blowdown ring in safety valve factory

www.controlglobal.com is using a security service for protection against online attacks. An action has triggered the service and blocked your request.

Please try again in a few minutes. If the issue persist, please contact the site owner for further assistance. Reference ID IP Address Date and Time 49aa4de84ffe7587c78dee4984bc4222 63.210.148.230 01/29/2023 09:01 AM UTC

Unless you are dealing with a Power Boiler, chances are you have a one ring design safety-relief valve. bill_bill_2000"s commnets were germain to a two ring design Power Boiler Safety Valve. On compressible fluids, the adjusting ring in a one ring design Safety-Relief Valve, must perform three functions. First it needs to be close enough to the disc to direct flow against the disc & disc holder in order to create a reaction force which combines with the inlet force to overcome spring force and cause the valve to pop open. Second, it must be far enough from the disc to allow fluid an escape path so that the valve does not remain open below normal system operating pressure, typically 10% below set pressure. Long blowdown can cause other problems in the system. Thirdly, the ring provides a cushioning effect as the disc reseats. Acting like a retro-rocket, the reaction forces keep the disc from slamming into the nozzle and damaging the seating surfaces.

Blowdown Ring is a specific Part Nomenclature for Farris because it controls reseat. It is referred to as a Nozzle Ring by Crosby for its location (threaded onto the o.d. of the nozzle. Dresser calls it an Adjusting Ring and Knukle refers to it as a Warn Ring. Warn is an older term for simmer. The PRV simmers just prior to pop, therefore simmer is also called warn. SO, 4 major manufacturers with 4 different trems for the same part. The blowdown ring is an important part of PRV Maintenance and Testing. It is what sets PRV repair apart from other mechanical disciplines. DIsassmbly, inspection, machining, lapping and reassembly are common to all valves, pumps, etc. But Blowdown Ring Adjustment is unique to Pressure Relief Valves. Many PRV manufactuerers give ring setting positions in their maintenance manuals. Liquid Settings are typically set very close to the disc during reassembly and require no further adjustment during testing. However, for air/gas/vapor service, the Manufaturers Settings will usually yield long blowdown, because short blowdown may result in insufficient capacity and in a two ring design in chatter. You do not typically see ring setting induced chatter in a one ring design. Most of the time, chatter is a result of an installation problem, i.e. reduced inlet piping, extremely long inlet piping, excessive pressure drop at the PRV inlet. I hope this is helpful

A spring-loaded relief valve can be thought of as a spring /mass system which is why relief valves chatter. Researchers have found significant differences in the stability of relief valves based on the design of their internals. One recent study found that with 6 feet of inlet piping, valves from Manufacturer X were stable in 50% of the tests while valves from Manufacturer Z where stable in 100% of these tests.¹ Smith & Burgess Laboratory research has confirmed these findings. However, relief systems designers tend to downplay (if not ignore) the importance of the mechanical design of relief valves which is important to stability. Therefore, this article discusses the fundamentals of the design parameters for the internals of a relief valve. The intent is to provide design considerations and general operation information for use by relief systems designers, specifically assisting with the understanding of the effects of valve design on stability.

Modern relief valves are wonderfully modular.The internal parts for a relief valve (valve disc,disc holder, blowdown ringandspring) can be interchanged for ones with a different design to customize valve performance based on the application, fluid service, and set pressure.Valve disccan be metal-to-metal or soft seats. Soft seat designs use an elastomer to create a better seal between thevalvediscand thenozzle. Relief valves with elastomer seats have limitations and can only be used in certain applications.Disc holdersare generally designed to allow thevalve discto float which provides an angular movement that reduces seat leakage from minor misalignments (ensuring that thevalve dischas 360 degrees of contact with thenozzle). Thedisc holderoutside diameter, shape and thickness plays an important role in determining the valve performance by defining the shape of thehuddling chamber. Thehuddling chambercan also be defined by theblowdown ring(s). Thering(s)can also be swapped to different sized and shapedringsto adjust performance based on the expected relief fluid.Springsare selected to keep the valve closed and must fit inside thevalve bonnet. The force thespringexerts is an important design criteria for a relief device and varies depending on the relief fluid, valve size and set pressure.

