lime mud pump pricelist

The dominant construction-related use of lime is soil stabilization for roads, building foundations, and earthen dams. In addition, lime pumping applications can also apply to wastewater treatment. Lime is added to low-quality soils to produce a usable base and sub-base. Hydrated lime has long been acknowledged to be a superior anti-stripping additive for asphalt pavements. It also helps resist rutting and fracture growth at low temperatures, reduce age hardening, and improve the moisture resistance and durability. A recent study shows lime holds significant advantages over other additives for hot mix asphalt roads, including long-term cost savings and increased durability. Perhaps the oldest and most traditional use of lime has been in mortar and plaster, because of its superior plasticity and workability.

In regards to wastewater treatment, lime can be used as a far less expensive treating agent. This is because lime has the abilities to increase the alkaline content in water along with controlling bacteria growth commonly found in storage and aeration tanks. This lime slurry process also aids in the removal of manganese, fluoride, tannin, and iron from wastewater systems.

Lime chemical provides an economical solution for removing impurities in clean water, wastewater and sewage treatment processes. Also helps regulate pH control of acidic wastewater.

Paper/pulp production uses lime for both the production of sodium hydroxide and as part of the bleaching process and neutralization of acid wastewater.

Adding lime with water, as a slurry, allows the solution to be pumped considerable distances, making transporting the material easier than mechanically loading into trucks. As you can imagine, the lime slurry is not only corrosive but abrasive as well, which can pose challenges for all types of pumps. Due to these challenges, pump manufacturers are constantly coming up with new designs for reducing the detrimental effects that lime slurry can have on their equipment and production rates. Some of these design ideas are featured on multiple types of pumps including slurry pumps, centrifugal pumps, and peristaltic pumps. Typically, the answer to effectively pumping lime is to keep the fluid moving constantly to maintain the chemical in suspension. With lime slurry, it is important to constantly be reaching a critical line velocity in which there is enough flow and turbulence to prevent sediment from building up in dead spots or crevices found throughout the system. It goes without saying that cleaning limescale in pipes can be very labor intensive, expensive, and particularly in metal pipes. Ideally, the pipeline should be as smooth as possible with an open flow path, making sure the flow rate is directly proportional to maintaining momentum. This is why the EDDY Pump’s turbulent flow design is perfect for keeping the slurry agitated enough to not accumulate on the sides of the pipelines.

During the transportation of lime slurry, there can also be damage to the pipeline transporting lime slurries due to limescale buildup and abrasion at sharp elbows and bends. As a result, radius piping with long bends should be used to help counter this problem. In extreme cases, lime batch tanks can leak or rupture due to excessive pressure build-up. Operators now typically install pressure relief valves as a preventive measure. Another issue with storing lime slurry is the abrasive nature it exhibits in holding and mixing tanks. Most cases of abrasion damage to storage and mixing tanks problems stem from operators using FRP tanks for slurry preparation. However, corrosion resistant metal tanks should be used instead, greatly increasing the lifespan of the tanks.

Scaling in lime slurry piping is another problem caused by the escape of air into pipes (formation of calcium carbonate) and settling of solids during off cycles especially when smaller diameter slurry lines are used. Needless to say cleaning scale in pipes can be very labor intensive particularly in metal pipes. This problem can be minimized by recirculating the lime slurry through a “recirculation loop”, using flexible hoses for slurry transport inlet lines, minimizing the number of sharp bends using piping at least one and half to two inches in diameter and periodically flushing the lines with water. Keep in mind that even using larger diameter lines to lower pressure drop will not eliminate settling of the solids or reduction of flow so the easiest way to design a pipeline is to maintain non-settling conditions, similar to the design of dilute-phase pneumatic conveyors.

Lime is harmful when in contact with skin and eyes, making it very important to ensure the fluid is fully contained and not able to be splashed around. Lime chemical is strongly alkaline and very abrasive as the powder chemical format is insoluble in water and the particles will have a wearing effect on moving parts where there are constant friction and velocity. The EDDY Pump is a unique pump that outperforms other pumps when it comes to pumping abrasive and high viscosity lime slurries.

If you are supplying pump supplies, you can find the most favorable prices at Alibaba.com. Whether you will be working with piston type or diaphragm type systems, reciprocating or centrifugal, Alibaba.com has everything you need. You can also shop for different sizes mud pump wholesale for your metering applications. If you operate a construction site, then you could need to find some concrete pump solutions that you can find at affordable rates at Alibaba.com. Visit the platform and browse through the collection of submersible and inline pump system, among other replaceable models.

