boiler safety valve setting formula made in china

As soon as mankind was able to boil water to create steam, the necessity of the safety device became evident. As long as 2000 years ago, the Chinese were using cauldrons with hinged lids to allow (relatively) safer production of steam. At the beginning of the 14th century, chemists used conical plugs and later, compressed springs to act as safety devices on pressurised vessels.

Early in the 19th century, boiler explosions on ships and locomotives frequently resulted from faulty safety devices, which led to the development of the first safety relief valves.

In 1848, Charles Retchie invented the accumulation chamber, which increases the compression surface within the safety valve allowing it to open rapidly within a narrow overpressure margin.

Today, most steam users are compelled by local health and safety regulations to ensure that their plant and processes incorporate safety devices and precautions, which ensure that dangerous conditions are prevented.

The principle type of device used to prevent overpressure in plant is the safety or safety relief valve. The safety valve operates by releasing a volume of fluid from within the plant when a predetermined maximum pressure is reached, thereby reducing the excess pressure in a safe manner. As the safety valve may be the only remaining device to prevent catastrophic failure under overpressure conditions, it is important that any such device is capable of operating at all times and under all possible conditions.

Safety valves should be installed wherever the maximum allowable working pressure (MAWP) of a system or pressure-containing vessel is likely to be exceeded. In steam systems, safety valves are typically used for boiler overpressure protection and other applications such as downstream of pressure reducing controls. Although their primary role is for safety, safety valves are also used in process operations to prevent product damage due to excess pressure. Pressure excess can be generated in a number of different situations, including:

The terms ‘safety valve’ and ‘safety relief valve’ are generic terms to describe many varieties of pressure relief devices that are designed to prevent excessive internal fluid pressure build-up. A wide range of different valves is available for many different applications and performance criteria.

In most national standards, specific definitions are given for the terms associated with safety and safety relief valves. There are several notable differences between the terminology used in the USA and Europe. One of the most important differences is that a valve referred to as a ‘safety valve’ in Europe is referred to as a ‘safety relief valve’ or ‘pressure relief valve’ in the USA. In addition, the term ‘safety valve’ in the USA generally refers specifically to the full-lift type of safety valve used in Europe.

Pressure relief valve- A spring-loaded pressure relief valve which is designed to open to relieve excess pressure and to reclose and prevent the further flow of fluid after normal conditions have been restored. It is characterised by a rapid-opening ‘pop’ action or by opening in a manner generally proportional to the increase in pressure over the opening pressure. It may be used for either compressible or incompressible fluids, depending on design, adjustment, or application.

Safety valves are primarily used with compressible gases and in particular for steam and air services. However, they can also be used for process type applications where they may be needed to protect the plant or to prevent spoilage of the product being processed.

Relief valve - A pressure relief device actuated by inlet static pressure having a gradual lift generally proportional to the increase in pressure over opening pressure.

Relief valves are commonly used in liquid systems, especially for lower capacities and thermal expansion duty. They can also be used on pumped systems as pressure overspill devices.

Safety relief valve - A pressure relief valve characterised by rapid opening or pop action, or by opening in proportion to the increase in pressure over the opening pressure, depending on the application, and which may be used either for liquid or compressible fluid.

In general, the safety relief valve will perform as a safety valve when used in a compressible gas system, but it will open in proportion to the overpressure when used in liquid systems, as would a relief valve.

Safety valve- A valve which automatically, without the assistance of any energy other than that of the fluid concerned, discharges a quantity of the fluid so as to prevent a predetermined safe pressure being exceeded, and which is designed to re-close and prevent further flow of fluid after normal pressure conditions of service have been restored.

Boiler explosions have been responsible for widespread damage to companies throughout the years, and that’s why today’s boilers are equipped with safety valves and/or relief valves. Boiler safety valves are designed to prevent excess pressure, which is usually responsible for those devastating explosions. That said, to ensure that boiler safety valves are working properly and providing adequate protection, they must meet regulatory specifications and require ongoing maintenance and periodic testing. Without these precautions, malfunctioning safety valves may fail, resulting in potentially disastrous consequences.

Boiler safety valves are activated by upstream pressure. If the pressure exceeds a defined threshold, the valve activates and automatically releases pressure. Typically used for gas or vapor service, boiler safety valves pop fully open once a pressure threshold is reached and remain open until the boiler pressure reaches a pre-defined, safe lower pressure.

