overshot the runway meaning quotation

I understand its meaning in the context, but what does it exactly mean? I tried to Google the idiom, but I found only one hit in Urban Dictionary whose definition doesn"t seem to fit in the context (I don"t want to put it here).

I can"t find the origin of the idiom. I would like to know when and how the idiom started to mean what it means now. I can just speculate it could have started as a military term.

Recent Examples on the Web No one knows if these rapid increases will overshootand push the economy into a recession, causing markets to fall and unemployment.

One risk, O’Leary notes, it that the Fed may overshooton interest rates because the drop in housing prices, which takes 16 to 18 months to be correctly reflected in CPI data, is not being taken into account.

Markets are skittish that the Fed"s actions — which take a while to feed through the system — could overshoot, sending the US economy into a prolonged and deep recession.

These example sentences are selected automatically from various online news sources to reflect current usage of the word "overshoot." Views expressed in the examples do not represent the opinion of Merriam-Webster or its editors. Send us feedback.

2004, Donella Meadows; Jorgen Randers; Dennis Meadows, “Author"s preface”, in Limits to Growth: The 30-Year Update,With appropriate choice and action such uncontrolled decline could be avoided; overshoot could instead be resolved by a conscious effort to reduce humanity"s demand on the planet.

2020, Karen Cheng, Designing Type, second edition, page 88:The bowl of the D and the O are usually not identical, as most D forms do not have overshoot or undershoot.

1961 November, “Talking of Trains: Aircraft on rail tracks”, in Trains Illustrated, page 650:As a result of the accident at Southend Airport when a Hermes aircraft overshot the runway and fouled the down Shenfield to Southend Victoria line between Rochford and Prittlewell, the Eastern Region is considering warning arrangements, which have already been provided on some lines running past aerodromes.

2021 December 15, Paul Clifton, “There is nothing you can do”, in RAIL, number 946, page 37:A ScotRail Driver: [...] A good friend of mine overshot two stations back-to-back a couple of years ago. He tried to stop at one station and slid by it. Tried to stop at the next station. He slid by that, too.

2004, Donella Meadows; Jorgen Randers; Dennis Meadows, “Author"s preface”, in Limits to Growth: The 30-Year Update,Measured this way humanity was last at sustainable levels in the 1980s. Now it has overshot by some 20 percent.

The owner of this website (www.airlinepilotcentral.com) has banned the autonomous system number (ASN) your IP address is in (20473) from accessing this website.

That’s fodder for future research—but even without an overshoot effect, these results add support to the idea that you can and probably should taper your strength training at least a week before a big race.

to cause (an aircraft) to fly or taxi too far along (a runway) during landing or taking off, or (of an aircraft) to fly or taxi too far along a runway

(30) A complete set od wireoline drill tools include:core barrel assembly. overshot assembly, drill rods, holding dog, hoisting plug, circle wrench rtc.

NEW DELHI, Aug 8 (Reuters) - At least 18 people died and 16 were severely injured in southern India on Friday after a Boeing-737 overshot a runway known as a “table-top” in the aviation industry.

The Air India Express plane, which was repatriating Indians stranded in Dubai due to the coronavirus pandemic, overshot the runway of the Calicut International Airport in heavy rain near the southern city of Kozhikode on Friday.

Such runways have steep drops at one or both ends, increasing the possibility of injuries and fatalities if pilots under or overshoot their approach, either through human error or mechanical failure.

They are most commonly found in mountainous areas where flat land is scarce, or in low-lying areas like Kozhikode where space is at a premium or there is fear of waterlogging at ground level.

The table-top runway at Kozhikode is around 2,700 metres (8,858 feet) long, shorter than the 4,430 metres (14,534 feet) runway in the Indian capital New Delhi, though it is long enough for narrowbody aircraft like the Boeing-737 to land.

In May 2010, an Air India flight landing at Mangalore airport overshot the table-top runway there, falling down a hillside and bursting into flames. Of the 166 people on board, only eight survived. The inquest into the crash later blamed pilot error.

Easyjet says it"s cancelled 6 flights from Liverpool John Lennon airport after a private jet overshot the runway early today causing disruption. Easyjet also diverting 4 flights due to land at Liverpool to Manchester. It says it"s offering refunds or transferring to other flights

American Airlines Flight 1420 was a flight from Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport (DFW) to Little Rock National Airport in the United States. On June 1, 1999, the McDonnell Douglas MD-82 operating as Flight 1420 overran the runway upon landing in Little Rock and crashed. 9 of the 145 people aboard were immediately killed—the captain and 8 passengers.

Seating chart for American Airlines Flight 1420 created by the NTSB, revealing the location of passengers and lack of injury, severity of injuries, and deaths.