A mud pump comes in different makes and sizes, and you buy the tool depending on the application. The pump used by a filling station is not the one you use to fill up your tanks. There are high flow rate low pressure systems used to transfer fluids axially. On the other hand, you can go with radial ones dealing with a low flow rate and high-pressure fluid. The mixed flow pump variety combines radial and axial transfer mechanisms and works with medium flow and pressure fluids. Depending on what it will be pumping, you can then choose the mud pump of choice from the collection at Alibaba.com.

Alibaba.com has been an excellent wholesale supplier of mud pump for years. The supply consists of a vast number of brands to choose from, comes in different sizes, operations, and power sources. You can get a pump for residential and large commercial applications from the collection. Whether you want a water pump for your home, or run a repair and maintenance business, and need a supply ofud pump, you can find the product you want from the vast collection at Alibaba.com.therther is refrigeration, air conditioning, transfer, or a simple car wash business, anything you want, Alibative.com can it you.

Explore a wide variety of pump mud vacuum on Alibaba.com and enjoy exquisite deals. The machines help maintain drilling mud circulation throughout the project. There are many models and brands available, each with outstanding value. These pump mud vacuum are efficient, durable, and completely waterproof. They are designed to lift water and mud with efficiency without using much energy or taking a lot of space.

The primary advantage of these pump mud vacuum is that they can raise water from greater depths. With the fast-changing technology, purchase machines that come with the best technology for optimum results. They should be well adapted to the overall configuration of the installation to perform various operations. Hence, quality products are needed for more efficiency and enjoyment of the machines" full life expectancy.

Alibaba.com offers a wide selection of products with innovative features. The products are designed for a wide range of flow rates that differ by brand. They provide cost-effective options catering to different consumer needs. When choosing the right pump mud vacuum for the drilling project, consider factors such as size, shape, and machine cost. More powerful tools are needed when dealing with large projects such as agriculture or irrigation.

Alibaba.com provides a wide range of pump mud vacuum to suit different tastes and budgets. The site has a large assortment of products from major suppliers on the market. The products are made of durable materials to avoid corrosion and premature wear during operations. The range of products and brands on the site assures quality and good value for money.

STT offers slakers, silos, silo roofs, scrubbers, betting bowls, bin vents, screw conveyors, pumps, mixers, and feeders. Manufacture fully automated slakers to replace manually controlled equipment, providing real-time monitoring and of your slaking process, chemical system retrofit for dust and moisture control and reduction of clogs, modified feed retrofit to improve slaking reaction and drive efficient lime usage, and mixer and tank baffle redesign to reduce solids build-up at the bottom of slurry tank.

The Liberty Process LL8 Progressive Cavity Pump is ideal for abrasive pumping applications such as drilling fluids with sand and grit common in fracking operations. As a Mud Pump, the LL8 Series is a popular model on many mobile pumping rigs in use today. Replacement mud pump parts are available as well from our stock and work on other popular manufacturers models.

The Liberty LL8 is a standard flanged pump design manufactured with cast iron or 316 stainless steel pump casings designed in 1, 2, and 3 stages for 75, 150 and 225 psi discharge pressures and a flow rate of 18 up to 100 GPM.

The LL8 is a modular design with simple hardened pinned joint drive assembly. LL8 Rotors are typically hardened tool steel or 316 stainless steel with a hard chrome plating for long life in abrasive pumping applications.

All other wetted parts are either carbon steel or 316 stainless steel. Stators are available in many elastomer materials such as Buna Nitrile, Natural Rubber, EPDM and Viton. The standard seal design is a set of gland packing with a lantern ring set and flush connections. Mechanical seal options for this progressive cavity pump are readily available.

The LL8 represents one of the most popular progressive cavity pumps available for the transport of drilling mud with easily replaceable in-stock parts.

containing sand, mud or solids in suspension; clean or dirty low viscosity petroleum product or solvents; milk of lime, caustic soda; washing, cooling, circulation; smoke scrubbing; emergency duty.

• pumping polluted, hot or corrosive waste water containing sand, mud or solids in suspension; dosing neutralizingliquids; pumping out settled sludge.

5-13, smoke scrubbing, water emulsion for machine tools or grinders, cutting or quenching fluid circulation, cooling water circulation in steel mills or drawing mills, neutralizing liquid dosage, pumping out settled sludge, sump pumping liquid manure transfer and circulation.

These pumps are highly renowned for their iso 2858, 5199 standard dimensions, simple & reliable bearing rich experience in design due to our advanced manufacturing facility.

