asme safety valve code made in china

There are various safety valves available to meet various applications and performance criteria demanded by various industries. Furthermore, national standards determine many types of varied safety valves.

Standard ASME I and ASME VIII standards for boiler applications and vessels and ASME / ANSI PTC 25.3 standards for safety valves and relief valves provide the following definition. These standards set performance characteristics and define various types of safety valves used:

ASME I valve - A safety relief valve conforming to the requirements of Section I of the ASME pressure vessel code for boiler applications which will open within 3% overpressure and close within 4%. It will usually feature two blowdown rings and is identified by a National Board ‘V’ stamp.

ASME VIII valve - A safety relief valve conforming to the requirements of Section VIII of the ASME pressure vessel code for pressure vessel applications which will open within 10% overpressure and close within 7%. Identified by a National Board ‘UV’ stamp.

Full bore safety valve - A safety valve having no protrusions in the bore, and wherein the valve lifts to an extent sufficient for the minimum area at any section, at or below the seat, to become the controlling orifice.

Conventional safety relief valve - The spring housing is vented to the discharge side, hence operational characteristics are directly affected by changes in the backpressure to the valve.

Balanced safety relief valve - A balanced valve incorporates a means of minimizing the effect of backpressure on the operational characteristics of the valve.

Pilot operated pressure relief valve - The major relieving device is combined with, and is controlled by, a self-actuated auxiliary pressure relief device.

Power-actuated safety relief valve - A pressure relief valve in which the major pressure-relieving device is combined with, and controlled by, a device requiring an external source of energy.

Standard safety valve - A valve which, following the opening, reaches the degree of lift necessary for the mass flowrate to be discharged within a pressure rise of not more than 10%. (The valve is characterized by a pop-type action and is sometimes known as high lift).

Full lift (Vollhub) safety valve - A safety valve which, after commencement of lift, opens rapidly within a 5% pressure rise up to the full lift as limited by the design. The amount of lift up to the rapid opening (proportional range) shall not be more than 20%.

Directly loaded safety valve - A safety valve in which the opening force underneath the valve disc is opposed by a closing force such as a spring or a weight.

Proportional safety valve - A safety valve that opens more or less steadily in relation to the increase in pressure. Sudden opening within a 10% lift range will not occur without a pressure increase. Following opening within a pressure of not more than 10%, these safety valves achieve the lift necessary for the mass flow to be discharged.

Diaphragm safety valve - A directly loaded safety valve wherein linear moving and rotating elements and springs are protected against the effects of the fluid by a diaphragm

Bellows safety valve - A directly loaded safety valve wherein sliding and (partially or fully) rotating elements and springs are protected against the effects of the fluids by a bellows. The bellows may be of such a design that it compensates for influences of backpressure.

Controlled safety valve- Consists of the main valve and a control device. It also includes direct acting safety valves with supplementary loading in which, until the set pressure is reached, an additional force increases the closing force.

Safety valve - A safety valve which automatically, without the assistance of any energy other than that of the fluid concerned, discharges a quantity of the fluid so as to prevent a predetermined safe pressure from being exceeded, and which is designed to re-close and prevent further flow of fluid after normal pressure conditions of service have been restored. Note; the valve can be characterized either by pop action (rapid opening) or by opening in proportion (not necessarily linear) to the increase in pressure over the set pressure.

Directly loaded safety valve - A safety valve in which the loading due to the fluid pressure underneath the valve disc is opposed only by a direct mechanical loading device such as weight, lever, and weight, or a spring.

Assisted safety valve - A safety valve which by means of a powered assistance mechanism, may additionally be lifted at a pressure lower than the set pressure and will, even in the event of a failure of the assistance mechanism, comply with all the requirements for safety valves given in the standard.

Supplementary loaded safety valve - A safety valve that has, until the pressure at the inlet to the safety valve reaches the set pressure, an additional force, which increases the sealing force.

Notes; This additional strength (additional burden), which can be provided through foreign resources, is reliably released when the pressure on the safety valve inlet reaches the specified pressure. The amount of additional loading is very regulated that if the additional loading is not released, the safety valve will reach its certified discharge capacity at a pressure which is no greater than 1.1 times the maximum pressure that is permitted to be protected.

Pilot operated safety valve - A safety valve, the operation of which is initiated and controlled by the fluid discharged from a pilot valve, which is itself, a directly loaded safety valve subject to the requirement of the standard.