Spring loaded relief valves are known as "pop action" relief valves as they typically pop open at their set pressure. Initially, the pressure differential across thevalve discthat creates the force to over come the spring force and open the valve.The pop action occurs because mosthuddling chambersare designed with an area that is approximately 10%-30% larger than thevalve seat(as thedisc holderis bigger than thevalve disc). Once the pressure under the seat is enough to lift thevalve discoff thenozzle, there is a step change in the upward forces on thespringand the valve "pops" open. The shape of thehuddling chamber(created by the shape and size of thedisc holder), the position and shape of theblowdown ring, and the characteristics of the fluid being relieved together determine the initial opening force and the initial lift of the valve.

Blowdown ringsare adjustable rings with a design shape that modifies the effluent flow path andhuddling chamberbased on the position. For process valves, a singleblowdown ringis typically threaded onto thenozzleand can be adjusted vertically up or down. Manufacturers will specify a recommended position relative to contact with thevalve disc. The position of theblowdown ringis fixed with a locking screw. The position of theblowdown ringchanges the blowdown (or reseat) pressure. For valves with a singleblowdown ring, the closer theblowdown ringis to thenozzle, the lower the pressure in the system will need to be for the valve to close (more blowdown). Other relief valves have multipleblowdown rings. Each manufacturer designs a uniqueblowdown ringto compliment other aspects of the relief valve design. Smith & Burgess" testing confirms that position and design ofblowdown ring(s)affects valve stability.

Relief Valve manufactures generally select aspringthat is designed for the set pressure of the valve. Thespringthat is selected will have a pressure range that thespringcan be applied. In many cases, there may be more than onespringthat can be used with each relief valve each having a different spring constant. The stifferspringmay have a range that is higher than the softerspringbut still meet the overall requirements for set pressure. The selection of thespringwill affect stability as the specific spring influences the natural frequency of the valve and can also affect the blowdown.

Any pressurised system requires safety devices to protect people, processes and property. This tutorial details situations when overpressure may occur, the wide and often confusing types of device on offer, how such devices operate and the many codes, standards and approval authorities to note.

As soon as mankind was able to boil water to create steam, the necessity of the safety device became evident. As long as 2000 years ago, the Chinese were using cauldrons with hinged lids to allow (relatively) safer production of steam. At the beginning of the 14th century, chemists used conical plugs and later, compressed springs to act as safety devices on pressurised vessels.

Early in the 19th century, boiler explosions on ships and locomotives frequently resulted from faulty safety devices, which led to the development of the first safety relief valves.

In 1848, Charles Retchie invented the accumulation chamber, which increases the compression surface within the safety valve allowing it to open rapidly within a narrow overpressure margin.

Today, most steam users are compelled by local health and safety regulations to ensure that their plant and processes incorporate safety devices and precautions, which ensure that dangerous conditions are prevented.

The principle type of device used to prevent overpressure in plant is the safety or safety relief valve. The safety valve operates by releasing a volume of fluid from within the plant when a predetermined maximum pressure is reached, thereby reducing the excess pressure in a safe manner. As the safety valve may be the only remaining device to prevent catastrophic failure under overpressure conditions, it is important that any such device is capable of operating at all times and under all possible conditions.

Safety valves should be installed wherever the maximum allowable working pressure (MAWP) of a system or pressure-containing vessel is likely to be exceeded. In steam systems, safety valves are typically used for boiler overpressure protection and other applications such as downstream of pressure reducing controls. Although their primary role is for safety, safety valves are also used in process operations to prevent product damage due to excess pressure. Pressure excess can be generated in a number of different situations, including:

The terms ‘safety valve’ and ‘safety relief valve’ are generic terms to describe many varieties of pressure relief devices that are designed to prevent excessive internal fluid pressure build-up. A wide range of different valves is available for many different applications and performance criteria.