The aircraft involved in the incident was a McDonnell Douglas MD-82 (registration N215AAMcDonnell Douglas DC-9, and part of the McDonnell Douglas MD-80 series of aircraft.: 12 It was delivered new to American Airlines in 1983, and had been operated continuously by the airline since, accumulating a total of 49,136 flight hours.: 12 The aircraft was powered by two Pratt & Whitney JT8D-217C turbofan jet engines.: 12

The aircraft was equipped with X-band weather radar, which is susceptible to attenuation during heavy precipitation, and did not have an attenuation alert to warn the flight crew of system impairment during heavy rainfall.: 13 The radar weather system had a forward-looking design that offered the flight crew only a limited field of view in front of the aircraft.: 116

Flight 1420 was commanded by Captain Richard Buschmann, age 48, an experienced pilot with 10,234 flight hours, nearly half of which were accumulated flying the MD-80 series of aircraft.: 10 Buschmann graduated from the United States Air Force Academy in 1972, and served in the Air Force until 1979. He held the rank of lieutenant colonel with the US Air Force Reserve Command, and was hired by American Airlines in July 1979. Experienced at flying the Boeing 727 for American, he transitioned to flying the twin-engined MD-80 series in 1991.

The flight"s first officer was Michael Origel, age 35.: 10 The first officer had been with the airline for less than a year, and had only 182 hours of flight time with American Airlines as an MD-80 pilot.: 11 However, the first officer had trained as a pilot with the United States Navy, and had prior commercial flight experience as a corporate pilot, with a total of 4,292 hours of experience at the time of the incident.: 11

Flight 1420 was staffed with four flight attendants, all of whom were qualified on the MD-80, and had recently received refresher training on emergency procedures.: 11

Flight 1420 was scheduled to depart DFW at 20:28 (8:28 pm) Central Daylight Time, and arrive in Little Rock at 21:41 (9:41 pm).: 1 The flight crew was advised before boarding that the departure would be delayed, and that the National Weather Service had issued in-flight weather advisories indicating severe thunderstorms along the planned flight path.: 2 Adverse weather caused the plane that was intended for Flight 1420 to be delayed in arriving at DFW.: 2 Airline policy set a maximum pilot duty time of 14 hours, and Flight 1420 was the flight crew"s last flight of the day. The first officer notified the airline"s flight dispatcher that the flight crew would, therefore, be unable to depart after 23:16 (11:16 pm).: 2 The airline substituted another MD-80, tail number N215AA, which allowed Flight 1420 to depart DFW at 22:40 (10:40 pm).: 2

At 23:04 (11:04 pm), air traffic controllers issued a weather advisory indicating severe thunderstorms in an area that included the Little Rock airport,: 2 and the flight crew witnessed lightning while on approach.: 3 The flight crew discussed the weather reports, but decided to expedite the approach rather than diverting to the designated alternate airport (Nashville International Airport) or returning to DFW.: 2–3

Air traffic control at Little Rock had originally told Flight 1420 to expect an approach to runway 22L. At 23:39 (11:39 pm), a controller advised the crew of a wind-shear alert and a change in wind direction.: 3 As a result, Captain Buschmann requested a change to Runway 4R, so the flight would have a headwind during landing, and Flight 1420 was cleared for a visual approach to this runway.: 4 Because the plane was already close to the airport, the controller had to direct it away to line it up for a landing on 4R.: 116 As a result, Flight 1420 faced away from the airport for several minutes, and due to the plane"s weather radar capabilities being limited to a narrow and forward-facing field of view, the flight crew could not see thunderstorms approaching the airport during their turn.: 116 As the aircraft approached, a severe thunderstorm arrived over the airport, and at 23:44 (11:44 pm), the first officer notified the controller that the crew had lost sight of the runway.: 4 The controller then cleared the aircraft to land on 4R using an instrument landing system (ILS) approach.: 4

The pilots rushed to land as soon as possible, leading to errors in judgment that included the crew"s failure to complete the airline"s pre-landing checklist before descending.: 122 This was a crucial event in the accident chain, as the crew overlooked multiple critical landing systems on the checklist. The flight crew failed to arm the automatic spoiler system, which automatically moves the spoiler control lever, and deploys the spoilers upon landing.: 15–16 The pilots also failed to set the plane"s automatic braking system.: 21 The flight crew also failed to set landing flaps, another item on the preflight checklist, but as the plane descended past 1,000 feet (300 m), the first officer realized the flaps were not set, and the flight crew set a 40° flap setting for landing.: 123

At 23:49:32 (11:49:32 pm), the controller issued the last weather report before Flight 1420 landed, and advised that winds at the airport were 330° at 25 knots (29 mph; 46 km/h).: 6 The reported winds exceeded the MD-82"s 20-knot (23 mph; 37 km/h) crosswind limit for landing in reduced visibility on a wet runway.: 3 Despite the excessive crosswind and two wind-shear reports, Captain Buschmann did not abandon the aircraft"s approach into Little Rock, and deciding to continue the approach to 4R instead.