The common characteristic shared between the definitions of conventional safety valves in the different standards, is that their operational characteristics are affected by any backpressure in the discharge system. It is important to note that the total backpressure is generated from two components; superimposed backpressure and the built-up backpressure:

Subsequently, in a conventional safety valve, only the superimposed backpressure will affect the opening characteristic and set value, but the combined backpressure will alter the blowdown characteristic and re-seat value.

Once the valve starts to open, the effects of built-up backpressure also have to be taken into account. For a conventional safety valve with the spring housing vented to the discharge side of the valve.

Therefore, if the back pressure is greater than the overpressure, the valve will tend to close, reducing the flow. This can lead to instability within the system and can result in flutter or chatter of the valve.

In general, if conventional safety valves are used in applications, where there is excessive built-up backpressure, they will not perform as expected. According to the API 520 Recommended Practice Guidelines:

A conventional pressure relief valve should typically not be used when the built-up backpressure is greater than 10% of the set pressure at 10% overpressure. A higher maximum allowable built-up backpressure may be used for overpressure greater than 10%.

The European Standard EN ISO 4126, however, states that the built-up backpressure should be limited to 10% of the set pressure when the valve is discharging at the certified capacity.

For the majority of steam applications, the back pressure can be maintained within these limits by carefully sizing any discharge pipes. This will be discussed in Module 9.4. If, however, it is not feasible to reduce the backpressure, then it may be necessary to use a balanced safety valve.

Balanced safety valves are those that incorporate a means of eliminating the effects of backpressure. There are two basic designs that can be used to achieve this:

The bellows arrangement prevents back pressure acting on the upper side of the disc within the area of the bellows. The disc area extending beyond the bellows and the opposing disc area are equal, and so the forces acting on the disc are balanced, and the backpressure has little effect on the valve opening pressure.

Bellows failure is an important concern when using a bellows balanced safety valve, as this may affect the set pressure and capacity of the valve. It is important, therefore, that there is some mechanism for detecting any uncharacteristic fluid flow through the bellows vents. In addition, some bellows balanced safety valves include an auxiliary piston that is used to overcome the effects of backpressure in the case of bellows failure. This type of safety valve is usually only used on critical applications in the oil and petrochemical industries.

Since balanced pressure relief valves are typically more expensive than their unbalanced counterparts, they are commonly only used where high-pressure manifolds are unavoidable, or in critical applications where a very precise set pressure or blowdown is required.

This type of safety valve uses the flowing medium itself, through a pilot valve, to apply the closing force on the safety valve disc. The pilot valve is itself a small safety valve.

The diaphragm type is typically only available for low-pressure applications and it produces a proportional type action, characteristic of relief valves used in liquid systems. They are therefore of little use in steam systems, consequently, they will not be considered in this text.

The piston-type valve consists of the main valve, which uses a piston-shaped closing device (or obturator), and an external pilot valve. Below photo shows a diagram of a typical piston type, pilot-operated safety valve.

The piston and seating arrangement incorporated in the main valve is designed so that the bottom area of the piston, exposed to the inlet fluid, is less than the area of the top of the piston. As both ends of the piston are exposed to the fluid at the same pressure, this means that under normal system operating conditions, the closing force, resulting from the larger top area, is greater than the inlet force. The resultant downward force therefore holds the piston firmly on its seat.

If the inlet pressure were to rise, the net closing force on the piston also increases, ensuring that a tight shut-off is continually maintained. However, when the inlet pressure reaches the set pressure, the pilot valve will pop open to release the fluid pressure above the piston. With much less fluid pressure acting on the upper surface of the piston, the inlet pressure generates a net upwards force and the piston will leave its seat. This causes the main valve to pop open, allowing the process fluid to be discharged.

When the inlet pressure has been sufficiently reduced, the pilot valve will reclose, preventing the further release of fluid from the top of the piston, thereby re-establishing the net downward force, and causing the piston to reseat.

Pilot operated safety valves offer good overpressure and blowdown performance (a blowdown of 2% is attainable). For this reason, they are used where a narrow margin is required between the set pressure and the system operating pressure. Pilot operated valves are also available in much larger sizes, making them the preferred type of safety valve for larger capacities.