In most national standards, specific definitions are given for the terms associated with safety and safety relief valves. There are several notable differences between the terminology used in the USA and Europe. One of the most important differences is that a valve referred to as a ‘safety valve’ in Europe is referred to as a ‘safety relief valve’ or ‘pressure relief valve’ in the USA. In addition, the term ‘safety valve’ in the USA generally refers specifically to the full-lift type of safety valve used in Europe.

• Pressure relief valve -A spring-loaded pressure relief valve which is designed to open to relieve excess pressure and to reclose and prevent the further flow of fluid after normal conditions have been restored. It is characterised by a rapid-opening ‘pop’ action or by opening in a manner generally proportional to the increase in pressure over the opening pressure. It may be used for either compressible or incompressible fluids, depending on design, adjustment, or application.

Safety valves are primarily used with compressible gases and in particular for steam and air services. However, they can also be used for process type applications where they may be needed to protect the plant or to prevent spoilage of the product being processed.

• Relief valve -A pressure relief device actuated by inlet static pressure having a gradual lift generally proportional to the increase in pressure over opening pressure.

Relief valves are commonly used in liquid systems, especially for lower capacities and thermal expansion duty. They can also be used on pumped systems as pressure overspill devices.

• Safety relief valve -A pressure relief valve characterised by rapid opening or pop action, or by opening in proportion to the increase in pressure over the opening pressure, depending on the application, and which may be used either for liquid or compressible fluid.

In general, the safety relief valve will perform as a safety valve when used in a compressible gas system, but it will open in proportion to the overpressure when used in liquid systems, as would a relief valve.

• Safety valve -A valve which automatically, without the assistance of any energy other than that of the fluid concerned, discharges a quantity of the fluid so as to prevent a predetermined safe pressure being exceeded, and which is designed to re-close and prevent further flow of fluid after normal pressure conditions of service have been restored.

The basic spring loaded safety valve, referred to as ‘standard’ or ‘conventional’ is a simple, reliable self-acting device that provides overpressure protection.

The basic elements of the design consist of a right angle pattern valve body with the valve inlet connection, or nozzle, mounted on the pressure-containing system. The outlet connection may be screwed or flanged for connection to a piped discharge system. However, in some applications, such as compressed air systems, the safety valve will not have an outlet connection, and the fluid is vented directly to the atmosphere.

The valve inlet (or approach channel) design can be either a full-nozzle or a semi-nozzle type. A full-nozzle design has the entire ‘wetted’ inlet tract formed from one piece. The approach channel is the only part of the safety valve that is exposed to the process fluid during normal operation, other than the disc, unless the valve is discharging.

Conversely, the semi-nozzle design consists of a seating ring fitted into the body, the top of which forms the seat of the valve. The advantage of this arrangement is that the seat can easily be replaced, without replacing the whole inlet.

The disc is held against the nozzle seat (under normal operating conditions) by the spring, which is housed in an open or closed spring housing arrangement (or bonnet) mounted on top of the body. The discs used in rapid opening (pop type) safety valves are surrounded by a shroud, disc holder or huddling chamber which helps to produce the rapid opening characteristic.

The closing force on the disc is provided by a spring, typically made from carbon steel. The amount of compression on the spring is usually adjustable, using the spring adjuster, to alter the pressure at which the disc is lifted off its seat.Standards that govern the design and use of safety valves generally only define the three dimensions that relate to the discharge capacity of the safety valve, namely the flow (or bore) area, the curtain area and the discharge (or orifice) area.

2. Curtain area -The area of the cylindrical or conical discharge opening between the seating surfaces created by the lift of the disk above the seat.

Valves in which the flow area and not the curtain area determines the capacity are known as full lift valves. These valves will have a greater capacity than low lift or high lift valves.

Although the principal elements of a conventional safety valve are similar, the design details can vary considerably. In general, the DIN style valves (commonly used throughout Europe) tend to use a simpler construction with a fixed skirt (or hood) arrangement whereas the ASME style valves have a more complex design that includes one or two adjustable blowdown rings. The position of these rings can be used to fine-tune the overpressure and blowdown values of the valve.

For a given orifice area, there may be a number of different inlet and outlet connection sizes, as well as body dimensions such as centreline to face dimensions. Furthermore, many competing products, particularly of European origin have differing dimensions and capacities for the same nominal size.