Boiler relief valves serve the same purpose – automatically lowering boiler pressure – but they function a bit differently than safety valves. A relief valve doesn’t open fully when pressure exceeds a defined threshold; instead, it opens gradually when the pressure threshold is exceeded and closes gradually until the lower, safe threshold is reached. Boiler relief valves are typically used for liquid service.

There are also devices known as “safety relief valves” which have the characteristics of both types discussed above. Safety relief valves can be used for either liquid or gas or vapor service.

Nameplates must be fastened securely and permanently to the safety valve and remain readable throughout the lifespan of the valve, so durability is key.

The National Board of Boiler and Pressure Vessel Inspectors offers guidance and recommendations on boiler and pressure vessel safety rules and regulations. However, most individual states set forth their own rules and regulations, and while they may be similar across states, it’s important to ensure that your boiler safety valves meet all state and local regulatory requirements.

The National Board published NB-131, Recommended Boiler and Pressure Vessel Safety Legislation, and NB-132, Recommended Administrative Boiler and Pressure Vessel Safety Rules and Regulationsin order to provide guidance and encourage the development of crucial safety laws in jurisdictions that currently have no laws in place for the “proper construction, installation, inspection, operation, maintenance, alterations, and repairs” necessary to protect workers and the public from dangerous boiler and pressure vessel explosions that may occur without these safeguards in place.

The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) governs the code that establishes guidelines and requirements for safety valves. Note that it’s up to plant personnel to familiarize themselves with the requirements and understand which parts of the code apply to specific parts of the plant’s steam systems.

High steam capacity requirements, physical or economic constraints may make the use of a single safety valve impossible. In these cases, using multiple safety valves on the same system is considered an acceptable practice, provided that proper sizing and installation requirements are met – including an appropriately sized vent pipe that accounts for the total steam venting capacity of all valves when open at the same time.

The lowest rating (MAWP or maximum allowable working pressure) should always be used among all safety devices within a system, including boilers, pressure vessels, and equipment piping systems, to determine the safety valve set pressure.

Avoid isolating safety valves from the system, such as by installing intervening shut-off valves located between the steam component or system and the inlet.

Contact the valve supplier immediately for any safety valve with a broken wire seal, as this indicates that the valve is unsafe for use. Safety valves are sealed and certified in order to prevent tampering that can prevent proper function.

Avoid attaching vent discharge piping directly to a safety valve, which may place unnecessary weight and additional stress on the valve, altering the set pressure.

**Update to this article, June 7, 2022 : If you found this article helpful, here is a link to another article I recently found that does a nice job explaining the topic: ENGINEERS BEWARE: API vs ASME Relief Valve Orifice Size – Petro Chem Engineering (petrochemengg.com)

If you"ve ever sized/selected a Pressure Safety-Relief Valve (PSV) using vendor sizing programs or good-old hand calculations, you"ve probably run into a very strange anomaly: Why does a PSV orifice size change between American Petroleum Institute (API) and American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) data sets? What is an "effective" orifice area? How do I know which standard to use when selecting a PSV?

Usually, this issue is one of curiosity and doesn"t affect the end result of what valve is chosen. Common practice is to default to API sizing equations and parameters, and only use ASME data sets for situations outside of the API letter-designations. But what if I told you that approach is likely causing you to oversize about 10% of your PSVs and their respective piping systems?

Too often, we leave that third part out of the process, and simply calculate relief loads and select valves using API techniques, without ever checking our selection against certified ASME data. Proper application of these standards is the first key point of this article:

Initial sizing and valve selection is done using API equations, and final valve selection and certification is done using ASME-certified coefficients and capacities.

The BPVC is an enormous code, and not reviewed in detail here. On the subject of PSVs, it basically says that a PSV must be capable of relieving the required load, and it must be tested in a specific manner to be certified to do so. If a valve is tested per the specific directions in the BPVC, it will be ASME certified and receive an ASME UV stamp.

The first thing API does is attempt to standardize physical PSV sizes and design, and it does so in API RP 526, which is targeted at PSV manufacturers. API provides pre-defined valve sizes, with letter designations D through T (API 526). It also defines other details directed toward valve manufacturers (such as temperature ratings). All of this is intended as minimum design standards, and manufacturers are free to exceed these parameters as they wish.

