the CBSA’s RFI and supplementary RFIs, and an on‑site verification of JSL was conducted in January 2020.

The CBSA conducted an analysis to determine if the conditions of alleged PMS resulted from government influence. Oil and gas companies located in Indonesia are required to comply with the procurement procedures set by Special Task Force for Upstream Oil and Gas Business Activities which adopt the optimization of local products utilization principle. According to the government of Indonesia, the procurement procedure also provides the opportunity for the suppliers and the purchasers to negotiate the price. As such, SOE purchasers of OCTG in Indonesia buy OCTG products from the best candidates who participated in the tenders. The CBSA found that there was insufficient evidence that local content requirements imposed by the government and the existence of SOE purchasers have a material impact on domestic selling prices of OCTG such that a proper comparison is not possible.

In addition, the CBSA conducted an analysis to determine whether PMS resulted from acquisition of imported inputs at distorted prices. Based on the information on the administrative record, the CBSA examined the prices paid by PTCT to unrelated suppliers located in China, Indonesia, Japan and South Korea of substantial inputs used in the production process. The result showed that, during the POI, acquisition costs of inputs from unrelated suppliers located in China were inline with prices paid to unrelated suppliers located in the other countries analysed. Therefore, the CBSA found there was insufficient evidence to conclude that the costs of these inputs acquired by PTCT were distorted.

Normal values could not be determined pursuant to section 15 of SIMA as HLD Clark did not have domestic sales of OCTG during the POI. Furthermore, no other producers/exporters of subject goods in the Philippines provided a response to the CBSA’s RFI. As such, normal values could not be determined pursuant to paragraph 19(b) of SIMA because a reasonable amount for profits could not be determined under paragraph 11(1)(b) of the SIMR. While determining normal values pursuant to paragraph 19(a) of SIMA was considered, due to the lack of evidence on the record to demonstrate that like goods sold by Chung Hung to importers in any country other than Canada reflected the market value of the goods, the CBSA decided to follow alternative provisions of SIMA to determine normal values.

As a result, normal values were determined pursuant to section 29 of SIMA using a paragraph 19(b) methodology, based on the aggregate of the cost of production of the goods, a reasonable amount for administrative, selling and all other costs plus a reasonable amount for profits. The amount for profits was determined based on the weighted average profit made on domestic sales of OCTG by other exporters who provided a complete response in this re‑investigation, pursuant to ministerial specification.

The CBSA conducted an analysis to determine whether government influence through SOEs led to conditions of the alleged PMS. Based on the information on the administrative record, there are three OCTG producers in Thailand and none of them are SOEs. In addition, none of the hot‑rolled coil and billet producers identified by the Government of Thailand (GOT) are SOEs. Respecting OCTG purchasers in Thailand, the GOT identified 50 non‑SOE petroleum concessionaires and one SOE end‑user (i.e. PTT Exploration and Production Company (PTTEP)) in Thailand. PTTEP is a major OCTG purchaser in Thailand. The GOT explained that the Board of directors at PTTEP are appointed by PTTEP’s shareholders and the Board is responsible for company performance and oversees its management. There are no GOT representatives on the Board and the GOT is not involved in PTTEP’s decision making process.

In addition, the CBSA also conducted an analysis as to whether PMS resulted from acquisition of imported inputs at distorted prices. During the POI, the responding exporters in Thailand imported billets from suppliers located in both China and India. Monthly purchase prices of the inputs from China and India were calculated based on the information provided by responding exporters and compared with published Fastmarkets MB monthly prices of billets in other regions, including Southeast Asia, Latin America and CIS. The price analysis revealed that the monthly prices of Chinese and Indian billets are in line with input prices from responding exporters in other countries and higher than the prices published in Fastmarkets MB. Further, the CBSA has examined the input price information provided by the complainants and finds that there is insufficient evidence that Thai OCTG producers are benefitting from production inputs that do not reflect market‑based costs.

As a result, normal values were determined pursuant to section 29 of SIMA, using a paragraph 19(b) methodology, based on the aggregate of the cost of production of the goods, a reasonable amount for administrative, selling and all other costs plus a reasonable amount for profits. The amount for profits was determined based on the weighted average profit made on domestic sales of OCTG by other exporters who provided a complete response in this re‑investigation, pursuant to ministerial specification.