The aircraft touched down on Runway 4R at 23:50:20 (11:50:20 pm). About two seconds after the wheels touched down, First Officer Origel stated, “We"re down. We"re sliding!” Because the pilots failed to arm the autospoiler, the spoilers did not deploy automatically on landing, and the flight crew did not deploy them manually.: 167 Autospoilers and autobrakes are essential to ensure the plane"s ability to stop within the confines of a wet runway, especially one that is being subjected to strong and gusting winds. Spoilers disrupt the airflow over the wings, prevent them from generating lift, and cause more of the plane"s weight to be borne by the landing gear. About 65% of Flight 1420"s weight would have been supported by the plane"s landing gear if the spoilers had been deployed, but without the spoilers, this number dropped to only 15%.: 134 With the light loading of the landing gear, the aircraft"s brakes were ineffective at slowing down the plane, which continued down the runway at high speed.: 134–135 Directional control was lost when Captain Buschmann applied too much reverse thrust, which reduced the effectiveness of the plane"s rudder and vertical stabilizer.: 135–136

The aircraft continued past the end of the runway, traveling another 800 feet (240 m; 270 yd), and striking a security fence and an ILS localizer array. The aircraft then collided with a structure built to support the approach lights for Runway 22L, which extended out into the Arkansas River.: 43 Such structures are usually frangible, designed to shear off on impact, but because the approach lights were located on the unstable river bank, they were firmly anchored.: 159 The collision with the sturdy structure crushed the airplane"s nose, and destroyed the left side of the plane"s fuselage, from the cockpit back to the first two rows of coach seating.: 159 The impact broke the aircraft apart into large sections, which came to a rest short of the river bank.: 43

Captain Buschmann and 8 of the plane"s 139 passengers were immediately killed in the crash; another two passengers died in the hospital in the weeks that followed.: 47: 47

The plane’s cockpit voice recorder (CVR) was reviewed, and no sounds consistent with the spoiler arming or automatically deploying were recorded by the CVR.: 42 The NTSB conducted two test flights of American Airlines MD-80 aircraft, which confirmed that manually arming the spoiler created an audible “click” noise—distinguishable from noises made by automatic deployment of the system—that could be clearly heard on CVR playback.: 42 The NTSB also conducted ground tests on similar aircraft, including another American Airlines MD-80, for which the autospoiler system failed to deploy during a runway overrun event in Palm Springs, California, but did not result in destruction of the aircraft.: 55

After Flight 1420 and the Palm Springs incident, American Airlines revised its checklist so pilots would confirm that the spoilers are armed for autodeployment before landing, confirm spoiler deployment, and deploy spoilers manually if they had failed to automatically deploy.: 87

The NTSB investigation also focused on pilot behavior in inclement weather, to determine the impact the storms may have had on the pilots" decision-making process while approaching Little Rock National Airport.

Experts from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology performed a study that recorded the behavior of pilots landing at Dallas/Fort Worth Airport,: 142 which aimed to see whether pilots were willing to land in thunderstorms. From a total of 1,952 thunderstorm encounters, 1,310 pilots (67%) flew into thunderstorms during landing attempts.: 142 The study found that pilots exhibited more recklessness if they fell behind schedule, if they were attempting to land at night, and if aircraft in front of them successfully landed in similar weather. In a later interview, Greg Feith, the lead NTSB investigator, said he was surprised to learn that pilots exhibited this behavior.

The NTSB report cited fatigue as a contributing factor. The captain had been awake for 16 hours that day;: 106 research indicates that after being awake for 13 hours, pilots make considerably more mistakes.: 157 The time of the crash occurred several hours after both pilots’ usual bedtime.: 106 The first officer reported feeling tired that night, and a yawn was heard on the CVR.: 157 The report stated that sleep-deprived individuals are likely to try the same method of problem solving repeatedly without regard to alternatives.

The National Transportation Safety Board determines that the probable causes of this accident were the flight crew’s failure to discontinue the approach when severe thunderstorms and their associated hazards to flight operations had moved into the airport area, and the crew’s failure to ensure that the spoilers had extended after touchdown.

Contributing to the accident were the flight crew’s ⑴ impaired performance resulting from fatigue, and the situational stress associated with the intent to land under the circumstances; ⑵ continuation of the approach to a landing when the company’s maximum crosswind component was exceeded; and ⑶ use of reverse thrust greater than 1.3 engine pressure ratio after landing.

