rongsheng li price

Stock Movers: Gainers, decliners and most actives market activity tables are a combination of NYSE, Nasdaq, NYSE American and NYSE Arca listings. Sources: FactSet, Dow Jones

Data are provided "as is" for informational purposes only and are not intended for trading purposes. FactSet (a) does not make any express or implied warranties of any kind regarding the data, including, without limitation, any warranty of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose or use; and (b) shall not be liable for any errors, incompleteness, interruption or delay, action taken in reliance on any data, or for any damages resulting therefrom. Data may be intentionally delayed pursuant to supplier requirements.

Mutual Funds & ETFs: All of the mutual fund and ETF information contained in this display, with the exception of the current price and price history, was supplied by Lipper, A Refinitiv Company, subject to the following: Copyright 2019© Refinitiv. All rights reserved. Any copying, republication or redistribution of Lipper content, including by caching, framing or similar means, is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of Lipper. Lipper shall not be liable for any errors or delays in the content, or for any actions taken in reliance thereon.

RONGSHENG PETROCHEMICAL CO., LTD. is a China-based company principally engaged in the research, development, manufacture and distribution of chemicals and chemical fibers. The Company’s main products include aromatics, phosphotungstic acid (PTA), polyethylene terephthalate (PET) chips, terylene pre-oriented yarns (POYs), terylene fully drawn yarns (FDYs) and terylene draw textured yarns (DTYs), among others. The Company distributes its products in domestic market and to...More

This website is using a security service to protect itself from online attacks. The action you just performed triggered the security solution. There are several actions that could trigger this block including submitting a certain word or phrase, a SQL command or malformed data.

is a senior technical fellow at Boeing Research & Technology. He received his Ph.D. in electrical engineering systems from the University of Southern California. He holds 41 patents and is a member of IEEE.

BEIJING, Aug 14 (Reuters) - Rongsheng Petrochemical , the listed arm of a major shareholder in one of China’s biggest private oil refineries, expects demand for energy and chemical products to return to normal in the country in the second half of this year.

The Zhejiang-based Chinese private refiner saw profit more than triple in the first half of 2020, bolstered by the launch of its 400,000 barrel-per-day Zhejiang Petrochemical Co (ZPC), according to a stock exchange filing earlier this week.

Rongsheng expects to start trial operations of the second phase of the refining project, adding another 400,000 bpd of refining capacity and 1.4 million tonnes of ethylene production capacity in the fourth quarter of 2020.

“We expect the effects of the coronavirus pandemic on energy and chemicals to have basically faded in spite of the possibility of new waves of outbreak,” said Quan Weiying, board secretary of Rongsheng, in response to Reuters questions in an online briefing.

But Li Shuirong, president of Rongsheng, told the briefing that it was still in the process of applying for an export quota and would adjust production based on market demand. (Reporting by Muyu Xu and Chen Aizhu; Editing by Jacqueline Wong)

Quick Facts Rongsheng has an associate degree. Current occupation is listed as Clerical/White Collar. Rongsheng was born on 12.31.61. Rongsheng"s age is 61. Rongsheng is a resident of 2521 Anvil Tree Lanes, Hacienda Heights, CA 91745-5602. This address has been used for business registration by Li & Cheung For Better World Foundation. We know that Tina Cheung and Wei J Ge also lived at this address, perhaps within a different time frame. (626) 968-0680 is the phone number for Rongsheng. The property at 02521 Anvil Tree Ln , 917450000 belongs to Rongsheng Li. Monthly rental prices for a two-bedroom unit in the zip code 91745 is around $2,160

The population of the US is 329,484,123 people (estimated 2020). There are at least 3 records for Rongsheng S Li in our database alone. People with the same last name and sometimes even full name can become a real headache to search — for example, Mary Hart is found in our records 1,520 times.

Foreign surnames can be transliterated and even translated (e.g. Seaman vs. Marino). Sometimes names in public records are misspelled due to silly typos and OCR errors. For example, Darbonne could be listed as Barbonne. Make sure to check as many variants as possible.

This surname is found in public records in various versions, some of which are Lee, Zhang, Smith, Yu, Chang, Zheng, Cheng, Yan, Zhao, Yi, Hong, Ling, Ali, Xiao

Rongsheng S Li can be found on facebook https://www.facebook.com/search/top/?q=Rongsheng+Li&epa=SEARCH_BOX. If this link does not work for you, you can also use FB directory https://www.facebook.com/directory/people/. Note, Facebook may ask you to prove you"re not a bot - just solve CAPTCHA.