The second thing API does is provide standardized equations and parameters to use when trying to figure out just what size of a PSV one needs for a particular scenario. The equations account for design parameters that ASME doesn"t speak to, such as specific fluid properties, backpressures, critical flow, two-phase flow, and many other aspects of fluid dynamics that will affect the ability of a particular valve to relieve a required load.

API sizing equations are by nature theoretical, standardized, and use default or "dummy" values for several sizing parameters that may or may not reflect the actual values for any specific valve.

API RP 520 very clearly talks about this, and emphasizes that the intended use of its equations is to determine a preliminary valve size, which should be verified with actual data. API intends PSV sizing to be a two-step process, but we are often unaware of this because we (gasp) don’t read the full standard, and/or rely solely on vendor sizing software that hides the iteration from us. See API 520, part 1, section 5.2 for further explanation.

When valves are built, they are built to the API RP 526 standard, however, as one might imagine, when valves are actually tested and certified, the results don’t match up identically to the theoretical values that were calculated. This is where API and ASME intersect; we switch from calculations (API) which were used as a basis to design the valve, to actual empirical data (ASME) to certify the valve. When a valve manufacturer gets the UV code stamp that certifies the valve orifice size and capacity, it is based on actual test results, not API sizing standards. And ASME (which came first) does not have tiered letter designations. The typical D, E, F, etc. sizes we refer to are strictly an API tool, and ASME’s capacity certifications are completely independent of them!

3. A third-party Engineer (you), trying to select a PSV, runs a sizing calculation using API 520 equations on ABC Valve Company"s sizing software, gets a result that requires 4.66in2 to relieve the load, and is now thoroughly confused on what size valve to select.

If one selects the API data set on the sizing software in this example, it will automatically eliminate N-orifice valves as an option, and bump the user up to a P-orifice. However, if one simply selects the ASME data set, the N-orifice valve magically reappears as an option. How can this be? Will the N-orifice work or not?

Digest that for a moment. If you’ve sized and purchased more than a dozen PSVs, chances are you have inadvertently selected a PSV a full size larger than you needed to, in a situation much like our example, simply because you chose a PSV based on its API “rating” rather than its real, certified, stamped ASME rating. If that was a small valve, impact was probably nil. But what if this happened on a valve that resulted in selecting a 8x10 PSV when you could have used a 6x8?

If you’re like me, that answer isn’t very satisfying. Why on earth is this so confusing? How can you simply hit a button on the sizing program and a different size of valve is suddenly acceptable? The key lies how the main coefficient of discharge, Kd, is handled, and how capacities are determined.

There are several K values used in API calculations, all of which have generic values defined in API 520 that can be used for preliminary sizing. These are the numbers used in initial sizing calculations to get us close, then (if we do this correctly) replaced with the actual/tested/empirical/ASME values when we get a certified valve. Remember, anytime you hear “certified” or “stamped”, think ASME.

Let’s take the numbers from the example above, which came from an attempt to size a valve for liquid relief. API says to use a value of Kd=0.65 for liquid relief. If one uses the API data set on the vendor software, then the calculation stops here, and you get a required area of 4.66in2. When you select a valve, you’re comparing that to the API effective (actual) area of an N orifice, which is 4.34 in2, which is obviously too small and you’d logically step up to a P orifice. However….

Remember that the API N-orifice area is just the benchmark, a minimum requirement, and may or may not (most likely not) reflect the actual area of a real-life PSV. Once a valve is selected, all of those K values and capacities should be replaced with actual ASME-certified K values, also determined by testing, that are specific to each valve model, and the calculations performed again.

Normally, ASME-certified K-values are smaller than the API dummy values, driving up the required orifice area. So valve manufacturers have to over-design their valves to make up for it, resulting in ASME-certified areas and capacities that typically exceed the benchmark API ones. The end result of all this?

It (almost) all boils down to one sneaky little sentence in the ASME BPVC which mandates a 10% safety factor on the empirically-determined Kd that “de-rates” the valve (see ASME BPVC Section VIII, UG-131.e.2). This tidbit seems to be a little-known fact that is key to proper PSV sizing and selection, because as engineers we often pile safety factors upon each other and oversize our equipment. I cannot highlight this enough:

I mentioned above that ASME K values are nearly always lower than API values, due to this 10% de-rating. The PSV in our example scenario has a determined Kd of 0.73, which is adjusted down by 10% for a final AMSE Kd of 0.66, slightly higher than the dummy API value (that just means that this particular valve proved it could do about 11% better than the minimum theoretical flow calculated by API when it was tested). So, for our valve in question, the Required ASME area is slightly less than the API area. This is atypical, but not unheard of, and again points to the importance of checking the ASME ratings of any valve you select, and comparing against the API benchmarks.