Thai Oil Pipe Co., Ltd. (TOP) is a producer of OCTG, located in Rayong, Thailand. No subject goods were shipped to Canada during the POI. TOP provided substantially complete responses to the CBSA’s RFI and supplementary RFIs.

Normal values could not be determined pursuant to section 15 of SIMA as TOP did not have domestic sales of OCTG during the POI. Normal values could also not be determined pursuant to paragraph 19(b) of SIMA because a reasonable amount for profits could not be determined under paragraph 11(1)(b) of the SIMR. While determining normal values pursuant to paragraph 19(a) of SIMA was considered, due to the lack of evidence on the record to demonstrate that like goods sold by TOP to importers in any country other than Canada reflected the market value of the goods, the CBSA decided to follow alternative provisions of SIMA to determine normal values.

As a result, normal values were determined pursuant to section 29 of SIMA, using the methodology of paragraph 19(b) of SIMA, based on the aggregate of the cost of production of the goods, a reasonable amount for administrative, selling and all other costs plus a reasonable amount for profits. The amount for profits was determined based on the weighted average profit made on domestic sales of OCTG by other exporters who provided a complete response in this re‑investigation, pursuant to ministerial specification.

The CBSA conducted an analysis to determine whether the conditions of alleged PMS resulted from the influence of SOEs and that PMS otherwise resulted from the acquisition of imported inputs at distorted prices. Based on the CBSA’s analysis of the information on the administrative record, the CBSA does not find that there is sufficient evidence to determine that Erdemir is a state‑owned or state‑controlled enterprise. Further, based on the HRC price information on the administrative record, there is no indication that Turkish OCTG producers are benefitting from production inputs that do not reflect market‑based costs. Therefore the CBSA could not conclude that there was sufficient evidence that the presence of SOEs led to the conditions of PMS.

In order to demonstrate whether the costs of inputs that are used in the production of OCTG were otherwise distorted, a detailed price analysis of substantial inputs was conducted. During the POI, the responding exporter in Turkey purchased HRC from suppliers located in Turkey and other countries. The analysis revealed that the input purchase prices were in line for both domestic and exported inputs. Furthermore, monthly purchase prices of the inputs from the participating exporter were compared with published Fastmarkets MB monthly prices of HRC in other regions, including Central Europe. The analysis demonstrated that the monthly prices were either higher or in line with the prices published in Fastmarkets MB.

On June 30, 2021 the Canada Border Services Agency (the "CBSA") issued a Notice of Initiation of Investigation under the Special Import Measures Act ("SIMA") of alleged dumping of Oil Country Tubular Goods ("OCTG") imported from Mexico. This investigation was prompted by a complaint filed by Canadian manufacturers of the products in Saskatchewan and Ontario.

"Oil country tubular goods, which are casing, tubing and green tubes made of carbon or alloy steel, welded or seamless, heat treated or not heat treated, regardless of end finish, having an outside diameter from 2 3/8 inches to 13 3/8 inches (60.3 mm to 339.7 mm), meeting or supplied to meet American Petroleum Institute specification 5CT or equivalent and/or enhanced proprietary standards, in all grades, excluding drill pipe, pup joints, couplings, coupling stock and stainless steel casing, tubing or green tubes containing 10.5 percent or more by weight of chromium, originating in or exported from the United Mexican States" (the "Subject Goods").

This is the third investigation involving OCTG, with previous investigations imposing anti-dumping duties on similar goods imported from China (see OCTG1), Chinese Taipei, India, Indonesia, the Philippines, South Korea, Thailand, Turkey, Ukraine and Vietnam (see OCTG2).

Traditionally, OCTG grades were carbon-manganese steels (up to the 55-ksi strength level) or Mo-containing grades up to 0.4% Mo. In recent years, deep well drilling and reservoirs containing contaminants that cause corrosive attack have created a strong demand for higher strength materials resistant to hydrogen embrittlement and SCC. Highly tempered martensite is the structure most resistant to SSC at higher strength levels, and 0.75% is the Mo concentration that produces the optimum combination of yield strength and to SSC resistance(1).