One of the main concerns with pilot operated safety valves is that the small bore, pilot connecting pipes are susceptible to blockage by foreign matter, or due to the collection of condensate in these pipes. This can lead to the failure of the valve, either in the open or closed position, depending on where the blockage occurs.

The terms full lift, high lift and low lift refer to the amount of travel the disc undergoes as it moves from its closed position to the position required to produce the certified discharge capacity, and how this affects the discharge capacity of the valve.

A full lift safety valve is one in which the disc lifts sufficiently, so that the curtain area no longer influences the discharge area. The discharge area, and therefore the capacity of the valve are subsequently determined by the bore area. This occurs when the disc lifts a distance of at least a quarter of the bore diameter. A full lift conventional safety valve is often the best choice for general steam applications.

The disc of a high lift safety valve lifts a distance of at least 1/12th of the bore diameter. This means that the curtain area, and ultimately the position of the disc, determines the discharge area. The discharge capacities of high lift valves tend to be significantly lower than those of full lift valves, and for a given discharge capacity, it is usually possible to select a full lift valve that has a nominal size several times smaller than a corresponding high lift valve, which usually incurs cost advantages.Furthermore, high lift valves tend to be used on compressible fluids where their action is more proportional.

In low lift valves, the disc only lifts a distance of 1/24th of the bore diameter. The discharge area is determined entirely by the position of the disc, and since the disc only lifts a small amount, the capacities tend to be much lower than those of full or high lift valves.

Except when safety valves are discharging, the only parts that are wetted by the process fluid are the inlet tract (nozzle) and the disc. Since safety valves operate infrequently under normal conditions, all other components can be manufactured from standard materials for most applications. There are however several exceptions, in which case, special materials have to be used, these include:

Cast steel - Commonly used on higher pressure valves (up to 40 bar g). Process type valves are usually made from a cast steel body with an austenitic full nozzle type construction.

For all safety valves, it is important that moving parts, particularly the spindle and guides are made from materials that will not easily degrade or corrode. As seats and discs are constantly in contact with the process fluid, they must be able to resist the effects of erosion and corrosion.

The spring is a critical element of the safety valve and must provide reliable performance within the required parameters. Standard safety valves will typically use carbon steel for moderate temperatures. Tungsten steel is used for higher temperature, non-corrosive applications, and stainless steel is used for corrosive or clean steam duty. For sour gas and high temperature applications, often special materials such as monel, hastelloy and ‘inconel’ are used.

Standard safety valves are generally fitted with an easing lever, which enables the valve to be lifted manually in order to ensure that it is operational at pressures in excess of 75% of set pressure. This is usually done as part of routine safety checks, or during maintenance to prevent seizing. The fitting of a lever is usually a requirement of national standards and insurance companies for steam and hot water applications. For example, the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code states that pressure relief valves must be fitted with a lever if they are to be used on air, water over 60°C, and steam.

A test gag (Figure 9.2.7) may be used to prevent the valve from opening at the set pressure during hydraulic testing when commissioning a system. Once tested, the gag screw is removed and replaced with a short blanking plug before the valve is placed in service.

The amount of fluid depends on the particular design of the safety valve. If the emission of this fluid into the atmosphere is acceptable, the spring housing may be vented to the atmosphere – an open bonnet. This is usually advantageous when the safety valve is used on high-temperature fluids or for boiler applications as, otherwise, high temperatures can relax the spring, altering the set pressure of the valve. However, using an open bonnet exposes the valve spring and internals to environmental conditions, which can lead to damage and corrosion of the spring.

When the fluid must be completely contained by the safety valve (and the discharge system), it is necessary to use a closed bonnet, which is not vented to the atmosphere. This type of spring enclosure is almost universally used for small screwed valves and, it is becoming increasingly common on many valve ranges since, particularly on steam, discharge of the fluid could be hazardous to personnel.

Some safety valves, most commonly those used for water applications, incorporate a flexible diaphragm or bellows to isolate the safety valve spring and upper chamber from the process fluid, (see Figure 9.2.9).

**Update to this article, June 7, 2022 : If you found this article helpful, here is a link to another article I recently found that does a nice job explaining the topic: ENGINEERS BEWARE: API vs ASME Relief Valve Orifice Size – Petro Chem Engineering (petrochemengg.com)

NOTE: this article is written to an audience that is familiar with PSVs, PSV sizing, and API and ASME standards at a basic level. I initially wrote this article in early 2017, and due to some great input and questions made significant revisions to increase clarity in mid-2018. I hope it is helpful to you, please send me a message with any comments/questions!