When you choose to use the ASME data on a specific valve, it’s not just the Kd sizing factor that changes; the actual orifice area and therefore the capacity of the valve also adjusts to empirical, certified values. You can generally expect both values to increase over the API values.

Why is this? Simply that any given real-world valve is usually over-designed so that it will meet and exceed the required minimum capacity of its corresponding API size. What a simple concept, but so often overlooked by engineers!

*Note: this is data from a real case; the specific PSV make/model is omitted. Did you catch the result? The actual, certified capacity of this valve is nearly 13% higher than the generic N-orifice valve, and that includes its 10% safety factor!

With this adjusted orifice area, we can compare to the ASME certified area (which is always going to be larger than the API area), and we have our final answer for the valve size. Often this will not result in a different choice of valve, but sometimes, as in the example case, it will allow us to use a valve with an API letter designation that did not appear large enough based on its API effective area. This can save time and money for our plants by preventing over-sizing valves, leading to smaller piping systems to support them. And remember, the ASME values are empirical and have a 10% safety factor built in, so we don’t need to worry about cutting the design too close; the conservatism is already built in to the method. We can choose the Brand X N-orifice valve and sleep well at night!

Avoid simply defaulting to the API data set for the final “rating” or data sheet when selecting a PSV. Use API sizing calculations as they are intended: for preliminary valve selection. Then switch to the ASME data set. This will often (but not always, remember, it"s valve-specific) result in two differences:

Technical problem to be solved in the utility model is, for the shortcoming of above prior art, propose a kind of pressure relief device for boiler heating tank, not only structure is simple, cost is low, the problem that can avoid resonates pipes, simultaneously can also saving heat energy, reduces costs, and avoid arranged at safety valve in the condition of high temperature, its service life can be increased, the dirt of heating tank inside can also be discharged simultaneously, improve the quality of equipment.

In order to solve the problems of the technologies described above, the technical solution of the utility model is achieved in the following ways: a kind of pressure relief device for boiler heating tank, comprise heating tank, high pressure valve, magnetic valve, downcomer and transformer, heating tank bottom discharge mouth is connected with high pressure valve water inlet by pipeline, the delivery port of high pressure valve is connected with magnetic valve water inlet by pipeline, magnetic valve delivery port is connected with downcomer, magnetic valve and high pressure valve are by wire and transformer control connection, high pressure valve valve is in normally open, magnetic valve valve is in normally off, and be provided with microswitch in high pressure valve and be connected with solenoid valve control circuit, high pressure valve and magnetic valve and transformer is made to form a normal open circuit.

Like this, pass through the technical solution of the utility model, high pressure valve and magnetic valve are arranged on the discharge outlet place of heating tank lower end, by the impact of gravity in heating process, high-temperature water is in upper end, low-temp water level is in lower end, when internal pressure is excessive, the water at low temperature of lower end discharges heating tank, such saving heat energy, avoid waste, reduce costs, the efficiency of heating surface is high, and the dirt of bottom can also be discharged from discharge outlet, increase water quality, and avoid high pressure valve to be in high-temperature high-pressure state for a long time, can increase its service life like this, reduce costs, and avoid high pressure valve to send the sound resonating and pipe.

The aforesaid pressure relief device for boiler heating tank, heating tank upper end is also provided with water inlet pipe, and water inlet pipe is also provided with filter, by filter energy filtering water, avoids blocking.

The aforesaid pressure relief device for boiler heating tank, heating tank is positioned at medium position and is also provided with at least one tap.

The aforesaid pressure relief device for boiler heating tank, between high pressure valve and magnetic valve, pipeline is also provided with pressure transmitter.

The beneficial effects of the utility model are: discharge outlet place high pressure valve and magnetic valve being arranged on heating tank lower end, by the impact of gravity in heating process, high-temperature water is in upper end, low-temp water level is in lower end, when internal pressure is excessive, the water at low temperature of lower end discharges heating tank, such saving heat energy, avoid waste, reduce costs, the efficiency of heating surface is high, and the dirt of bottom can also be discharged from discharge outlet, increase water quality, and avoid high pressure valve to be in high-temperature high-pressure state for a long time, can increase its service life like this, reduce costs, and avoid high pressure valve to send the sound resonating and pipe, water inlet pipe is also provided with filter, by filter energy filtering water, avoids blocking.