An exception to this situation is found with steel ASME specification valves, which invariably follow the recommendations of the API Recommended Practice 526, where centreline to face dimensions, and orifice sizes are listed. The orifice area series are referred to by a letter. It is common for

For example, 2" x J x 3" and 3" x J x 4" are both valves which have the same size (‘J’) orifice, but they have differing inlet and outlet sizes as shown before and after the orifice letter respectively.

When the inlet static pressure rises above the set pressure of the safety valve, the disc will begin to lift off its seat. However, as soon as the spring starts to compress, the spring force will increase; this means that the pressure would have to continue to rise before any further lift can occur, and for there to be any significant flow through the valve.

The additional pressure rise required before the safety valve will discharge at its rated capacity is called the overpressure. The allowable overpressure depends on the standards being followed and the particular application. For compressible fluids, this is normally between 3% and 10%, and for liquids between 10% and 25%.

In order to achieve full opening from this small overpressure, the disc arrangement has to be specially designed to provide rapid opening. This is usually done by placing a shroud, skirt or hood around the disc. The volume contained within this shroud is known as the control or huddling chamber.

As lift begins, and fluid enters the chamber, a larger area of the shroud is exposed to the fluid pressure. Since the magnitude of the lifting force (F) is proportional to the product of the pressure (P) and the area exposed to the fluid (A); (F = P x A), the opening force is increased.

This incremental increase in opening force overcompensates for the increase in spring force, causing rapid opening. At the same time, the shroud reverses the direction of the flow, which provides a reaction force, further enhancing the lift.

These combined effects allow the valve to achieve its designed lift within a relatively small percentage overpressure. For compressible fluids, an additional contributory factor is the rapid expansion as the fluid volume increases from a higher to a lower pressure area. This plays a major role in ensuring that the valve opens fully within the small overpressure limit. For liquids, this effect is more proportional and subsequently, the overpressure is typically greater; 25% is common.

Once normal operating conditions have been restored, the valve is required to close again, but since the larger area of the disc is still exposed to the fluid, the valve will not close until the pressure has dropped below the original set pressure. The difference between the set pressure and this reseating pressure is known as the ‘blowdown’, and it is usually specified as a percentage of the set pressure. For compressible fluids, the blowdown is usually less than 10%, and for liquids, it can be up to 20%.

The design of the shroud must be such that it offers both rapid opening and relatively small blowdown, so that as soon as a potentially hazardous situation is reached, any overpressure is relieved, but excessive quantities of the fluid are prevented from being discharged. At the same time, it is necessary to ensure that the system pressure is reduced sufficiently to prevent immediate reopening.

The blowdown rings found on most ASME type safety valves are used to make fine adjustments to the overpressure and blowdown values of the valves (see Figure 9.1.8). The lower blowdown (nozzle) ring is a common feature on many valves where the tighter overpressure and blowdown requirements require a more sophisticated designed solution. The upper blowdown ring is usually factory set and essentially takes out the manufacturing tolerances which affect the geometry of the huddling chamber.

The lower blowdown ring is also factory set to achieve the appropriate code performance requirements but under certain circumstances can be altered. When the lower blowdown ring is adjusted to its top position the huddling chamber volume is such that the valve will pop rapidly,

minimising the overpressure value but correspondingly requiring a greater blowdown before the valve re-seats. When the lower blowdown ring is adjusted to its lower position there is minimal restriction in the huddling chamber and a greater overpressure will be required before the valve is fully open but the blowdown value will be reduced.

For most countries, there are independent bodies who will examine the design and performance of a product range to confirm conformity with the relevant code or standard. This system of third party approval is very common for any safety related products and is often a customer requirement before purchase, or a requirement of their insurance company.

The actual requirements for approval will vary depending on the particular code or standard. In some cases, revalidation is necessary every few years, in others approval is indefinite as long as no significant design changes are made, in which case the approval authority must be notified, and re-approval sought. In the USA, the National Board of Boiler and Pressure Vessel Inspectors represents the US and Canadian government agencies empowered to assure adherence to code construction and repair of boilers and pressure vessels.