Lin Rongsheng is a Chinese Asian Modern & Contemporary artist who was born in 1958. Lin Rongsheng"s work has been offered at auction multiple times, with realized prices ranging from 254 USD to 119,642 USD, depending on the size and medium of the artwork. Since 2011 the record price for this artist at auction is 119,642 USD for LANDSCAPE OF LAO SHAN, sold at Poly International Auction Co. in 2014.

Trading of shares and all structured products related to the company was suspended pending clarification of “news articles and possible inside information,” Rongsheng said in filings to the Hong Kong stock exchange. The Wall Street Journal reported yesterday, citing Lei Dong, secretary to the Shanghai- based company’s president, that more than half of the employees laid off were subcontractors and the rest full-time workers.

Rongsheng shares slumped 10 percent yesterday after the company said some idled contract workers had engaged in “disruptive” activities by surrounding the entrance of its factory in east China’s Jiangsu province. China’s shipyards are suffering from a global slump in orders as a glut of vessels and slowing economic growth sap demand. Brazil and Greece accounted for more than half of Rongsheng’s 2012 revenue.

“Rongsheng’s move reflects the bad market,” said Lawrence Li, an analyst at UOB-Kay Hian Holdings Ltd. in Shanghai. “More small-to-medium sized shipyards, especially those that lack government support, may take the same actions or even close down.”

Rongsheng spokesman William Li declined to comment on the Journal report. Four calls to Lei’s office at Rongsheng went unanswered. Rongsheng Chairman Chen Qiang also declined to comment today.

Rongsheng had as many as 38,000 workers including its own employees and contract staff at the peak of the industry boom a few years ago, UOB-Kay Hian’s Li said.

The order book at China’s shipbuilders fell 23 percent at the end of May from a year earlier, according to data from the China Association of the National Shipbuilding Industry. Yards have reduced down-payment requirements, with some slashing their rates to as little as 2.5 percent of contract value compared with 20 percent before 2010, according to UOB-Kay Hian.

China Rongsheng posted a loss of 572.6 million yuan ($93 million) last year, after three consecutive years of profits, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. It had short-term debt of 19.3 billion yuan as of the end of 2012, the data show.

The shipbuilder targets new ship and offshore orders worth more than $2.3 billion this year, Chen said in Hong Kong in March. The shipbuilder pared about 3,000 employees last year as it aims to return to profit this year, he said at the time.

Rongsheng received orders to build a total of 16 Valemax vessels from Brazilian miner Vale SA and Oman Shipping Co. and had delivered 10 as of April. The commodity ships, among the biggest afloat, are about twice the size of the capesize vessels that have traditionally hauled iron ore from Brazil to China.

The company’s cash conversion cycle, a gauge of days required to convert resources into cash, more than doubled to 582 last year from 224 in 2011, the data show. China Rongsheng shares have fallen 15 percent this year in Hong Kong, compared with a 11 percent decline for the benchmark Hang Seng Index.

Ten of the 14 analysts tracked by Bloomberg recommend selling the stock with the rest rating it hold. The company raised HK$14 billion in its initial public offer in 2010.

Ship prices have plunged because of the overcapacity and industrywide losses, hurting margins at shipbuilders. Prices for a vessel that can carry as many as 13,500 boxes fell to $106 million in April, which was then the

PO Box, Afghanistan, Africa, Albania, American Samoa, Andorra, Armenia, Austria, Azerbaijan Republic, Bahrain, Bangladesh, Belarus, Bermuda, Bhutan, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Brunei Darussalam, Cambodia, Central America and Caribbean, China, Cook Islands, Denmark, Estonia, Fiji, Finland, France, French Polynesia, Georgia, Germany, Gibraltar, Greenland, Guam, Guernsey, Hong Kong, India, Indonesia, Iraq, Ireland, Jersey, Jordan, Kazakhstan, Kiribati, Kuwait, Kyrgyzstan, Laos, Latvia, Lebanon, Liechtenstein, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Macau, Macedonia, Malaysia, Maldives, Malta, Marshall Islands, Mexico, Micronesia, Moldova, Monaco, Mongolia, Montenegro, Nauru, Nepal, New Caledonia, Niue, Oman, Pakistan, Palau, Papua New Guinea, Philippines, Qatar, Russian Federation, Saint Pierre and Miquelon, San Marino, Saudi Arabia, Serbia, Slovenia, Solomon Islands, South America, South Korea, Svalbard and Jan Mayen, Taiwan, Tajikistan, Tonga, Turkey, Turkmenistan, Tuvalu, Ukraine, United Arab Emirates, Uzbekistan, Vanuatu, Vatican City State, Vietnam, Wallis and Futuna, Western Samoa, Yemen