3x2x13 6x5x14 4x3x13 8x6x11 5x4x14 8x6x14 6x5x11 10x8x14 • Barite, ferric oxide, and mineral oil • Base drilling muds • Glass fibers • Sugar processing • Ash or coal conveyers • Cement • Mine de-watering • Lime slurries • Kaolin clay • Crystalline forms Email: Sales7@tobeepump.com Web: www.tobeepump.com | www.slurrypumpsupply.com | www.tobee.cc | www.hydroman.cn

Appellee, Peaker, holds under the aforesaid McNeil assignment[2]. Somewhat similar assignments were executed by others holding interests in the said *31 27 and 28; and appellee, Peaker, became the holder of enough of these assignments to justify him in testing the formations below 3,000 feet in said Sections 27 and 28. Peaker first drilled a well in the SE¼ NE¼ of Section 28, known and referred to herein as the "Berg well".[3] He made a contract with Al Grandebush, a recognized driller, to drill the Berg well to a depth of 5,000 feet and to complete it in the Smackover lime. The contract price was $20,000. The time of commencement of this well will be discussed in Topic I, infra.

Grandebush drilled this Berg well to a depth of 3,416 feet, but was unable to carry the well to a greater depth; so he started a new well in the SW¼ NW¼ of Section 27, one-quarter mile to the east, and known as the "Reynolds Brothers well".[4] He actually drilled the Reynolds Brothers well to the Smackover lime. The failure to drill the Berg well to the Smackover lime and the drilling of the Reynolds Brothers well to that formation will be discussed in Topic II, infra.

When Grandebush found that he was unable to drill the Berg well to a depth greater than 3,416 feet, he tested the sand at that depth and brought in a producing oil well. That sand at 3,416 feet is now known as the "Cotton Valley Sand"; and the Berg well was the discovery well of the Cotton Valley Sand in Sections 27 and 28. When Grandebush drilled the Reynolds Brothers well to the Smackover lime (approximate depth 4,800 feet), he found said formation to be non-productive ; so he made the Reynolds Brothers well into a commercial producer from the Cotton Valley Sand. This was on January 18, 1956.

Peaker then prepared to drill on the Murphy lease here involved (SW14 NWJ4 Section 28).[5] On May 5, 1956, appellant, Vickers, and his sisters, filed the present suit to cancel the McNeil assignment under which Peaker claimed. The complaint alleged that the terms of the assignment had been breached by (1) failure to commence the Berg well on September 15, 1955, and also by (2) failure to drill the Berg well to the Smackover lime. Peaker and the other appellees denied both of the said claims; and also made the affirmative defense of laches and estoppel (which will be discussed in Topic III, infra). The Trial Court dismissed the Vickers suit for want of equity, and this appeal ensued: presenting the three points now to be discussed.

The record herein establishes the following: (1) some time prior to September 12, 1955, Peaker entered into a contract with Al Grandebush, whereby Peaker agreed to pay Grandebush $20,000 to drill the Berg well, and Grandebush agreed *32 to drill the well to the Smackover lime, estimated to be between 4,800 and 4,900 feet below the surface; (2) on September 12, 1955, the location was surveyed and cleared; (3) on September 13th a road was constructed to the location; (4) on September 14th a permit was obtained from the Arkansas Oil & Gas Commission to drill the Berg well; (5) by September 15th certain material had been moved to the drill site for the well, including drill pipe, butane tanks, pipe racks, and other material; (6) the entire equipment had been moved to the drill site by October 13, 1955, and on that day actual drilling commenced by the drill bit piercing the earth; (7) in the early part of November, 1955, the well had reached a depth of 3,416 feet, when sand was encountered in such quantities as to cause the mud pump to go out of commission; (8) on November 22, 1955, the Berg well was completed as a producer from the Cotton Valley Sand at 3,416 feet.

II. What Of The Failure To Drill The Berg Well To The Smackover Lime? Appellants insist that the McNeil assignment *33 they executed was forfeited becaus of the failure of Peaker to drill the Berg well to the Smackover lime. The portion of the assignment germane to this point reads:

"Unless the assignee * * * commence the drilling of a well * * * on or before September 15, * * * and completes the same * * * to a depth sufficient to test the Smackover Lime Formation * * *."

Appellants point out that the Berg well was the only well that Peaker could claim to have been commenced on or before September 15th; and that said well admittedly did not go to the Smackover lime. Therefore, appellants claim that their assignment is null and void.