If you"ve ever sized/selected a Pressure Safety-Relief Valve (PSV) using vendor sizing programs or good-old hand calculations, you"ve probably run into a very strange anomaly: Why does a PSV orifice size change between American Petroleum Institute (API) and American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) data sets? What is an "effective" orifice area? How do I know which standard to use when selecting a PSV?

Usually, this issue is one of curiosity and doesn"t affect the end result of what valve is chosen. Common practice is to default to API sizing equations and parameters, and only use ASME data sets for situations outside of the API letter-designations. But what if I told you that approach is likely causing you to oversize about 10% of your PSVs and their respective piping systems?

Most of the time simply using API data sets is fine. And I should note that this is a conservative approach, so you won’t make a mistake doing this. But did you know that PSVs are certified to ASME capacities, not API? And did you know those ASME capacities are nearly always higher than the API ones? I’m guessing you don’t, because there are very few resources available that speak to this topic. I’ve found it common for engineers to understand API 520 quite well, but have a very limited working knowledge of how the ASME BPVC comes into play.

Too often, we leave that third part out of the process, and simply calculate relief loads and select valves using API techniques, without ever checking our selection against certified ASME data. Proper application of these standards is the first key point of this article:

Initial sizing and valve selection is done using API equations, and final valve selection and certification is done using ASME-certified coefficients and capacities.

When sizing a PSV, the sizing equations are always API 520. When a PSV is certified, it is always certified to ASME BPVC (whether one “selects” ASME certification or not!) It"s important to remember that the ASME BPVC is the "code", the standard to which we must design. API 520/526 are "recommended practices" which were developed to give engineers a tool to meet the ASME requirements. Another way to look at it: ASME BPVC sets the goal, API 520/526 provide the instructions, and ASME has the final say.

The BPVC is an enormous code, and not reviewed in detail here. On the subject of PSVs, it basically says that a PSV must be capable of relieving the required load, and it must be tested in a specific manner to be certified to do so. If a valve is tested per the specific directions in the BPVC, it will be ASME certified and receive an ASME UV stamp.

NOTE: when specifying a PSV for a pressure vessel, it"s important to always specify that the UV stamp is required. There are times when a non-code PSV is acceptable, but that is outside the scope of this article.

The first thing API does is attempt to standardize physical PSV sizes and design, and it does so in API RP 526, which is targeted at PSV manufacturers. API provides pre-defined valve sizes, with letter designations D through T (API 526). It also defines other details directed toward valve manufacturers (such as temperature ratings). All of this is intended as minimum design standards, and manufacturers are free to exceed these parameters as they wish.

The second thing API does is provide standardized equations and parameters to use when trying to figure out just what size of a PSV one needs for a particular scenario. The equations account for design parameters that ASME doesn"t speak to, such as specific fluid properties, backpressures, critical flow, two-phase flow, and many other aspects of fluid dynamics that will affect the ability of a particular valve to relieve a required load.

API sizing equations are by nature theoretical, standardized, and use default or "dummy" values for several sizing parameters that may or may not reflect the actual values for any specific valve.

API RP 520 very clearly talks about this, and emphasizes that the intended use of its equations is to determine a preliminary valve size, which should be verified with actual data. API intends PSV sizing to be a two-step process, but we are often unaware of this because we (gasp) don’t read the full standard, and/or rely solely on vendor sizing software that hides the iteration from us. See API 520, part 1, section 5.2 for further explanation.

When valves are built, they are built to the API RP 526 standard, however, as one might imagine, when valves are actually tested and certified, the results don’t match up identically to the theoretical values that were calculated. This is where API and ASME intersect; we switch from calculations (API) which were used as a basis to design the valve, to actual empirical data (ASME) to certify the valve. When a valve manufacturer gets the UV code stamp that certifies the valve orifice size and capacity, it is based on actual test results, not API sizing standards. And ASME (which came first) does not have tiered letter designations. The typical D, E, F, etc. sizes we refer to are strictly an API tool, and ASME’s capacity certifications are completely independent of them!

2. They test the final product according to ASME BPVC, and get a result that equates to an effective orifice area of 4.90in2. This is its ASME effective area.