An intense substorm activity persisted for about 20 h from 22:00 UT on 27 May 2017. During this time interval, all four MMS satellites were located in the magnetotail plasma sheet (See Supplementary Fig. 1) and detected several events of ion flow reversal. Here, we concentrate on the event at around 4:00 UT on 28 May when MMS was at [−19.2, −11.3, 3.2] Re in Geocentric Solar Ecliptic (GSE) coordinates. In this event, the Alfvénic ion flow reversed from tailward to earthward and then continued for more than one hour (See Supplementary Fig. 2). In this work, we will concentrate on the time interval of the ion flow reversal shown in Fig. 1. The data from MMS 1 was used unless otherwise stated.

a Three components of the magnetic field. The black arrow marks the temporary excursion (03:58:10–03:58:25 UT) when the spacecraft shortly left the current sheet center and then returned again. b The ion bulk flows. c Three components of the electric field. d The electron bulk flows. The black arrows represent the separatrix regions. e Parallel and perpendicular electron temperatures. f The magnitude of current density (black curve), and the background current density (red curve). g Energetic electron (47–500 KeV) omnidirectional differential flux. h Electron (0.1–30 KeV) omnidirectional differential flux. The shadow area corresponds to the presence of energetic electrons. The area between two vertical black dashed lines at 03:58:07 and 03:58:43 UT represents the X-line region.

The ion flow reversed at around 03:58:45 UT, from tailward to earthward (Fig. 1b) as the spacecraft crossed the plasma sheet from the southern hemisphere (\({B}_{x} < 0\)) to the northern hemisphere (\({B}_{x} > 0\), Fig. 1a). The tailward ion flow \({v}_{ix}\) was down to −700 km/s (0.4 VA) at around 03:58:04 UT, and the earthward flows exceeded 400 km/s (0.24 VA) at around 03:59:50 UT, where VA is 1700 km/s, based on N = 0.1 cm−3 and |B| = 25 nT. It indicates that MMS passed through an X-line region from tailward to earthward. The electron bulk flow \({v}_{ex}\) (blue trace in Fig. 1d) was much stronger than the ion flow and displayed a similar overall reversal at around 03:58:45 UT. Moreover, \({v}_{ex}\) showed a few more reversals with simultaneous enhancements of electric field fluctuations (Fig. 1c), e.g., at around 03:57:30, 03:57:44, 03:59:33, 03:59:40, and 03:59:57 UT (the arrows at the top of Fig. 1d), which could correspond to the separatrix regions. The electric field Ez was mainly positive below the current sheet and negative above it (red trace in Fig. 1c), consistent with the Hall electric field. The electrons were significantly heated to 8 keV during the ion flow reversal (Fig. 1e, h). Based on the analysis above, it is concluded that the spacecraft entered the ion diffusion region during this time interval.

The ion flow \({v}_{ix}\) did not reverse gradually, as reported previouslyBx| was <20 nT and changed the sign several times. It indicates that MMS was basically located around the current sheet center. According to the standard collisionless reconnection modelde) should have been detected. The fact is that many current spikes were detected instead of a single compact electron current layer (Fig. 1f). The current density was very strong, sometimes over 100 nA/m2, inside the X-line region.

Figure 2a–d shows three components and the magnitude of the current density around the X-line region. Jx and Jy were stronger than Jz. Jy was primarily positive. The currents in all three directions (Fig. 2a–c) displayed well-separated spikes, and so did the total current density (Fig. 2d). It means that the current sheet had been fully fragmented. In order to determine the common features of these current spikes, we identified all of the spikes with a local maximum >30 nA/m2 in Fig. 2d (See “Methods, Identification of current spikes”). A total of 254 current spikes were identified inside the X-line region. The relation between the peak values of the |J| spikes and |Bx| can be found in Fig. 3a. Overall, the peak values declined as |Bx| became large, in agreement with the Harris-type current sheet in the magnetotailBx = 0) than those dominated by the perpendicular component (blue points), consistent with the current profile across EDR