Appellees insist that Peaker did begin the Berg well on or before September 15th, that Peaker was prevented by an unavoidable casualty from drilling the Berg well to the Smackover lime; and that immediately upon said casualty, Peaker began the drilling of the Reynolds Brothers well which went to the Smackover lime. Appellees claim "substantial compliance" with the assignment. Regarding unavoidable casualty: appellees showed that when Grandebush reached the depth of 3,416 feet in the Berg well he ran into so much sand that his mud pump was put out of commission;[7] that it was necessary to have the mud pump sent to Magnolia for repairs; that when the mud pump was put back into operation, Grandebush was unable to get circulation[8] of mud in the drilling of the Berg well. Grandebush testified that he could not afford to continue the drilling of the Berg well until he could get circulation; that his drill stem might become stuck in the sand; that if he tried to pull the drill stem, the derrick might collapse and some of his workmen might be killed or injured. Grandebush testified that he made all of these representations to Peaker; that Peaker still insisted that the Berg well be completed to the Smackover lime; but that finally Peaker reluctantly agreed that a new well (that is, the Reynolds Brothers well) could be drilled to the Smackover lime in lieu of the Berg well being drilled to that depth. The actual drilling of the Reynolds Brothers well commenced on November 15, 1955; the Berg well was not completed as a producer until November 22nd; the Reynolds Brothers well was drilled to the Smackover lime and found unproductive; and then later brought in as a producing well at the Cotton Valley Sand on January 18, 1956. With these facts thus detailed, we leave the second point to go to the matter of estoppel which, coupled with the facts heretofore recited, shows the equities to preponderate in favor of the appellees.

III. Estoppel. We have heretofore stated that the equities preponderated in favor of the appellees; and we now come to that point. The appellant, Vickers, testified that prior to July, 1955, no well had ever been drilled to the Smackover lime in Sections 27 or 28; that he executed the assignment to McNeil (under which appellee, Peaker, holds) in order that a block of sufficient size could be assembled to justify someone to test the Smackover lime; and that he was willing to make his assignment to McNeil to enable such a test to be made. From this, and other evidence in the record, it is clear that Vickers knew that Peaker, in drilling *34 the Berg well and the Reynolds Brothers well, was relying on the validity of the Vickers Assignment to McNeil. Vickers also testified that he visited the location of the Berg well several times; that he knew at all times of the drilling by Peaker of the Berg well and the Reynolds Brothers well; and that, based on information obtained from these wells, Vickers was enabled to successfully drill two wells to the Cotton Valley Formation on another tract in Sections 27 and 28 near the Murphy lease that Vickers was operating. From this evidence it is clear that Vickers used the information from the Berg well and the Reynolds Brothers well to successfully drill wells for himself. Vickers also admitted that he was not damaged in any way, nor his rights prejudiced in any way, by the delay of Peaker in drilling the Berg well or the Reynolds Brothers well to the Smackover lime; that it was not until April 24, 1956, that Vickers first notified Peaker that Vickers considered as forfeited the assignment from Vickers to McNeil; and that this was after Peaker had made a location and started a rightof-way on the Murphy lease.

From the foregoing it is clear that Vickers sat by and remained silent and allowed Peaker to expend at least $40,000 in testing the Smackover lime and proving the Cotton Valley Formation to be productive (all of which information was valuable to Vickers), before Vickers ever indicated in any way that he was going to make any claim of any forfeiture of his assignment under which he knew Peaker was holding and claiming.

[1] The said assignment (on which appellants" suit is based) was prepared by attorneys for appellants, and the part here involved, reads: "Unless the Assignee, his heirs or assigns, commence the drilling of a well in search of oil and/or gas in Section 27 or Section 28, Township 15 S, Range 15 W, on or before September 15, 1955, and drills and completes the same with reasonable diligence to a depth sufficient to test the Smackover lime formation, this Assignment shall ipso facto become null and void and of no effect and all the rights of Assignee herein, his heirs, or assigns, shall terminate and cease. And there is a further condition under which this Assignment is given that all the rights of the Assignee herein, his heirs or assigns, shall cease, terminate, become null and void, unless said Assignee, his heirs or assigns, shall drill and complete a well or wells for actual production of oil and/or gas in commercial quantity therefrom on the lease herein assigned within 12 months from date of this assignment "There is excepted from this conveyance and reserved unto the Assignors herein, their heirs and assigns, all of the oil, gas and other minerals in, on and under said lands belonging to their leasehold interest from the surface to a depth of 3000 feet, and the Assignee herein shall not interfere in his operation with the operation and any development that may be carried on by Assignors, their heirs or assigns to said depth of 3000 feet.

[8] "Circulation of the mud" in a rotary drilling well is a matter of extreme necessity. As the hole is being drilled the mud pumped in the well operates to seal the hole against cave-ins. Unless some portion of the mud be returned to the surface, it becomes evident that the mud is going into some porous formation and is not sealing the hole. The returning of a portion of the mud to the surface is called "circulation". Because the mud pump had to be repaired, the Berg well stood without operation for some time and when the mud pump was reinstalled, Grandebush was never able to get circulation again.