3. A third-party Engineer (you), trying to select a PSV, runs a sizing calculation using API 520 equations on ABC Valve Company"s sizing software, gets a result that requires 4.66in2 to relieve the load, and is now thoroughly confused on what size valve to select.

If one selects the API data set on the sizing software in this example, it will automatically eliminate N-orifice valves as an option, and bump the user up to a P-orifice. However, if one simply selects the ASME data set, the N-orifice valve magically reappears as an option. How can this be? Will the N-orifice work or not?

The short answer is yes, it is certified to an actual area of 4.90in2. So the “N” orifice for this specific PSV will work, and is certified to do so, in this application. Remember: use API to get you close, and ASME to confirm the final answer.

Digest that for a moment. If you’ve sized and purchased more than a dozen PSVs, chances are you have inadvertently selected a PSV a full size larger than you needed to, in a situation much like our example, simply because you chose a PSV based on its API “rating” rather than its real, certified, stamped ASME rating. If that was a small valve, impact was probably nil. But what if this happened on a valve that resulted in selecting a 8x10 PSV when you could have used a 6x8?

If you’re like me, that answer isn’t very satisfying. Why on earth is this so confusing? How can you simply hit a button on the sizing program and a different size of valve is suddenly acceptable? The key lies how the main coefficient of discharge, Kd, is handled, and how capacities are determined.

There are several K values used in API calculations, all of which have generic values defined in API 520 that can be used for preliminary sizing. These are the numbers used in initial sizing calculations to get us close, then (if we do this correctly) replaced with the actual/tested/empirical/ASME values when we get a certified valve. Remember, anytime you hear “certified” or “stamped”, think ASME.

Let’s take the numbers from the example above, which came from an attempt to size a valve for liquid relief. API says to use a value of Kd=0.65 for liquid relief. If one uses the API data set on the vendor software, then the calculation stops here, and you get a required area of 4.66in2. When you select a valve, you’re comparing that to the API effective (actual) area of an N orifice, which is 4.34 in2, which is obviously too small and you’d logically step up to a P orifice. However….

Remember that the API N-orifice area is just the benchmark, a minimum requirement, and may or may not (most likely not) reflect the actual area of a real-life PSV. Once a valve is selected, all of those K values and capacities should be replaced with actual ASME-certified K values, also determined by testing, that are specific to each valve model, and the calculations performed again.

Normally, ASME-certified K-values are smaller than the API dummy values, driving up the required orifice area. So valve manufacturers have to over-design their valves to make up for it, resulting in ASME-certified areas and capacities that typically exceed the benchmark API ones. The end result of all this?

It (almost) all boils down to one sneaky little sentence in the ASME BPVC which mandates a 10% safety factor on the empirically-determined Kd that “de-rates” the valve (see ASME BPVC Section VIII, UG-131.e.2). This tidbit seems to be a little-known fact that is key to proper PSV sizing and selection, because as engineers we often pile safety factors upon each other and oversize our equipment. I cannot highlight this enough:

I mentioned above that ASME K values are nearly always lower than API values, due to this 10% de-rating. The PSV in our example scenario has a determined Kd of 0.73, which is adjusted down by 10% for a final AMSE Kd of 0.66, slightly higher than the dummy API value (that just means that this particular valve proved it could do about 11% better than the minimum theoretical flow calculated by API when it was tested). So, for our valve in question, the Required ASME area is slightly less than the API area. This is atypical, but not unheard of, and again points to the importance of checking the ASME ratings of any valve you select, and comparing against the API benchmarks.

But that’s not the whole picture. For our example, the net effect of the ASME Kd is basically nothing. So how is it the ASME capacity is higher? This brings us to the last key concept:

When you choose to use the ASME data on a specific valve, it’s not just the Kd sizing factor that changes; the actual orifice area and therefore the capacity of the valve also adjusts to empirical, certified values. You can generally expect both values to increase over the API values.

Why is this? Simply that any given real-world valve is usually over-designed so that it will meet and exceed the required minimum capacity of its corresponding API size. What a simple concept, but so often overlooked by engineers!

Back to our example scenario: even though the ASME Kd, and hence required area, adjustment had a negligible effect, the actual ASME orifice area, and hence capacity, is significantly higher than the listed API area and capacity for an N-orifice. Below is a summary:API N Orifice: 4.340 in2

*Note: this is data from a real case; the specific PSV make/model is omitted. Did you catch the result? The actual, certified capacity of this valve is nearly 13% higher than the generic N-orifice valve, and that includes its 10% safety factor!