Standards relevant to safety valves vary quite considerably in format around the world, and many are sections within codes relevant to Boilers or Pressure Containing Vessels. Some will only outline performance requirements, tolerances and essential constructional detail, but give no guidance on dimensions, orifice sizes etc. Others will be related to installation and application.

For steam boiler applications there are very specific requirements for safety valve performance, demanded by national standards and often, insurance companies. Approval by an independent authority is often necessary, such as British Engine, TÜV or Lloyd’s Register.

Safety valves used in Europe are also subject to the standards associated with the Pressure Equipment Directive (PED). Being classified as ‘Safety accessories’, safety valves are considered as ‘Category 4’ equipment, which require the most demanding level of assessment within the PED regime. This can usually be met by the manufacturer having an ISO 9000 quality system and the safety valve design and performance certified by an officially recognised approval authority referred to as a ‘Notified Body’.

A fire-tube boiler can be fitted with one or more safety valves on the top of its shell, with each set to open when the boiler reaches its design pressure. Noisolation valvesor restrictions should be integrated between the safety valve(s) and boiler. If the valves are not installed directly onto the boiler shell, the pipework connecting the valves to the boiler must be kept clear of blockagesand water, and this must be confirmed by periodic testing.

Once a safety valve opens, steam is discharged via the exhaust pipe. Exhaust pipes must be designed to encounter as few bends as possible, be as short as possible, to have no reduction in pipe section (no internal pipe diameter reduction), and should lead to asafe point of discharge(typically outside the boiler house).

Water must be drained from the safety valve or exhaust pipework via a drainpipe. Drainpipes may be connected to holes drilled into the lowest section of the exhaust pipework, or, directly to drain holes in the safety valve body; these drains are not to be confused with the blowdown ring locking bolt, if one is fitted.

Where two safety valves are fitted, it is common that one is set just belowthe boiler’s design pressure. It is vital that each safety valve permits the full flow of steam produced when the boiler is operating at maximum capacity i.e. when the boiler is producing the maximum amount of steam it can possibly produce. If safety valves are sized correctly, a boiler can be firing at full capacity without the steam pressure exceeding design limits (because the safety valve(s) relieves pressure at a faster rate than it is accumulated).

There are various types of safety valve, including high lift and improved high lift valves, which use the force of escaping steam to open a winged valve plug to achieve greater steam flow rates. In addition to this, some valves integrate a pistonat the bottom of the spring chamber. The piston has a larger surface area than the valve plug, which leads to the valve opening with a definitive ‘pop’ sound.

Some boiler safety valves include a blowdown ring. The blowdown ring can raise or lower the valve seat ring and is used to control the amount of blowdown through the valve. This ring is locked by a bolt that protrudes through the valve and into the adjusting ring segments.

Boiler safety valves should be fitted with an easing gear (looks like a handle), used, when necessary, to rapidly release boiler pressure. Easing gears can also be used for testing a safety valve, ensuring the spindle has freedom of movement and that the valve operating mechanism functions as intended. Easing gear testing is often not conducted due to operators having difficulty with the valves resealing, but this is generally only the case with valves that are not tested often enough. Actuating the easing gear several times is often all it takes to dislodge debris from the sealing area and allow the valve to seal again. For safe operation, the easing gear handle is usually connected via steel cables to an area neighbouring the boiler.

Like pressure gauges, all safety valves should be stripped, inspected, and calibrated, at least once a year; maintenance usually occurs during statutory inspections. Calibration of each valve should be conducted by a competent person, and any valve adjustment (including the blowdown ring) should be approved and sealed by the authorised inspector. After testing and calibration, all valves should be correctly marked, suitable certificates issued, and accurate records maintained.

An accumulation test can be conducted to ensure a safety valve can relieve over-pressure steam when the boiler burner is operating at maximum capacity. Accumulation testing of safety valves must be repeated after any alterations are made to the boiler e.g. replacement of a safety valve, fuel change, or changes to the control system. If, during an accumulation test, boiler pressure rises by more than 10% of its design pressure, the test must be aborted. Before the boiler is re-tested, amendments must be made to either the safety valve relieving capacity, thesafety valve exhaust pipework, or the boiler’s steaming capacity, to ensure the 10% limit is never exceeded.