a–c Three components of the current density. d The magnitude of current density (black curve), and the background current density (red curve) observed by MMS1. e The magnitude of current density (black curve), and the background current density (red curve) observed by MMS4. f Three components of the disturbed magnetic field δB. The background magnetic fields below fci (0.14 Hz) have been removed. g The comparisons between E⊥ with \(-({{{{{{\bf{V}}}}}}}_{e}\times {{{{{\bf{B}}}}}})\) and \(-({{{{{{\bf{V}}}}}}}_{{{{{{\rm{i}}}}}}}\times {{{{{\bf{B}}}}}})\) in Y-GSE direction. The area between two vertical black dashed lines at 03:58:07 and 03:58:43 UT represents the X-line region.

a The scatter plot of Bx and the peak values of the current spikes \({J}_{{{{{\rm{peak}}}}}}\). The blue and pink dots represent the spikes dominated by the perpendicular and parallel currents, respectively. b The scatter plot of \({{{{{\bf{J}}}}}}\cdot ({{{{{\bf{E}}}}}}{{{{{\boldsymbol{+}}}}}}{{{{{{\bf{V}}}}}}}_{{{{{{\bf{e}}}}}}}\times {{{{{\bf{B}}}}}})\) and current density intensity |J|. The left axis shows the sum of \({{{{{\bf{J}}}}}}\cdot ({{{{{\bf{E}}}}}}+{{{{{{\bf{V}}}}}}}_{{{{{{\bf{e}}}}}}}\times {{{{{\bf{B}}}}}})\) in each current bin. The green and blue dashed lines are the sums of positive and negative \({{{{{\bf{J}}}}}}\cdot ({{{{{\bf{E}}}}}}+{{{{{{\bf{V}}}}}}}_{{{{{{\bf{e}}}}}}}\times {{{{{\bf{B}}}}}})\) in each current bin, and the red dashed line is the sum of \({{{{{\bf{J}}}}}}\cdot ({{{{{\bf{E}}}}}}+{{{{{{\bf{V}}}}}}}_{{{{{{\bf{e}}}}}}}\times {{{{{\bf{B}}}}}})\) (net dissipation) in each current bin. The bin size is 10 nA/m2. c, d The histogram of the number and duration of the current spikes. The blue, green, and red bars represent the currents of spikes dominated in the x, y, and z components, respectively. The data used in Fig. 3 are from the time period (03:58:07–03:58:43 UT) marked by two vertical black dashed lines when the MMS was located in the X-line region.

Inside the X-line region, there was a temporary excursion (03:58:10–03:58:25 UT) with a Bx minimum of −18 nT (marked by the black arrow in Fig. 1a). It indicates that the spacecraft shortly left the background current sheet center and then returned. Thus, the speed of the plasma sheet relative to the spacecraft was roughly estimated to be about 250 km/s (See “Methods, Estimation of the current sheet speed”). The duration of the spikes was very short (Fig. 3d) and <180 ms for most of them (90%). Given the various durations between 360 and 90 ms, their thicknesses varied from 5.4 and 1.3 de, where de = 17 km is the electron inertial length based on N = 0.1 cm−3. These current spikes corresponded to FCs. Therefore, a complex three-dimensional FC system was observed in the X-line region, analogous to the web of current filaments in numerical simulations

Because of thin and dynamic FCs in the X-line region, electric field and magnetic field fluctuations were very strong (Fig. 2f, g). The variation of the magnetic field δB and the electric field was intense inside the X-line region. δB was related to the FCs (Fig. 2d, f). The intense disturbed magnetic field was mainly observed at the region with strong current spikes. It indicates that the thin and dynamic current filaments can generate strong magnetic field fluctuations. This relation can be found more clearly in Fig. 4d, e, where FCs in a short interval near Bx = 0 were expanded. In Fig. 4f, the perpendicular electric field \({E}_{\perp ,y}\), \(-{({{{{{{\bf{V}}}}}}}_{{{{{{\bf{e}}}}}}}\times {{{{{\bf{B}}}}}})}_{y}\), \(-{({{{{{{\bf{V}}}}}}}_{i}\times {{{{{\bf{B}}}}}})}_{y}\) are displayed. \(-{({{{{{{\bf{V}}}}}}}_{i}\times {{{{{\bf{B}}}}}})}_{y}\) was close to zero and distinct from \(-{({{{{{{\bf{V}}}}}}}_{{{{{{\bf{e}}}}}}}\times {{{{{\bf{B}}}}}})}_{y}\) and \({E}_{\perp ,y}\). Moreover, the difference between \(-{({{{{{{\bf{V}}}}}}}_{{{{{{\bf{e}}}}}}}\times {{{{{\bf{B}}}}}})}_{y}\) and \({E}_{\perp ,y}\) was evident. It means that the ions and electrons were both decoupled from the magnetic field lines inside these FCs. This situation was the same also inside the whole X-line region (Fig. 2g).