With this adjusted orifice area, we can compare to the ASME certified area (which is always going to be larger than the API area), and we have our final answer for the valve size. Often this will not result in a different choice of valve, but sometimes, as in the example case, it will allow us to use a valve with an API letter designation that did not appear large enough based on its API effective area. This can save time and money for our plants by preventing over-sizing valves, leading to smaller piping systems to support them. And remember, the ASME values are empirical and have a 10% safety factor built in, so we don’t need to worry about cutting the design too close; the conservatism is already built in to the method. We can choose the Brand X N-orifice valve and sleep well at night!

Avoid simply defaulting to the API data set for the final “rating” or data sheet when selecting a PSV. Use API sizing calculations as they are intended: for preliminary valve selection. Then switch to the ASME data set. This will often (but not always, remember, it"s valve-specific) result in two differences:

2. A required orifice area that is greater than the one calculated by API. This is also ok, and is usually due to the 10% de-rating on Kd that ASME requires.

Closing notes: PSV sizing and selection is a big topic, and this article only addresses one issue. I have chosen to omit specific code references and quotations in an attempt to make this a general guideline that is useful for most engineers, not an interpretation of the codes. Many tangent issues can spin off from this article; I will be happy to help with any questions it may generate. Please email me any comments or suggestions, I welcome all input.

Since 1960s, we have developed many safety relieving devices (pressure relief valves) with high performance and reliability which used for aerospace. And we have accumulated abundant developing experience, built perfect manufacturing & test equipment. To meet the demands for high performance pressure relief valves manufactured in accordance with international standards in various fields, we have developed HT series productswith the help of China Corporation of Petrochemistry Industry, previous Ministry of Chemical Industry, Ministry of Labor and relative plants since 1980s. In May 1997, examined and verified by Space Quality Certificate Commission, the products were granted “China Space Mark Product”. And in Sept. 1999, as first batch manufacturer, we are acquired the certificate of “safety registration” which is issued by China State Bureau of Quality & Technology Supervision.In October 2014, got GB/T24001-2004(idt IS024001: 2004) environment management system certification. In October 2015, got GB/T19001-2008 (idt ISO9001:2008) quality system certification.

HT series pressure relief valve was strictly designed, manufactured, tested and acceptance checked in accordance with API standards and ASME codes. The inner structure of valve, along with the design, manufacture and process method of critical parts are designed by utilizing mature experiences from aerospace technology which has been accumulated for more than 50 years.Since 2012, most of HT series pressure relief valvehas reached international standard among peers by obtaining the ASME UV certification.

Our institute is the commission entity of National Engineering Research Center for Special Pumps & Valves, and has top-ranking pressure relief valve performance test equipment. Above all, we are able to supply high performance pressure relief valve in accordance with international standards to domestic projects and other sets established abroad.

Disclaimer: This Code of Ordinances and/or any other documents that appear on this site may not reflect the most current legislation adopted by the Municipality. American Legal Publishing Corporation provides these documents for informational purposes only. These documents should not be relied upon as the definitive authority for local legislation. Additionally, the formatting and pagination of the posted documents varies from the formatting and pagination of the official copy. The official printed copy of a Code of Ordinances should be consulted prior to any action being taken.

For further information regarding the official version of any of this Code of Ordinances or other documents posted on this site, please contact the Municipality directly or contact American Legal Publishing toll-free at 800-445-5588.

Safety valves or pressure relief valves are pressure regulating devices that are responsible for expelling excess pressure from the system when the maximum pressure levels for which they have been designed are exceeded, usually due to a

Safety valves perform their function when the pressure of the system where the fluid is contained, becomes higher than the maximum set pressure of the valve previously adjusted. When the system pressure is higher than the valve’s set

pressure, this opens, releasing the excess pressure to the atmosphere or to containment tanks, depending on the toxicity of the fluid. After releasing the excess, the valve closes again and the system pressure returns to normal.

To ensure total safety of personnel and installation, make sure that the valves have passed all safety tests and meet the requirements of the system where they are to be installed. All our valves are supplied with certificates of materials, cas-

What is the difference between the instantaneous full opening safety valve AIT (PSV) and the normal opening relief valve AN or progressive opening relief valve AP (PRV)?