Reliefand safetyvalves prevent equipment damage by relieving over-pressurisation of fluid systems. The main difference between a relief valve and a safety valve is the extent of opening at the set-point pressure.

A relief valve gradually opens as the inlet pressure increases above the set-point. A relief valve opens only as necessary to relieve the over-pressure condition. Relief valves are typically used for liquid systems.

A safety valve rapidly‘pops’ fully openas soon as the pressure setting is reached and will stay fully open until the pressure drops below the reset pressure. The reset pressure is lower than the actuating set-point pressure. The difference between the actuating pressure set-point, and the pressure at which the safety valve resets, is called blowdown. Safety valves are typically used for gas or vapour systems.

A safety relief valve may open fully, or proportionally, once the pressure setting is reached. SRVs may be used for any fluid system (gas, liquid, or vapour).

In 1986, the NRC issued the Information Notice (IN) 86-05 "Main Steam Safety Valve test failures and ring setting adjustments". Shortly after this IN was issued, the Code was revised to require that a full flow test has to be performed on each CL.2 MSSV by the manufacturer to verify that the valve was adjusted so that it would reach full lift and thus full relieving capacity and would re-close at a pressure as specified in the valve Design Specification. In response to the concern discussed in the IN, the Westinghouse Owners Group (WOG) performed extensive full flow testing onmore »PWR MSSVs and found that each valve required a unique setting of a combination of two rings in order to achieve full lift at accumulation of 3% and re-closing at a blowdown of 5%. The Bopp and Reuther MSSV type SiZ 2507 has a "fixed blowdown" i.e. without any adjusting rings to adjust the "blowdown" so that the blowdown is "fixed". More than 1000 pieces of this type are successfully in nuclear power plants in operation. Many of them since about 25 years. Therefore it can be considered as a proven design. It is new that an optimization of this MSSV type SiZ 2507 fulfill the requirements of part NC-7512 of the ASME Section III although there are still no adjusting rings in the flow part. In 2000, for the Qinshan Candu unit 1 and 2 full flow tests were performed with 32 MSSV type SiZ 2507 size 8"" x 12"" at 51 bar saturated steam in only 6 days. In all tests the functional performance was very stable. It was demonstrated by recording the signals lift and system pressure that all valves had acceptable results to achieve full lift at accumulation of 3% and to re-close at blowdown of 5%. This is an advantage which gives a reduction in cost for flow tests and which gives more reliability after maintenance work during outage compared to the common MSSV design with an individual required setting of the combination of the two rings. The design of the type SiZ 2507 without any adjusting rings in the flow path is presented. The stable performance depends on the interaction of flow force and spring force. The optimization of the flow path to create a suitable flow-force-curve was managed by Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) and flow-force-characteristic-measurements at a model 1: 2.5. The method of the flow-force-characteristic-measurement permits systematic dimensioning of valve spring forces by means of measurement of the fluid mechanical forces occurring on the valve spindle during flow. A special procedure was established to verify a spring force versus lift curve with an accuracy of 1% for each production valve. This gives high reliability at required stable performance and this can not be influenced by wrong setting of any adjusting ring during maintenance work. (authors)« less

A rope appx. 6-7 meters with a hook one end should be attached to the valve lifting lever before starting the pressure rise. It will help in operating the lever to avoid chattering & over pressure

Safety valves blow down should be set more than required, as blow down percentage decreases as the steam temperature increases. An approximate rule is to add 0.5% of set pressure to the blow down for each 56.5 °C rise in SH steam temperature.

If a Super heater safety valve lifts at 189.5 kg/cm2 & reseats at 180 kg/cm2 at the temperature of 400 deg c, then calculate the blowdown calculation at 540 deg c

The National Board strives to keep information in the hands of website users. Provided here are more than 70 Technical Articles previously published in the National Board BULLETINand/or from the proceedings of past General Meetings.