Since the electrons were decoupled from magnetic field lines, the non-ideal electric field would be generated. Considering the difference between \(-{({{{{{{\bf{V}}}}}}}_{{{{{{\bf{e}}}}}}}\times {{{{{\bf{B}}}}}})}_{y}\) and \({E}_{\perp ,y}\) varied largely (Fig. 2g), the non-ideal electric field should be developed non-uniformly in the X-line region. The energy dissipation in the electron frame\({{{{{\bf{J}}}}}}\cdot ({{{{{\bf{E}}}}}}+{{{{{{\bf{V}}}}}}}_{e}\times {{{{{\bf{B}}}}}})\) was intense but randomly negative or positive. The negative and positive values were separately summed in each current bin and the results were shown in blue and green dotted curves in Fig. 3b, respectively. The net \({{{{{\bf{J}}}}}}\cdot ({{{{{\bf{E}}}}}}+{{{{{{\bf{V}}}}}}}_{e}\times {{{{{\bf{B}}}}}})\) within each bin was shown in red. The energy dissipation strongly depended on the intensity of the current density. In the region with weak current (<30 nA/m2), the negative \({{{{{\bf{J}}}}}}\cdot ({{{{{\bf{E}}}}}}+{{{{{{\bf{V}}}}}}}_{e}\times {{{{{\bf{B}}}}}})\) means a dynamo process there. In the region with a current larger than 30 nA/m2, \({{{{{\bf{J}}}}}}\cdot ({{{{{\bf{E}}}}}}+{{{{{{\bf{V}}}}}}}_{e}\times {{{{{\bf{B}}}}}})\) was basically positive. Namely, magnetic energy was released to energize plasma.

Figure 5a shows the power spectral density (PSD) of Bz (black curve) and \({E}_{y}+{E}_{x}\) (purple curve) inside the X-line region. The PSD of magnetic and electric fields both followed the power laws and had a spectral break near the lower-hybrid frequency (flh). Between ion cyclotron frequency (fci) and lower-hybrid frequency (flh), the spectral index of the magnetic field was −2.31, while the electric field had a shallow spectral index (−1.26). Above flh, magnetic and electric fields had steeper spectra, and their indexes were −3.3 and −2.96, respectively. It indicates that the diffusion region had evolved into a turbulent state while MMS crossed it. This turbulence could be generated by the thin and dynamic current network. The FCs were also detected outside of the X-line region (before 03:58:07 UT and after 03:58:43 UT) and were concurrent with the increases in the ion flow \({v}_{ix}\) (Fig. 1b, f). The generation of these FCs can be due to the reconnection outflows as reported previously

a Power spectral density of the \({E}_{x}+{E}_{y}\)(purple curve) and the Bz(black curve) during 03:58:07–03:58:43 UT (X-line region). The vertical dashed lines represent the average ion cyclotron frequency (fci = 0.14 Hz), average lower-hybrid frequency (flh = 7 Hz), and average electron cyclotron frequency (fce = 260 Hz). The colored lines are power-law fits to specific frequency bands. b Electron distribution functions at different times (the black trace represents the background) with error bars showing the uncertainty as \(1/\sqrt{N}\), where N is the total number of counts in each energy channel. The dashed lines show two pieces of fitting, the Maxwell fitting, and the power-law fitting. Data Points with >100% uncertainty have been removed. The top axis represents the relativistic factor.

Figure 1g and h shows the differential fluxes of electrons in the energy ranges of 47–500 keV and 0.1–30 keV, respectively. The electron fluxes were greatly heightened from 2 to about 300 keV in the vicinity of the X-line region (the shadow area in Fig. 1). The fluxes of electrons above 50 keV increased by two orders of magnitude relative to the background value. This indicates that the electrons were substantially energized up to 300 keV in the X-line region, relative to the thermal electrons <1 keV at around 03:57 UT. The energetic electrons displayed a power-law distribution with a nearly consistent index of 8.0 in the X-line region (Fig. 5b).