The Pressure Safety Valve (PSV) opens instantaneously and fully upon reaching the set pressure for which it is designed, expelling the excess pressure from the system immediately. They are optimised for use with steam or gases.

In contrast, the normally or progressively opening Pressure Relief Valve (PRV) opens gradually as the system pressure rises above the set pressure of the valve above its setting. They are optimised to work with liquids.

At VYC Industrial we are specialists in the design and manufacture of all types of safety valves. We have a wide range of safety valves to cover all the needs of the sector.

The Mod. 496 EN safety valve works as an automatic pressure releasing regulator activated by the static pressure existing at the entrance to the valve and is characterized by its ability to open instantly and totally.

The Mod. 495 EN pressure relief valve works as an automatic pressure releasing regulator activated by the static pressure existing at the entrance to the valve and is characterized by its ability to open instantly and totally.

The relief valve works as an automatic pressure releasing regulator activated by the static pressure existing at the entrance to the valve and is characterized by its ability to open instantly and totally.

The valve works as an automatic pressure releasing regulator activated by the static pressure existing at the entrance to the valve and is characterized by its ability to open instantly and totally.

The valve works as an automatic pressure releasing regulator activated by the static pressure existing at the entrance to the valve and is characterized by its ability to open instantly and totally.

The valve works as an automatic pressure releasing regulator activated by the static pressure existing at the entrance to the valve and is characterized by its ability to open instantly and totally.

The valve works as an automatic pressure releasing regulator activated by the static pressure existing at the entrance to the valve and is characterized by its ability to open instantly and totally.

The valve works as an automatic pressure releasing regulator activated by the static pressure existing at the entrance to the valve and is characterized by its ability to open instantly and totally.

The valve works as an automatic pressure releasing regulator activated by the static pressure existing at the entrance to the valve and is characterized by its ability to open, at the fi rst proportional to the pressure increase, and after instantly and totally.

The valve works as an automatic pressure releasing regulator activated by the static pressure existing at the entrance to the valve and is characterized by its ability to open, at the fi rst proportional to the pressure increase, and after instantly and totally.

The valve works as an automatic pressure releasing regulator activated by the static pressure existing at the entrance to the valve and is characterized by its ability to open, at the fi rst proportional to the pressure increase, and after instantly and totally.

The valve works as an automatic pressure releasing regulator activated by the static pressure existing at the entrance to the valve and is characterized by its ability to open proportional to the pressure increase.

The valve works as an automatic pressure releasing regulator activated by the static pressure existing at the entrance to the valve and is characterized by its ability to open proportional to the pressure increase.

The valve works as an automatic pressure releasing regulator activated by the static pressure existing at the entrance to the valve and is characterized by its ability to open instantly and totally.

The valve works as an automatic pressure releasing regulator activated by the static pressure existing at the entrance to the valve and is characterized by its ability to open instantly and totally.

The valve works as an automatic pressure releasing regulator activated by the static pressure existing at the entrance to the valve and is characterized by its ability to open instantly and totally.

The valve works as an automatic pressure releasing regulator activated by the static pressure existing at the entrance to the valve and is characterized by its ability to open instantly and totally.

The valve works as an automatic pressure releasing regulator activated by the static pressure existing at the entrance to the valve and is characterized by its ability to open instantly and totally.

They are used in places such as power, chemical and petrochemical plants to discharge safety valves, control valves, etc. in pressure lines and equipment that convey compressible substances such as steam, air, carbon dioxide, helium, methane, nitrogen, oxygen and other gases.

Test bench for regular inspections and setting and resetting safety valves. Ideal for distributors, maintenance companies or with in-house maintenance. It allows safety valves to be adjusted, tested and/or checked to the test pressure (setting) Pe wile cold (simulating service conditions), matching the opening pressure Ps and the closing pressure Pc, in accordance with the standard regulations.

Controlled safety pressure relief system CSPRS valves are mainly used where conventional direct-loaded spring action valves cannot guarantee the opening and closing margins that certain specifi c conditions of service demand.

The objective is to help the closure by means of pressure so that the valve remains completely watertight until reaching the set pressure and/or to activate the opening with pressure.

Increase the operating pressure of the system up to 99.9% of the set pressure.The control safety pressure relief system CSPRS device can be used with any safety valve available in the market and in particular, with models VYC Mod. 485, 486, 494, 495 and 496.