A fire-tube boiler can be fitted with one or more safety valves on the top of its shell, with each set to open when the boiler reaches its design pressure. Noisolation valvesor restrictions should be integrated between the safety valve(s) and boiler. If the valves are not installed directly onto the boiler shell, the pipework connecting the valves to the boiler must be kept clear of blockagesand water, and this must be confirmed by periodic testing.

Once a safety valve opens, steam is discharged via the exhaust pipe. Exhaust pipes must be designed to encounter as few bends as possible, be as short as possible, to have no reduction in pipe section (no internal pipe diameter reduction), and should lead to asafe point of discharge(typically outside the boiler house).

Water must be drained from the safety valve or exhaust pipework via a drainpipe. Drainpipes may be connected to holes drilled into the lowest section of the exhaust pipework, or, directly to drain holes in the safety valve body; these drains are not to be confused with the blowdown ring locking bolt, if one is fitted.

Where two safety valves are fitted, it is common that one is set just belowthe boiler’s design pressure. It is vital that each safety valve permits the full flow of steam produced when the boiler is operating at maximum capacity i.e. when the boiler is producing the maximum amount of steam it can possibly produce. If safety valves are sized correctly, a boiler can be firing at full capacity without the steam pressure exceeding design limits (because the safety valve(s) relieves pressure at a faster rate than it is accumulated).

There are various types of safety valve, including high lift and improved high lift valves, which use the force of escaping steam to open a winged valve plug to achieve greater steam flow rates. In addition to this, some valves integrate a pistonat the bottom of the spring chamber. The piston has a larger surface area than the valve plug, which leads to the valve opening with a definitive ‘pop’ sound.

Some boiler safety valves include a blowdown ring. The blowdown ring can raise or lower the valve seat ring and is used to control the amount of blowdown through the valve. This ring is locked by a bolt that protrudes through the valve and into the adjusting ring segments.

Boiler safety valves should be fitted with an easing gear (looks like a handle), used, when necessary, to rapidly release boiler pressure. Easing gears can also be used for testing a safety valve, ensuring the spindle has freedom of movement and that the valve operating mechanism functions as intended. Easing gear testing is often not conducted due to operators having difficulty with the valves resealing, but this is generally only the case with valves that are not tested often enough. Actuating the easing gear several times is often all it takes to dislodge debris from the sealing area and allow the valve to seal again. For safe operation, the easing gear handle is usually connected via steel cables to an area neighbouring the boiler.

Like pressure gauges, all safety valves should be stripped, inspected, and calibrated, at least once a year; maintenance usually occurs during statutory inspections. Calibration of each valve should be conducted by a competent person, and any valve adjustment (including the blowdown ring) should be approved and sealed by the authorised inspector. After testing and calibration, all valves should be correctly marked, suitable certificates issued, and accurate records maintained.

An accumulation test can be conducted to ensure a safety valve can relieve over-pressure steam when the boiler burner is operating at maximum capacity. Accumulation testing of safety valves must be repeated after any alterations are made to the boiler e.g. replacement of a safety valve, fuel change, or changes to the control system. If, during an accumulation test, boiler pressure rises by more than 10% of its design pressure, the test must be aborted. Before the boiler is re-tested, amendments must be made to either the safety valve relieving capacity, thesafety valve exhaust pipework, or the boiler’s steaming capacity, to ensure the 10% limit is never exceeded.

Reliefand safetyvalves prevent equipment damage by relieving over-pressurisation of fluid systems. The main difference between a relief valve and a safety valve is the extent of opening at the set-point pressure.

A relief valve gradually opens as the inlet pressure increases above the set-point. A relief valve opens only as necessary to relieve the over-pressure condition. Relief valves are typically used for liquid systems.

A safety valve rapidly‘pops’ fully openas soon as the pressure setting is reached and will stay fully open until the pressure drops below the reset pressure. The reset pressure is lower than the actuating set-point pressure. The difference between the actuating pressure set-point, and the pressure at which the safety valve resets, is called blowdown. Safety valves are typically used for gas or vapour systems.

A safety relief valve may open fully, or proportionally, once the pressure setting is reached. SRVs may be used for any fluid system (gas, liquid, or vapour).