Multiple lawsuits were filed after the crash, and on December 15, 1999, the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation consolidated the various federal lawsuits for consolidated and coordinated pretrial proceedings, and assigned the case to United States District Court Senior Judge Henry Woods of the Eastern District of Arkansas. In the lawsuits, the passengers sought compensatory and punitive damages from American Airlines.

Judge Woods separated the passenger cases into those involving domestic and international passengers, because different laws governed the rights of the claimants in each category. For example, passengers traveling on international tickets were prohibited by an international treaty (the Warsaw Convention) from recovering punitive damages. Therefore, Judge Woods ruled that only the domestic passengers would be permitted to pursue punitive damages claims.

The compensatory damages claims proceeded first. American Airlines “admitted liability for the crash, and individual trials were scheduled to assess the proper amount of compensatory damages. Thereafter, American Airlines reached settlement agreements with a majority of the domestic Plaintiffs.”

As part of the settlement agreement, “Plaintiffs relinquished not only their compensatory damages claims, but their punitive damages claims, as well.”

In the only liability trial arising out of the crash of Flight 1420, a federal jury in Little Rock awarded Captain Buschmann’s family $2 million in wrongful-death damages following a lawsuit they had filed against Little Rock National Airport.runway safety area. The airport was found to have failed to comply with airport safety standards. Buschmann’s estate presented evidence that the spoilers were deployed and had malfunctioned (not through the captain’s fault), and that the aircraft did not encounter turbulence.

A 2004 memorial ceremony was held adjacent to the airport. Survivor Jeana Varnell attended the ceremony, but was quoted in a newspaper article as saying that she strongly objected to memorializing Captain Buschmann.

Since the death of victim Debra Taylor-Sattari, her father has elaborately decorated the exterior of his home in Vallejo, California with Christmas lights and decorations every year in her honor, which has gained attention from local and national media. However, 2022 was the last year he repeated this annual tradition.

The events of Flight 1420 were featured in "Racing the Storm," a season one (2003) episode of the Canadian TV series Air Emergency and Air Disasters in the U.S., and Air Crash Investigation in the UK and elsewhere around the world). The dramatization was broadcast in the United States with the title “Fatal Landing.” The flight was also included in a Mayday season-eight (2009) Science of Disaster special titled "Cruel Skies,"

"Over $14 Million for Victims of American Airlines Little Rock Airplane Crash". Rapoport Law Offices, P.C. February 4, 2011. Retrieved September 15, 2011. A jury found the airport was liable and awarded the captain"s family $2m in wrongful death damages ... the jury found the captain was not at fault in causing his own death ... the passenger injury and wrongful death cases were based on pilot error and the airline admitted liability in all these cases ... the NTSB has not revised its probable cause finding that focused completely on pilot error

"Over $14 Million for Victims of American Airlines Little Rock Airplane Crash". Rapoport, Weisberg, & Sims P.C. February 4, 2011. Archived from the original on January 16, 2023. Retrieved January 16, 2023.

entity pursuant the Georgia Administrative Procedures Act, O.C.G.A.§ 50-13-7(d) contact the State of Georgia"s Administrative Procedures Division at 678-364-3785 to enable these features for your location.)

Pakistan International Airlines made it to the news again yesterday when one of its few functional ATR 42 aircraft overshot the runway at Gilgit Airport. The 12-year-old ATR42-500 registered as AP-BHP and named “Gilgit” after the city where it ironically had the incident, was operating on the flight PK605, the daily service of PIA from the capital Islamabad to Gilgit.

The aircraft left Islamabad on time around 07 00 local time and overshot the runway upon landing. All 53 people including crew evacuated the aircraft safely and no injuries were reported either. The undercarriage of the aircraft is likely to be damaged. Although the aircraft does not look like it may be damaged beyond repair, it will likely take long before it is back in the skies. A long landing after the landing zone is reported to be the cause of the incident whereas some resources quote that the Anti-Skid function was not working. Very few sources also mention the thrust reversers were faulty too.

The flight crew in command of the flight has been grounded until investigations take place and the original cause is brought forth. What is surprising though that there has been no statement from the airline on any social media platform acknowledging the incident and giving any information regarding it either.

Gilgit, a small city located in the northernmost area of Pakistan is a year-round tourist destination for locals and foreign tourists. The city is located in a valley in the Karakoram range, meaning limited access for transportation. Gilgit’s airport is very small and has a very difficult approach which requires a left turn to turn into finals for the runways only a few miles out. The runway is also quite small due to its position in the valley and the airport has encountered many accidents previously.

This is also the 3rd ATR incident PIA has to face in less than a year which now includes 2 runway overshoots and 1 on ground collision. How well does the crisis struck airline deal with this is a big question and raises further questions on the CEO’s claim for a“Completely operational”fleet?