Although the energetic electron fluxes maintained a high level in the X-line region, a few further localized enhancements were detected (Fig. 6b) and corresponded to the gray and yellow bars in Fig. 6a. The further enhancements at around 03:58:06 and 03:58:43 UT were clear and correlated to the strong |BZ| (Fig. 6a) at the two ends of the X-line region. At the tailward end (the first bar) with \({{{{{{\rm{B}}}}}}}_{{{{{{\rm{Z}}}}}}} < 0\), the flux enhancement first appeared at around 90° from 50 to 300 keV at 03:58:04 UT, and 3 s later, the enhancements began to occur at 0° and 180° also from 10 to 300 keV (Fig. 6c, d). At the earthward end with \({{{{{{\rm{B}}}}}}}_{{{{{{\rm{Z}}}}}}} > 0\) (03:58:43 UT, the last bar), the flux enhancement was only observed at 90°. Immediately out of the two ends, the ion bulk flow \({v}_{ix}\) was sharply intensified (Fig. 1b). Thus, the two ends with strong |BZ| corresponded to the pile-up regions of the magnetic field BZ. At the pile-up regions, the electrons would be accelerated in the perpendicular direction since the gradient drift was along the induced electric field direction, as suggested in simulations

a Three components of the magnetic field. The yellow and gray bars represent the further localized enhancements of energetic electron fluxes. b Energetic electron (47–300 KeV) omnidirectional differential flux. c Electron pitch angle distribution during 10–30 KeV. d Electron pitch angle distribution during 50–300 KeV; e The total disturbed magnetic energy below the ions scale (the frequency great than fci), |δB|2, and the total flux during 30–300 KeV (pink curve). The blue bar corresponds to an isolated 3D vortex structure. The area between two vertical black dashed lines at 03:58:07 and 03:58:43 UT represents the X-line region.

Inside the X-line region, further flux enhancements were observed at least at four places (around 03:58:13, 03:58:19, 03:58:27, and 03:58:35 UT, yellow bars in Fig. 6a). At around 03:58:19 and 03:58:35 UT, the further enhancements were associated with a peak and a valley of BZ, respectively. The electrons displayed field-aligned bi-directional distribution at energies of 10–30 keV and 90° flux increase at energies of 50–300 keV at these two places (Fig. 6c, d). There was another deep valley of BZ from 03:58:29 to 03:58:32 UT, and energetic electron fluxes were moderately enhanced, with a similar pitch angle distribution to those at the BZ peak and valley mentioned above. Since the similar pitch angle distribution of energetic electrons was observed, the acceleration mechanisms could be the same at those locations and be related to some kinds of magnetic structures. The field-aligned bi-directional distribution of the electrons at the relatively low energy (10–30 keV) indicates these magnetic structures could be closed. The betatron acceleration

Another two further flux enhancements were observed at around 03:58:13 and 03:58:27 UT when no clear peak or valley of BZ was detected. The energetic electrons from 10 to 300 keV exhibited flux enhancements at 90°, and the field-aligned bi-directional distribution disappeared. The 90° flux enhancement for the electrons above 50 keV (Fig. 6d) was persistently observed from 03:58:21 to 03:58:46 UT. Namely, this kind of distribution was common for the electrons above 50 keV inside the turbulent diffusion region. In contrast, the field-aligned bi-directional distribution was primarily associated with the peak or valley of BZ. In addition, the flux enhancement merely at 0° can be occasionally observed, e.g., at around 03:58:20, 03:58:33 UT in Fig. 6d. The complex electron pitch angle distribution indicates the electrons could experience multiple acceleration mechanisms inside the turbulent diffusion region.

The fluxes of energetic electrons at energies of 50–300 keV were collocated in Fig. 6e with the disturbed magnetic field energy density (|δB|2). |δB|2 had much more peaks than the fluxes. In addition to the isolated peaks at the pile-up regions, the electron fluxes kept a relatively high level between 03:58:18 and 03:58:44 UT when amplitudes of |δB|2 peaks were large too. The correlation between fluxes and the disturbed magnetic field energy density indicates that electron acceleration inside the X-line region was related to turbulence. Given the special magnetic structures inside the turbulent diffusion region, the electrons would experience second-order Fermi acceleration